V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

Taller cam or more cubic inches?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 07:19 AM
  #1  
Buck89RS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 139
From: NC
Taller cam or more cubic inches?

Alright people i know i have asked alot of questions these past couple of weeks but i want to make sure i get the most bang for the buck so here goes. Would you have the 2.8 rebuilt with a taller cam, or make the 2.8 into a 3.1 and use a stock cam? I guess i could save more money and get the size and the taller cam. Anyone have any ideas as what would be best on limited funds? Thanks

-William
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 09:15 AM
  #2  
atl2001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 657
From: carbondale IL \ Alton IL (outside St Louie MO)
do em both .. you will kick your *** later if ya dont
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 10:56 AM
  #3  
darkoverlift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,093
CAM...

Or do the 3.4 upgrade
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95maroboi
Forced Induction
8
Jun 7, 2015 12:18 PM
89 iroc zl1
3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech
0
Jan 14, 2015 02:18 AM
Gripenfelter
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
7
Sep 10, 2002 11:01 AM
kizz
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
31
Sep 4, 2002 01:17 PM
Gripenfelter
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
29
Jul 15, 2002 09:29 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.