V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

95 camaro...removing EGR?

Old Mar 30, 2006 | 11:23 AM
  #1  
ROADRAGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 886
From: Lake Orion Mi
95 camaro...removing EGR?

I have all the EGR codes, so I am planning on just tearing it all out(no emissions here in MI). Has anyone done it, and if so, does it cause any problems besides throwing the code? The car has an OBD2 dataport...if that makes any difference.
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 08:13 PM
  #2  
jonathan_abilene's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 302
From: hell, Tx. USA
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

you might want to tune the EGR codes out (pcmforless.com or texas speed & performance can do that).
You might want to figure out a way to block off the egr with no leaks b4 you do it.


On second thought, why dont you just get a new EGR valve? that might fix it
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #3  
natural3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

do like I did take the egr out of the exhaust and route it to the intake. So all the valve does is suck in the intake charge instead of the exhaust. So far My engine light has stayed off.
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 04:38 PM
  #4  
HBHRacing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,109
From: Statesville NC
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

keeping the EGR functional would be a good idea. Less chance of detonation and lower CC temps.
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 05:01 PM
  #5  
jonathan_abilene's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 302
From: hell, Tx. USA
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

i really dont understand statements like that, I try to trust and believe them though.

I see intake air averaging around 40F-80F (depends on climate) colder than reused exhaust air (600F+++).
So how is exhaust air (600F) gonna lower CC temps and reduce detonation More so than intake air???????? I just dont get it

I know youre a real smart man HBH, I trust your good judgement..
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #6  
HBHRacing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,109
From: Statesville NC
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

It's the design of the EGR valve to cool CC temps which reduces the amount of Nox emissions. EGR return gasses might be a few hundred degrees, but you have to remember that CC temps are an awful lot more then that.
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 03:08 AM
  #7  
jonathan_abilene's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 302
From: hell, Tx. USA
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

but intake is cooler than recirculated exhaust
which would be less detonation
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #8  
natural3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

Yea, thats right the incoming air charge from the intake is always cooler that the exhaust charge, when the exhaust charge inters the intake it increases the air temp charge resulting in loss of horsepower. Also the main reason I did what I did, is because the exhaust charge has carbon and we all know what carbo does to a motor. So less intake temp and the less carbon in the intake equals a happy long living motor for me.
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 01:13 PM
  #9  
jonathan_abilene's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 302
From: hell, Tx. USA
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

exactly
or are we wrong HBH?
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 02:18 PM
  #10  
natural3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

I don't think so, I have racing experience from cars to engines and the worst thing for a car is carbon, and since the carbon only comes from the exhaust, the egr is the worst thing in history. the reason for it was to past emissions test and even now our cars pass inspection with the egr off. Mine did.
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 02:50 PM
  #11  
jonathan_abilene's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 302
From: hell, Tx. USA
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

you make me want to delete my EGR, but everyone says not to unless you have to!

PROS:
lower intake temps
no carbon
i would think better gas mileage
more HP
less chance of KR or detonation
1 lb less weight

cons:
worse emissions
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 04:51 PM
  #12  
HBHRacing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,109
From: Statesville NC
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

I'm not going to fight an uphill battle with people claiming that an EGR is the "worst thing in history" yet offer zero correct or even helpful information.

Your on your own.
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 02:20 AM
  #13  
jonathan_abilene's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 302
From: hell, Tx. USA
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

no I respect your opinion, i respect all the other GURU's opinions, but I just want a valid explanation
Its staying on until it dies...
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 10:40 AM
  #14  
natural3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

Well my explanation is simple about egrs, I have a better running engine with out it so i still am going with my opion. HBHracing you have good opions and I respect your decisions about egrs, But for guys like me who want all they can get out of their engine with basicly free modding the egr is the first thing to go.
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 02:31 PM
  #15  
jonathan_abilene's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 302
From: hell, Tx. USA
Re: 95 camaro...removing EGR?

Maybe I should half-way block off the egr
I dont live in Alaska, I dont really need a hot intake system filled with carbon(destroying the gaskets)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.