V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2004, 06:31 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
deadmeat2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 907
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

here, i'll do it for you..
deadmeat2004 is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 06:59 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
hemigtx001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: warren, mi
Posts: 301
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

yes thats what im saying. btw the driver didnt know how to drive. lol. but the 5.0s arent all theya re cooked up to be unless they are modded up
4.6 = problem easyt o wake up as stated before. just finding the right intake and exhaust setup on any car can wake it up. but its really easy with the mustangs. now my 3.4 i feel is faster then my truck, and it takes 4.6s ont he highway. but my 3.4 is alot quicker off the line. and in the 1/2 shift. then my truck is. IMO. i fell strongly that a modded 3.4 vs a stock 5.0 a win for the fbody. ive also gone trhough two rearends. and a trans in my career. lol like i sadi i somehow foudn the right setup for my car. just tweeking it here and there. with alls tock internals. i could hang with a lt1 with intake, exhaust. up to 35-40 then it pulls away. Now What im doing with the Fbody now = not even svt can contain unless high pressure pulley. or mad a$$ investments into modding the motor even more then Ford does when they get hand built at the local romeo engine plant. and a v6 vs a cobra only mr DOOLITTLE can hold up on one of them. an dhes NA 11 second if im not mistaken.
hemigtx001 is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 07:24 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
deadmeat2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 907
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

i cant beleive it...how much hp do you think you are making??? i can stand hearing you can beat a 5.0, it must be factory or just in horrible condition, but not an LT1...thats not right
deadmeat2004 is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 07:31 PM
  #19  
JCU
Registered User
 
JCU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Scranton, PA
Posts: 38
Question Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

I tried very hard to decipher what you wrote and I sure hope I got it right but it was tough. First, you have a 3.4L with intake and exhaust. Have we established that or have things changed now? Your also telling me you hang with modded LT1 Fbodies until 40mph? Am I missing something?

In summation, you have an intake and exhaust on your 3.4L and your beating cammed 5L Mustangs and have only lost to two foxbodies? Also, with the same vehicle your running with modded LT1's until 40mph? What is this truck you have that runs with 4.6L's on the highway?
JCU is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 08:02 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
hemigtx001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: warren, mi
Posts: 301
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

y dont u take a look at my site. btw as stated its alla bout the driver. and the guy with the lt1 i went to school with he cant drive. theys tart pulling at about 30-35 then hes gone by 40. hes all high end. plus i feel that my bird did better burn outs then my truck but it didnt have a throttle control modulater now did it?. btw U can stop bashing on me. my 3.4 amazed me at what it could do after exhaust and intake. it woke it up. its still not an eight. but soon it will be. then ill take a trip to someoens home town. lol and show it off. its not gunna be much just not an everyday combination. carbed 350 to a turbo350 trans. keeping the second rearend ive put in the vehicle for about the first month. then it will blow. but neway u can all stop basihng. theres always something hidden behind the story. and the fact of the matter is engine wear on certain vehicles is minor campared to major on others. the fox bodies are typically 14 yrs old at the least that i have raced. and through those years ahve been beaten on left and right. from owner to owner. a foxbody is only as fast as it can breath. u can do all u want to it if it cant breath it wont run. getting the right exhaust/intake combo wakes any car up. im yet to find one for my truck. but kennebell will have an upgrade available for me soon. then ill be no longer daily driver truck will get worse milage then the carbed bird will. btw bird will have 500+ponies to the fly. hoping 380 to the rears.
hemigtx001 is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 08:04 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
hemigtx001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: warren, mi
Posts: 301
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

so also what do you guys think of hte Magnum R/T's? some run 5.5 0-60
hemigtx001 is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 08:24 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
deadmeat2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 907
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

there a dodge...
deadmeat2004 is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 12:17 AM
  #23  
JCU
Registered User
 
JCU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Scranton, PA
Posts: 38
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

This may comes as a shock to you but an intake and exhaust will not take your whopping 160hp and 200 lbs of trq and turn it into a killer. You'd have difficulty with a Honda Civic yet alone a cammed 5.0L. Make sure you tell these Mustangs that you are actually attempting to race. If you honestly think your taking down all these Mustangs, by all means that's your right just don't get offended when people laugh.
JCU is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 02:30 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
vin1382's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 406
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

Originally Posted by hemigtx001
yes thats what im saying. btw the driver didnt know how to drive. lol. but the 5.0s arent all theya re cooked up to be unless they are modded up
4.6 = problem easyt o wake up as stated before. just finding the right intake and exhaust setup on any car can wake it up. but its really easy with the mustangs. now my 3.4 i feel is faster then my truck, and it takes 4.6s ont he highway. but my 3.4 is alot quicker off the line. and in the 1/2 shift. then my truck is. IMO. i fell strongly that a modded 3.4 vs a stock 5.0 a win for the fbody. ive also gone trhough two rearends. and a trans in my career. lol like i sadi i somehow foudn the right setup for my car. just tweeking it here and there. with alls tock internals. i could hang with a lt1 with intake, exhaust. up to 35-40 then it pulls away. Now What im doing with the Fbody now = not even svt can contain unless high pressure pulley. or mad a$$ investments into modding the motor even more then Ford does when they get hand built at the local romeo engine plant. and a v6 vs a cobra only mr DOOLITTLE can hold up on one of them. an dhes NA 11 second if im not mistaken.
you might be one of the dumbest people ever. no way in hell any v6 f-body with only intake and exhaust is hanging with an lt1 in decent condition downlow, uptop, anywhere. only if the lt1 was suffering from a low rpm stumble or something.

