V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

what would win, 95 3.4 vert modded vs 98 stang 3.8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2002 | 06:37 PM
  #16  
rollin in a camaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 28
From: bay area, ca, united states
Post

haha yea i need to concentrate on my studies, cuz my GPA is only a 2.0 and i need to keep it like that if i want my car to still be mine, any u guys know any good sites to cheat in math or spanish?
Old Mar 28, 2002 | 10:24 PM
  #17  
97 Camaro RS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1
From: Toledo, Ohio, United States
Post

Just out of curiosity. Would a stock 3.8 camaro be able to take on a stock 3.8 99 or newer mustang? I know the ford 3.8 is a ****ty engine and ford's trannies stink. I have a frend with a 96 3.8 mustang who talked $hit to me and I handed him his a$$ with my 97 3.8 RS. hehe
Old Mar 28, 2002 | 11:09 PM
  #18  
OnixV6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 9
From: Raritan, NJ
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by muckz:
If you'll be getting LSD, I doubt it really matters...
</font>
yes, it does.
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 11:39 AM
  #19  
rikster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 5
From: orlando fl usa
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 97 Camaro RS:
Just out of curiosity. Would a stock 3.8 camaro be able to take on a stock 3.8 99 or newer mustang? I know the ford 3.8 is a ****ty engine and ford's trannies stink. I have a frend with a 96 3.8 mustang who talked $hit to me and I handed him his a$$ with my 97 3.8 RS. hehe</font>
Stock for stock, the 3.8 Camaro and the 99+ 3.8 Stang are pretty evenly matched. You have a little more power, he has a little less weight.
UNLESS the Mustang has an automatic. Even the Ford boys themselves admit that their automatics suck monkey *****, and are nearly a full second slower than manual cars. With an F-Body, the difference is negligable.

Old Sep 10, 2002 | 03:37 AM
  #20  
k9ulan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 117
From: Hawesville Ky
Talking

Yep, My wife had a stock 99 3.8, and I had a stock 96 3.8, both autos.., I beat her all the time..My car out ran hers too
Old Sep 10, 2002 | 03:39 AM
  #21  
k9ulan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 117
From: Hawesville Ky
Post

correction
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by k9ulan:
Yep, My wife had a stock 99 mustang 3.8, and I had a stock 96 camaro 3.8, both autos.., I beat her all the time..My car out ran hers too</font>


------------------
Black 97 Z28 m6: Granitelli MAF, BBK headers, Functional SS Ram Air Hood, Vortech polished elbow,Chrome ZR Wheels
96 3800, !cat, ram air, B&M Shiftkit 97 5 star custom painted wheels
Old Sep 10, 2002 | 05:21 PM
  #22  
Perfecto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 74
From: Colorado, US
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by k9ulan:
Yep, My wife had a stock 99 3.8, and I had a stock 96 3.8, both autos.., I beat her all the time..My car out ran hers too</font>
Thats a good one!!


------------------
Black 94' 3.4l Camaro A4
Old Sep 10, 2002 | 05:28 PM
  #23  
Perfecto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 74
From: Colorado, US
Exclamation

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by All_InTheRED:
The mustang.......unfortunately.</font>
Thats crap my friend had a 98 3.8 liter Mustang and he said he only had 130hp. It didnt seem very fast at all. We never raced but he drove my car and he thought mine was faster. With the mods "rollin" is going to put in his car he should take him. The only thing the mustang has going for it is that it is newer.


------------------
Black 94' 3.4l Camaro A4

[This message has been edited by Perfecto (edited September 10, 2002).]
Old Sep 10, 2002 | 09:39 PM
  #24  
NeoPaladin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Even the Chinese are against me...
Post

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by k9ulan:
Yep, My wife had a stock 99 3.8, and I had a stock 96 3.8, both autos.., I beat her all the time..My car out ran hers too</font>
Damn, someone's been digging up old topics.



