Z28 VS M3 Roadster
Originally posted by Bora
Shocks were valved by Lou Gigliotti, they are supposed to match the Eibach's rate (both front and rear). Subframes were welded at Kenny Brown's shop in Indy. I spent quite of time/money on the car and attended many SCCA events both AutoX and RR. Don't get me wrong, car does handle well. I though that was great, until I moved to Germany 2 years ago and got the M3 there (May 2002). Z28 was in the garage in Ohio. Drove the M3 over a year in Germany (many trips to Hockenheimring) for the purpose it was built for. Many times 175+ mph sustained (155 mph limiter does not kick in). Then I moved back here and trying to enjoy the Z28 but the fun is just not there. I love the Z28 that is why I still have it. I am not some p&^ck M3 owner who is putting down fbodies. I am giving everyone an unbiased opinion. Spend some time behind the M3 for a while (not just a test drive) and then go back to fbody. And I also realize that we are comparing early 80s chassis technology with 2000s technology. Which is not fair. As for waving to let someone pass on the track doesn't necessarily displays the car's handling characteristics. I also waved quite of bit VW Golfs and Fiats on the track and let them pass instead of them barreling at me at the next hairpin.
Thanks for the handling info though. I think I still have that stock rear bar somewhere..
Shocks were valved by Lou Gigliotti, they are supposed to match the Eibach's rate (both front and rear). Subframes were welded at Kenny Brown's shop in Indy. I spent quite of time/money on the car and attended many SCCA events both AutoX and RR. Don't get me wrong, car does handle well. I though that was great, until I moved to Germany 2 years ago and got the M3 there (May 2002). Z28 was in the garage in Ohio. Drove the M3 over a year in Germany (many trips to Hockenheimring) for the purpose it was built for. Many times 175+ mph sustained (155 mph limiter does not kick in). Then I moved back here and trying to enjoy the Z28 but the fun is just not there. I love the Z28 that is why I still have it. I am not some p&^ck M3 owner who is putting down fbodies. I am giving everyone an unbiased opinion. Spend some time behind the M3 for a while (not just a test drive) and then go back to fbody. And I also realize that we are comparing early 80s chassis technology with 2000s technology. Which is not fair. As for waving to let someone pass on the track doesn't necessarily displays the car's handling characteristics. I also waved quite of bit VW Golfs and Fiats on the track and let them pass instead of them barreling at me at the next hairpin.
Thanks for the handling info though. I think I still have that stock rear bar somewhere..
i get pretty cranky when ppl say the fbod doesn't handle. all of the chassis mods i have done to mine are simple and not terribly expensive. you just gotta know where to spend your money to get the best out of the car. heck, just springs, shocks and a proper alignment will get you 50% of the way there.
i think the handling stuff is irrelevant to this post. both cars can be made to handle great and perform at a national level in autocross (FWIW when they are in the same class, SM, the m3 prevails)
however, implying that the more expensive (bmw whatever this guy raced) car sucks because it lost to a cheaper car (f-body) is ridiculous.
1) if someone has the resources to buy a late model m-series bimmer, they also have the resources to figure out that a camaro tends to be a better straight line performer and the resources to buy one. for all we know, that guy had a ss in his garage.
2) a lot (not all) of the people that laugh at beating the more expensive car are the same people that'll say "its still JUST a neon" or will say "well, we still got the better looking car, that thing is a bucket, i'd still take the camaro over it" when an f-body loses to a $3k primered sbc vega
however, implying that the more expensive (bmw whatever this guy raced) car sucks because it lost to a cheaper car (f-body) is ridiculous.
1) if someone has the resources to buy a late model m-series bimmer, they also have the resources to figure out that a camaro tends to be a better straight line performer and the resources to buy one. for all we know, that guy had a ss in his garage.
