Flowmaster 40 Vs. No Muffler

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 8, 2005 | 09:47 PM

98_Camaro_16

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 32

From: South Carolina

Flowmaster 40 Vs. No Muffler

Which sounds better?

Jan 8, 2005 | 10:39 PM

Camabird

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 334

From: Orlando Fl

Re: Flowmaster 40 Vs. No Muffler

Never heard a 40 series on a v6, most people get 80. No muffler like loudmouth is raunchy and race car-like (higher pitched and uber loud) up top. I guess it would all depend on your preference. I like have no muffler

Jan 15, 2005 | 08:22 PM

MysticTeal 95 V6

Registered User

Joined: May 2000

Posts: 528

From: Southwest VA

Re: Flowmaster 40 Vs. No Muffler

I just had a Y-pipe in place of where my muffler was at with tips coming out the back on my '95. I had it that way for a couple of years... sounded mean as hell for a V6 from idle up to 2500RPMs or so. After that, it wasn't fart can awful but it wasn't the sweetest sounding either.

I ended up replacing the Y-pipe with the muffler from off my '93 Trans AM and really liked it. Still had a nice tone to it