------------------
1994 Black Firebird 3.4L
Mods include:"Ghetto Master" K&N FIPK, Crane 8MM Plug Wires and Accel Coil Packs, ASP Underdrive Pulleys, SLP Take-off Shocks and Struts, Edelbrock Performer RPM Catback, Catco Hi-flo Cat, 1 pc. steel DS, built GM 4L60E transmission.

"My kind of music is Marilyn Manson and Orgy. The kind of music that makes mothers hold their childrens ears when I drive by."
Old Sep 10, 2002 | 11:56 PM
  #25  
#7's Avatar
#7
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 568
From: Redding CA. USA
Post

I'm on the fence? I know I'd whip em.Ive takin the 4.6L(all stock) before.
I think the base is a little higher than 130 on the 98 3.8 ford.
Super six Motorsports can get the Ford 3.8 up to 340rwhp stage 4!!
The F*ed up thing is they offer stage 2 for GM 200+rwhp w/ custom computer.For now that is.I'm doing this soon as I have valves heads problems.They say w/ wet nitrous added they can get around they're ford numbers.
Just race him,geeze

------------------
_ _ ______________ _ _
Hella Clean Dark Green Metallic 98 3.8 L60E Coupe:Fast toys Ram Air,Holly filter,Whisper lid,Jet stage2 PCM,160 Thermo,Man.fan switch,Purple ice wetter,Eibach Pros,Koni adjustables,BMR sways,Prothane bushins,Transgo kit,Magnaflow cat-back.National Auto Sport ***. member/student.
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 12:04 AM
  #26  
MustangEater82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,738
From: Charleston, SC
Post

As for the quickest pre 99 stang I ever saw ran 16.4s, it was a 5-speed had intake exhasut and gears, I used to slightly edge him out or be even when I had intake jsut a muffler, and plugs and wires.

I think you will take him, but I am not sure how convert 3.4Ls perform. Get his *** off the line and you will hold out hte entire race.


as for new v6s, all the AODEs I have seen were runing mid 16s with all the basic mods, not as similar to the f-body as you would think.

------------------
-Eric
1994 Medium Quaser Blue Camaro 3.4L V6 w/ 5-speed
Stock blocked, boltons only.
15.696@86.22 with a 2.214 60'!
Best R/T .507 Best 60' 2.078

Father's Stock 2000 Navy Blue Camaro 3.8L V6 w/ 5-speed
15.875@88.25 With wheel spin in 1st
3.4L F-body where 15s are fast....
www.fbodyv6.com
www.firebirdv6.com
www.camaroz28.com
AIM: MustangEater82
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 10:17 AM
  #27  
MustangEater82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,738
From: Charleston, SC
Post

haven't most hte people with supersixxmotorsport packages on f-bodies had nothign but problems?

As for a stock pre 99 3.8L I am 95% sure they are 145 hp.
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 04:37 PM
  #28  
#7's Avatar
#7
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 568
From: Redding CA. USA
Post

Mustangeater,I only have heard of one guys prob. w/ a leaking valve seal.
I'd be very interested in hearing some of the probs.
You gotta admit 200 to the rear sounds good,add the nickle & dime hp mods (already intalled)gets a little higher.A build up on the block,balanced,some headers and a ATI intercooled (LS1)super charger.Ohh Yeah!
Thats my plan
I just realized this post is march 27.Rollin in camaro what did happen?Win or Lose?

------------------
_ _ ______________ _ _
Hella Clean Dark Green Metallic 98 3.8 L60E Coupe:Fast toys Ram Air,Holly filter,Whisper lid,Jet stage2 PCM,160 Thermo,Man.fan switch,Purple ice wetter,Eibach Pros,Koni adjustables,BMR sways,Prothane bushins,Transgo kit,Magnaflow cat-back.National Auto Sport ***. member/student.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mikes 1994 z28
Drivetrain
1
Oct 10, 2015 07:55 AM
SergheiS
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Sep 29, 2015 08:56 PM
DelSoto
Forced Induction
4
Sep 19, 2015 05:31 AM
RX Speed Works
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 11, 2015 03:31 PM
GusarskiSS
Exhaust System
1
Sep 2, 2015 03:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM.