Old 04-18-2008, 12:23 PM   #1
2001Firehawk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Pa
Posts: 304
5.3 V8 DI 400HP as the BASE V8

Got to thinking about Scott saying that we're in for some big surprises.

The biggest surprise I believe, will be what the BASE V8 will be.

From the get-go, I believed that the Camaro, was going to be the showcase vehicle, for the next generation of V8 engines.

The design goal will probaby be a BASE V8 with 100HP more, than the BASE V6.

With a 2.0L 260HP I4 , & a 3.6L 304HP V6 already done.
The time for the DI V8 is here now.

With everyone knowing that it won't be the LS2 , & thinking that it will be the LS3, I think that we'll be in for a nice surprise...
2001Firehawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 12:28 PM   #2
skorpion317
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2001Firehawk View Post
Got to thinking about Scott saying that we're in for some big surprises.

The biggest surprise I believe, will be what the BASE V8 will be.

From the get-go, I believed that the Camaro, was going to be the showcase vehicle, for the next generation of V8 engines.

The design goal will probaby be a BASE V8 with 100HP more, than the BASE V6.

With a 2.0L 260HP I4 , & a 3.6L 304HP V6 already done.
The time for the DI V8 is here now.

With everyone knowing that it won't be the LS2 , & thinking that it will be the LS3, I think that we'll be in for a nice surprise...
Nope.

The LNF 2.0L turbo DI engine was mentioned in passing by Bob Lutz as a possibility if CAFE causes a problem for the Camaro. It's not even remotely close to "already done".

The LS3 will be the "base" V8. The Gen V DI motors aren't quite yet ready to be released.
__________________
1998 Camaro 3.8L M5 - Some bolt-ons, !Rear seats, '93-96 tail light conversion
15.269@90.84 MPH
2009 Malibu LS
2010 Camaro SS/RS M6
skorpion317 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 12:33 PM   #3
SManZ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 20
I don't know much about the 5.3 motor...what would its advantages be? Is it DOD capable? DI would provide better mileage - do you expect mileage figures to be better than with LS3?

Just curious and want to learn more
__________________
2004 Nissan 350Z (Performance Trim)...soon to be replaced
Sportbike Nut: '07 GSX-R750 & '06 FZ1
SManZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 12:38 PM   #4
skorpion317
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by SManZ View Post
I don't know much about the 5.3 motor...what would its advantages be? Is it DOD capable? DI would provide better mileage - do you expect mileage figures to be better than with LS3?

Just curious and want to learn more
Unless GM is developing a new RWD 5.3L V8, the only 5.3L V8s in the lineup right now are the Vortec truck engines. They put out between 315-320 HP and 340 lb.ft. of torque.
__________________
1998 Camaro 3.8L M5 - Some bolt-ons, !Rear seats, '93-96 tail light conversion
15.269@90.84 MPH
2009 Malibu LS
2010 Camaro SS/RS M6
skorpion317 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 12:42 PM   #5
CLEAN
Registered User
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 3,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by skorpion317 View Post
Unless GM is developing a new RWD 5.3L V8, the only 5.3L V8s in the lineup right now are the Vortec truck engines. They put out between 315-320 HP and 340 lb.ft. of torque.
He could be talking about the LS4, which I have in the Impala, but as far as I know, it's a FWD only engine. Besides, the DI 3.6 makes more power (though mine sounds better ), so why would you want an LS4? A 400hp 5.3 would be fun, but I suspect that's not what it's going to be.
__________________
2010 Camaro RS/SS Mine...allll mine....Aqua Blue SS/RS
2008 Corvette
2009 G8 GT
2004 Blazer
CLEAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 01:25 PM   #6
HAZ-Matt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: TX Med Ctr
Posts: 3,195
Send a message via AIM to HAZ-Matt
Gen Vs will either debut in a Cadillac truck or the Corvette.
__________________
Matt
2001 Formula

SOM FQuick Group FullThrottleV6 - The V6 Source
HAZ-Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 01:28 PM   #7
FiefSS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 818
Send a message via AIM to FiefSS
That would be cool.. probably won't happen out of the gate. But I'd have no problem driving a 400hp 5.3l Camaro if it got a few more mpg's...
__________________
--1969 Camaro-- 302 Chevy, 4 speed, mildly wild...Someday
--1998 Camaro Z/28-- M6, 3.73's, Lid, GMMG,!CAGS ,Short Throw Shifter,lowered, some suspension goodies ,35th stripes, SS spoiler/hood, TTII's with KDW 2's. Lucy
FiefSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 03:15 PM   #8
Primus
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by skorpion317 View Post
Nope.

