Old 01-26-2008, 04:22 PM   #1
Jalopnik
Registered User
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5
Cool New Interior Photos of 2009 Chevy Camaro

Don't know if y'all have seen these -- new interior photos of the 2009 Chevy Camaro



-----------
Ray Wert
Editor-in-Chief - Jalopnik
Jalopnik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 04:30 PM   #2
SGMZ28
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Culpeper, Va
Posts: 47
That looks MUCH better than what I thought it would.
SGMZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 04:45 PM   #3
BigDarknFast
Registered User
 
BigDarknFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Commerce, mi, USA
Posts: 2,377
It's obviously still laden with duct tape (and wow - check out the cardboard floor mats )... but still looks pretty nice so far. I'm reserving final judgement until a true production interior is released. I like the design of the console gauges in particular - they look to be very easy to read. Overall though, it sure looks like this is a 'base' or V6 variant, judging by the wheels and lack of rear spoiler. I'm sure there are more niceties on the 'LT' or upgraded cars. Is that a cupholder I see in the console?
__________________
2005 Grand Prix GXP, Blue-Green Crystal, Ebony leather (hers); 2006 Grand Prix GXP, Dark Cherry Metallic (mine); 1999 Firebird Trans Am, Bright Red; 1984 Camaro Z28, metallic blue, L69, MX0.
More Pix
BigDarknFast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 04:45 PM   #4
VladimirSteel
Registered User
 
VladimirSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 341
i like almost everything but the stupid freaking speedo and tach ... i guess i knew it was going to be like that though, and i guess its nothing that HUD wont make me forget about. That radio does look hard to find an aftermarket one to make look right, but i guess all cars are like that now days. all things considered though it looks pretty dang good.
__________________
1997 camaro RS M5 Silver - Daily driver/boring car... Looking for 600cc sportbike...
Quote:
Originally Posted by one wicked element View Post
I'm a woman with a penis.
Want to cure your depression with a simple press of a button? www.nitrousoutlet.com <-- These guys can help you out
VladimirSteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 04:49 PM   #5
BigDarknFast
Registered User
 
BigDarknFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Commerce, mi, USA
Posts: 2,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by VladimirSteel View Post
i like almost everything but the stupid freaking speedo and tach ... i guess i knew it was going to be like that though, and i guess its nothing that HUD wont make me forget about. That radio does look hard to find an aftermarket one to make look right, but i guess all cars are like that now days. all things considered though it looks pretty dang good.
Agreed. Everything I've read on here makes me think the car will be offered with an optional HUD... which makes me not care much how nice and modern the speedo might be. If there is also an option for factory nav, that will open up a lot of choices there as well so the unique faceplate might not matter much.
BigDarknFast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 04:52 PM   #6
96SSConv#2033
Registered User
 
96SSConv#2033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 125
Looks like the cup holders are right behind the shifter again. And the stereo looks like a pain to put in a NAV/DVD unit.

Oh well, guess I'm getting a Vette instead.

B
96SSConv#2033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 04:59 PM   #7
Tkc23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 90
very pretty love it

dont let cup holders influence your decision :P
Tkc23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 05:02 PM   #8
09camaroZ28
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: long island, ny
Posts: 131
i really like this interior i hope they put a nav in and have an option were the color on the door panel and color around tach and speedo could be the color of your car
__________________
Future owner of a 2010 SS 6 speed
09camaroZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 05:07 PM   #9
Big_Z
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Merrillville, IN
Posts: 217
Send a message via ICQ to Big_Z Send a message via AIM to Big_Z
did anyone notice the torque gauge? either this is an extremely stout 6 cylinder :P, or its one of the v8s because it goes up to 370 lb ft it looks like. im all for full instrumentation though and ill have to put my vote in as yes on console gauges being cool. also do the gauges have a light ring (almost to match the headlight halos) or are they just the shiniest chrome rings ever?
__________________
2000 M6 Z/28
Forged 347 230/234 571/576 113+4 TEA Stage II heads milled to 60cc
LS7 clutch LS6 intake manifold Pacesetter headers TSP Catback
1994 Nissan Sentra SE-R - The Daily, and holdin' it down till I get back home

Last edited by Big_Z; 01-26-2008 at 05:14 PM.
Big_Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 05:14 PM   #10
number77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,473
There should be a torque gauge somewhere in there.
__________________
"Have faith" is not a marketing ploy.
«F-Bodies Arrive Alive»
number77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 05:17 PM   #11
BigDarknFast
Registered User
 
BigDarknFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Commerce, mi, USA
Posts: 2,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Z View Post
did anyone notice the torque gauge? either this is a very stout 6 cylinder, or its one of the v8s because it goes up to 370 lb ft it looks like. im all for full instrumentation though and ill have to put my vote in as yes on console gauges being cool. also do the gauges have a light ring (almost to match the headlight halos) or are they just the shiniest chrome rings ever?
Even if the V8 Camaro ended up with the L76 (391 ft lb TQ), that gauge would/will be inadequate. If the car pictured is a V6, and IF the V6 is the 3.6 (290 ft lb), it makes a little more sense. It could also be - that the gauge face is not a production-car-ready graphic. That's the problem with trying to interpret too much from these unauthorized spy pix. Still though - it's cool to have a Torque gauge... something that would cause massive embarrassment for the typical Honda Civic owner

One other thing. It appears the two gauges most people care most about (temp, fuel) are right up there with the speedo/tach. That should help those who were not in favor of console gauges.

As for the speedo halo - again that's a problem with trying to understand the gauges' appearance and lighting. The pix are horrible in that regard... and how do we know, a trim piece (such as a glare blocker) is not missing from that picture? Perhaps the car was IN that garage for some dash work to be done. We simply will not really know what these parts and components really look like, until their production release.

Last edited by BigDarknFast; 01-26-2008 at 05:25 PM.
BigDarknFast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 05:23 PM   #12
number77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast View Post
Even if the V8 Camaro ended up with the L76 (391 ft lb TQ), that gauge would/will be inadequate. If the car pictured is a V6, and IF the V6 is the 3.6 (290 ft lb), it makes a little more sense. It could also be - that the gauge face is not a production-car-ready graphic. That's the problem with trying to interpret too much from these unauthorized spy pix. Still though - it's cool to have a Torque gauge... something that would cause massive embarrassment for the typical Honda Civic owner
The increments don't follow a linear equation.
__________________
"Have faith" is not a marketing ploy.
«F-Bodies Arrive Alive»
number77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 05:28 PM   #13
BigDarknFast
Registered User
 
BigDarknFast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Commerce, mi, USA
Posts: 2,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by number77 View Post
The increments don't follow a linear equation.
Understood. I guess I was only going by the MAX increment on the gauge - which LOOKS like it might say 370 ft lb. (Again - just speculation, based on extremely blurry and ill-focused pix)
BigDarknFast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 05:31 PM   #14
j18369
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 28
What exactly is the point of the torque gauge? Not like I'm going to be looking down there as I'm slamming on the gas to see what kind of torque I'm getting while I slam into a tree.
j18369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 05:33 PM   #15
number77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast View Post
Understood. I guess I was only going by the MAX increment on the gauge - which LOOKS like it might say 370 ft lb. (Again - just speculation, based on extremely blurry and ill-focused pix)
If they did go in intuitive increments it should read 360ft lb. Which would be more confusing. I mean, they don't HAVE to be linear, but it would make sense for them to be legibly read by a drive without having to do math. Spooky stuff.
__________________
"Have faith" is not a marketing ploy.
«F-Bodies Arrive Alive»
number77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply Post New Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1996-2009 CamaroZ28.Com. All rights reserved.
Forums Directory