V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

3.4 horsepower increase

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #1  
arctic white 94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 106
3.4 horsepower increase

what are the best mods to do to a stock automatic 94 3.4 camaro to get more power and still keep it as a daily driver
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #2  
93 LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 131
From: Darien, IL
Thumbs down Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

I have done the follwing and from stock I felt a big difference.

K&N CAI ($289.99)
Pacestter 3.4L full cat-back ($400.00 installed)
J.E.T underdrive pulley ($69)
Stock LT1 one piece driveshaft ($10)
J.E.T. 160* thermostat ($15)

I used my 93 3.4 auto as an everyday driver as well. The car was a real turd stock..this woke it up.
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #3  
Black94Camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 120
From: Arizona
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

or....

Magnaflow Dual Exhaust

FIPK Cold Air Intake

Headers, but they are expensive.

Any mod is a daily driver....
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 04:35 PM
  #4  
tbird31's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 142
From: Charlotte, NC
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

93 LT1 you got any timeslips or know what it ran after you did all that?

I also have been looking for something to wake my slow a$$ car up...haha
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 04:53 PM
  #5  
MarcR94v6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,960
From: San Diego, CA
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

Wow, you found a driveshaft for $10!!!
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 08:44 PM
  #6  
93 LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 131
From: Darien, IL
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

Guys,
We are going back a while here. No times on my 93 3.4L but I can tell you that when I got it is was in mint shape but was a real turd. I mean slow as you can get. I seriously beleive the car was no quicker then my 91 Cavalier with the 2.2L.

It is still no rocket but it does move out 10x better with that stuff then when I got it.

The test vehicle was a 95 3.4L Camaro. Stock we ran a 16.3 I belive. After a pulley, CAI, 160thermo the car ran 15.9. This is WITH stock exhaust. I think my 93 is somewhere in the 15.7-8 range.

The driveshaft is stock steel one from a 94 LT1. Anything more then $10 and that is considered a rip-off!
Old Nov 27, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #7  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

Originally Posted by MarcR94v6
Wow, you found a driveshaft for $10!!!
Check out the Parts for Sale forum, I have seen several go for that price. When I upgrade mine, it will most likely go in the garbage can as ten bucks isn't worth my time to package and ship it.
Old Nov 27, 2005 | 05:50 PM
  #8  
transamtom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 906
From: niagara falls ont. canada
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

Originally Posted by MarcR94v6
Wow, you found a driveshaft for $10!!!
I got mine for free..... off my LT1
Old Nov 27, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #9  
MarcR94v6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,960
From: San Diego, CA
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

Yea, but wouldn't aluminum be better? I didn't know upgrading to an LT1 steel driveshaft would help.
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 03:31 PM
  #10  
93 LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 131
From: Darien, IL
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

I think that any type of reduction in rotating mass helps free up HP. Did you ever hold the stock 2-piece V6 driveshaft? Heavy. Yes, the 1LE 2.75" or 3" LS1 aluminum shaft would be better than the stock LT1 shaft...but that one is way better IMO then the V6 2-piece.

The stock V6 is a 2-piece because of the lentgh of the engine. Requires a more drastic angle then the V8 version (2-pieces allows this as there is another joint). However, I have had no problems for like 40K miles with the LT1 shaft.

I got mine from a local guy 5min from my house for $10. Took 10 minutes to install.
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 03:38 PM
  #11  
transamtom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 906
From: niagara falls ont. canada
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

Originally Posted by MarcR94v6
Yea, but wouldn't aluminum be better? I didn't know upgrading to an LT1 steel driveshaft would help.
Sure but the aluminum shaft is in my TA,my Firebird gets the hand me downs from the TA that way I can mod it on the cheap.

I have a set of 35/25 swaybars for the TA so the 'Bird will get the 32/21 combo,when I do the Bilsteins the "Bird will get the 45,000 mile shocks from the TA
Old Nov 28, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #12  
IdahoLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 233
From: Boise, ID
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

An aluminum driveshaft is also gonna cost some money. Ive seen them go from $300-800.
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:36 AM
  #13  
MarcR94v6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,960
From: San Diego, CA
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

(+/-)$10 driveshaft here I come! Along with TB bypass, 180* thermo, and water wetter, I'll be set.
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 11:38 AM
  #14  
njnick91's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1
Talking Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

ive got a 94 5spd

k&n cai
z28 exhuast system
5.7l coil packs
accel 8mm wires (instead of stock 7mm)
bosche copper plugs
lt1 1piece driveshaft
180 thermostat

after doing all this theres a def difference in power from when it was completely stock
Old Jan 24, 2013 | 11:03 AM
  #15  
bigz28man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 98
Re: 3.4 horsepower increase

I think you guys should think about this. The single most thing you can do with out making any modifications to your motor is, gears. Put a nice set of 3:73 gears in there, and your car will feel like you added a crazy amount of horsepower. Unfortunately there is not a whole lot of "bolt ons" ie: cai, exhaust, for these motors. Yes things look good on paper but by the time it gets to the the wheels..not much horsepower left. Yes weight reduction helps, but that can be costly. I heard some guys putting a nice set of flowing heads on but to really use those heads to fullest potential more bolt ons are needed. So again....look into gears.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.