what the hell are you trying to say about cobras? that your v6 with an intake and exhaust can take any cobra unless they have a high pressure pully, and then only if he runs 11's? have you ever run at the track? do you think your 3.4 car with its magic exhaust and intake combo, is going to start running mid 14's?

this guy is hilarious.
vin1382 is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 05:07 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
deadmeat2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 907
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

deadmeat2004 is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 06:15 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
ImportKILLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: I'm in the Bay, Trick
Posts: 1,150
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

Nobody believes you and with good reason. Produce a timeslip...

Guys, stop shoveling fuel onto the BS fire...
ImportKILLER is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 07:53 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
hemigtx001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: warren, mi
Posts: 301
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

Originally Posted by vin1382
you might be one of the dumbest people ever. no way in hell any v6 f-body with only intake and exhaust is hanging with an lt1 in decent condition downlow, uptop, anywhere. only if the lt1 was suffering from a low rpm stumble or something.

what the hell are you trying to say about cobras? that your v6 with an intake and exhaust can take any cobra unless they have a high pressure pully, and then only if he runs 11's? have you ever run at the track? do you think your 3.4 car with its magic exhaust and intake combo, is going to start running mid 14's?

this guy is hilarious.
y dont u read what u quoted from me for a second. What im doing to my car will hang with cobra's. IN about 6 months after i get done with what im doing i wills moke cobra's. the only payment i will make just as i do now is my insurance. my vehicles are all payed off. also. THE TIHNG IM DOING DIMWAD is im putting a carbed 350 500+hp wiht a th350 trans into my firebird = Cobra eater. unless they are using a HIGH BOOST PULLEY. Also My v6 can hold its own. believe me its amazed many. ive seen even faster 3.4's out there. now the thing about MR doolittle is he has the fastest NA 3.4 if im not mistaken, he RUNS 11's WITH A V6 NA y dont you look him up, and read some of the info on him. Btw Lets take a ride in about three months. on a nice day. ill have a good looking vid on my site for once my cars done. for the new 0-60 times. and the new 0-100's shouldnt be to much lol. and the new quarter times. also ill have some other goodies on the site after imd one with the swap. Any one who wants to talk. can talk. i dont care what u say i know what my car did. ANY CAR CAN BE WOKEN UP JUST BY MAKING IT BREATH RIGHT. the main thing Ford does at the romeo plant is gets the motors to breath right tahts how they are getting over 400 hp to the fly. they advertise it at 390. Its actually an average of 410hp, all depends on who built the motor. some guys slap em together some take their time. some know what they are doing down toa science and every motor theyb uild puts out over 410hp. Its all about how it breaths. alot of 5.0's around her run mid 16's thats slow. my truck is slow. but then again i ran it in florida. and its used to less humidity and heat at which we have here in michigan. EVERything on my truck is controled by a computer. which is gay. and no place but jet has something for it and jet is gay. Ask ne comp techt hat works on cars = HAVOC on all ur parts. not hte best upgrade. btw as soon as i change rear gears in truck, and the bypass is out for the throttle control management system. ill be hitting high 14's to mid 14's btw my trucks not S/C'ed. and for being what it is thats a prettyq uick time. also to all you haters. keep hating. im glad i give you something to talk about. now heres something else to talk about. 350 Carbed, Th350 Trans. BMR suspension and Chassis parts. Lightweight and wieght reduction. Custom guage setup. custom fuel setup. 500+hp to the crank. 380+to the rears.
hemigtx001 is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 09:39 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
Klypto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,419
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

*flame suite on*

i LOVE camaros but this is a joke!

i had a 98 v6 before i got my z, my best friend has a 95 gt (5.0) and used to have a 97 GT, i will admit uptop they are dogs trying to swim, but off the line... he ripped me so bad off the line it wasnt even funny.... i know for a fact all he had was... cut off his cats, there was like 6 or 8 of them! and nittos... my v6 didnt even spin the tires.... so tires wernt a problem

mabe up TOP it could possibly be close, but i even doubt that.... he ran 14.7 in the 95gt, before he sold the 97gt he ran 13.7 but that was on a 125 shot(dry) and some other small things.... ~290 torque kills base v6 camaro off line under any circumstance unless my sister is driving it...

nuff said
cory
Klypto is offline  
Old 09-22-2004, 09:41 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
deadmeat2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 907
Re: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt

everybody...just quit replying to him...Lock the thread!!
deadmeat2004 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
canbaufo
Parts For Sale
7
05-25-2015 12:01 PM
MyShibbyZ28
Parts For Sale
0
02-14-2015 12:05 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
01-29-2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
01-11-2015 06:10 PM



Quick Reply: 99 v6 vs. 94 stock gt



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12 AM.