The LNF 2.0L turbo DI engine was mentioned in passing by Bob Lutz as a possibility if CAFE causes a problem for the Camaro. It's not even remotely close to "already done".

The LS3 will be the "base" V8. The Gen V DI motors aren't quite yet ready to be released.
When he said, "already done", I think he was referring to the motor being already done on other GM cars.
__________________
Live!!! Check it out.

Trion Studios
Primus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 03:23 PM   #9
skorpion317
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLEAN View Post
He could be talking about the LS4, which I have in the Impala, but as far as I know, it's a FWD only engine. Besides, the DI 3.6 makes more power (though mine sounds better ), so why would you want an LS4? A 400hp 5.3 would be fun, but I suspect that's not what it's going to be.
The LS4 is a FWD only engine. If it were put into a RWD application, the throttle body would be facing the firewall.
__________________
1998 Camaro 3.8L M5 - Some bolt-ons, !Rear seats, '93-96 tail light conversion
15.269@90.84 MPH
2009 Malibu LS
2010 Camaro SS/RS M6
skorpion317 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 03:32 PM   #10
CLEAN
Registered User
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 3,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by skorpion317 View Post
The LS4 is a FWD only engine. If it were put into a RWD application, the throttle body would be facing the firewall.
I know, that's why I said as far as I know, it was a FWD engine only.
__________________
2010 Camaro RS/SS Mine...allll mine....Aqua Blue SS/RS
2008 Corvette
2009 G8 GT
2004 Blazer
CLEAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 03:50 PM   #11
skorpion317
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLEAN View Post
I know, that's why I said as far as I know, it was a FWD engine only.
It would be possible to put the LS4 into a RWD application if a new intake manifold were made.

However, I don't think there's any point to putting the LS4 into the Camaro.
__________________
1998 Camaro 3.8L M5 - Some bolt-ons, !Rear seats, '93-96 tail light conversion
15.269@90.84 MPH
2009 Malibu LS
2010 Camaro SS/RS M6
skorpion317 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 05:35 PM   #12
TrickStang37
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 625
Quote:
Originally Posted by skorpion317 View Post
Nope.

The LNF 2.0L turbo DI engine was mentioned in passing by Bob Lutz as a possibility if CAFE causes a problem for the Camaro. It's not even remotely close to "already done".

The LS3 will be the "base" V8. The Gen V DI motors aren't quite yet ready to be released.
you have zero credible sources.
TrickStang37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 06:11 PM   #13
Mjolnir
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by skorpion317 View Post
It would be possible to put the LS4 into a RWD application if a new intake manifold were made.

However, I don't think there's any point to putting the LS4 into the Camaro.
The LS4 has the horsepower, but does it have the torque to move a Camaro?

You're looking at ~1000 pounds difference.
__________________
2005 Cobalt- For sale so I can get a 3rd gen
1999 Suburban- As soon as it gives me an excuse I'm gettin a 383
Mjolnir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 06:44 PM   #14
Grape Ape
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by skorpion317 View Post
The LS4 is a FWD only engine. If it were put into a RWD application, the throttle body would be facing the firewall.
Which would be ideal for a functional cowl induction hood
Grape Ape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 08:50 PM   #15
CLEAN
Registered User
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 3,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mjolnir View Post
The LS4 has the horsepower, but does it have the torque to move a Camaro?

You're looking at ~1000 pounds difference.
323lb/ft for the LS4, 276lb/ft for the 3.6 DI V6.
__________________
2010 Camaro RS/SS Mine...allll mine....Aqua Blue SS/RS
2008 Corvette
2009 G8 GT
2004 Blazer
CLEAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply Post New Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1996-2009 CamaroZ28.Com. All rights reserved.
Forums Directory