[Interior] experience of the backseat.
#16
I'm not sure what everyone is talking about... I'm 6'1 and 250, and I fit in the back seat of my third gen just fine... :/
#18
I've never been in a 2 door sports car with any backroom or headroom. Maybe they were different in the 60s. I think the only reason they still put backseats in Camaros, Mustangs, ext. is so people can use them just in case. 90% of my driving is done by myself so the rear in my '96 is was really not important.
#21
At 71" I can sit in the back of my 94 and not hit my head on the roof. I should sit in the back of a GTO, those back seats actually look spacious, too bad there isn't a fast way to move the seat forward to get in and out.
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: I was born and raised and reside in Philadelphia, PA.
Posts: 180
I remember sitting in my friends 93 z28, and I don't recall having any problems. I'm also 5'6...Plus I really am not going to care about backseat space anyway because I'll be in the drivers seat all the time
#24
I'm interested to see how the '10 Camaro's backseats stack up to other sport coupes. My 96 is fairly comfortable, I was ok in the back of fox body stangs as well as sn95's, G35 was fine, and I thought the GTO was fairly decent on room too. I'm 5'10" and just fine in these backseats but maybe unlike most people here, getting into the backseat of a sport coupe is exactly what I expect it to be and I don't become flustered that these cars don't have DTS-like rear seat room. Even with this said, the current Mustang and Camaro are still way too large!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
09-18-2015 03:46 PM