2) a lot (not all) of the people that laugh at beating the more expensive car are the same people that'll say "its still JUST a neon" or will say "well, we still got the better looking car, that thing is a bucket, i'd still take the camaro over it" when an f-body loses to a $3k primered sbc vega
We have to end this thread right now, this is gettting so off topic. The point of my story was that he taunted me and I ended up wooping his ***. The car was the car I said it was. And I thought that in a camaro forum people would just laugh because a cheaper car beat the more expensive car, like a beater sleeper car getting taunted by a fast flashy car, and losing. I was hoping for a couple if "nice kill" or "congrats on the win", not all this stupid sidetrack bullsh!t. I'm sorry I even posted in. Enough is Enough. Just let it go.
Well, lately this is just how the kills forum is. If you're not ready to argue about something, don't post a kill!! Not trying to be an ***, but there are asses on here who sidetrack your threads. Just a heads up.
John
John
In addition to the Z3s, BMW offers the M Coupe and M Roadster. Although these cars are in the M line with the five-seat M3 Coupe and Convertible, they're actually more like Z3s, using the same basic bodywork. If 225 horsepower isn't enough for you from the 3.0-liter Z3, the M is what you want, with a 3.2-liter engine producing a killer 315 horsepower. The Roadster sells for $45,990, including freight; the Coupe retails for $44,990.
-B
-B
For the price difference, I'd expect what you say to be true. Funny thing is, the newer model M3's actually don't handle as well as the model they replaced! Car and Driver named the previous model the "best driving car period"! That's a pretty big distinction.
Jason
Jason
Originally posted by Bora
Comparing M3 vs Z28 on the handling department:
I don't know what else does it take to get a Z28 to handle as good as the M3 (aside from all out race modifications). My 2002 M3 (6 speed) is totally stock. My 94 Z28 (also a 6 speed) has Eibach Pro springs, Bilstein HD Shocks, relocated battery, ST 35 mm solid front sway bar, 19 mm 1LE rear bar, LCAs with relocation brackets, adjustable panhard bar. Car has been put on a diet with many extras removed, battery has been relocated to rear passenger side. Corvette Z06 front brakes were added. Kenny Brown Double Diamong sub frame connectors were welded. Car is running on 17" Corvette GS wheels with 275 front 315 rear Dunlops. I still have excess body flex, unpredicted oversteer in addition to all the rough ride and noise. M3 still out brakes and out handles the Z28. Feels solid as it was carved out of single piece of titanium. Drive them both every week.
This is totally unbiased opinion. Just daily experiences..
Comparing M3 vs Z28 on the handling department:
I don't know what else does it take to get a Z28 to handle as good as the M3 (aside from all out race modifications). My 2002 M3 (6 speed) is totally stock. My 94 Z28 (also a 6 speed) has Eibach Pro springs, Bilstein HD Shocks, relocated battery, ST 35 mm solid front sway bar, 19 mm 1LE rear bar, LCAs with relocation brackets, adjustable panhard bar. Car has been put on a diet with many extras removed, battery has been relocated to rear passenger side. Corvette Z06 front brakes were added. Kenny Brown Double Diamong sub frame connectors were welded. Car is running on 17" Corvette GS wheels with 275 front 315 rear Dunlops. I still have excess body flex, unpredicted oversteer in addition to all the rough ride and noise. M3 still out brakes and out handles the Z28. Feels solid as it was carved out of single piece of titanium. Drive them both every week.
This is totally unbiased opinion. Just daily experiences..
Dude, this is the net......you're taking it waaayyy to seriously. Also, look at the sigs of the guys posting...most of the guys giving you sh*t don't even own an F body.
Btw, you listed your kill as an M3 roadster (which doesn't exist per se), but posted links to the M Roadster.....2 different cars.
Jason
Btw, you listed your kill as an M3 roadster (which doesn't exist per se), but posted links to the M Roadster.....2 different cars.
Jason
Originally posted by 1998__Z/28
We have to end this thread right now, this is gettting so off topic. The point of my story was that he taunted me and I ended up wooping his ***. The car was the car I said it was. And I thought that in a camaro forum people would just laugh because a cheaper car beat the more expensive car, like a beater sleeper car getting taunted by a fast flashy car, and losing. I was hoping for a couple if "nice kill" or "congrats on the win", not all this stupid sidetrack bullsh!t. I'm sorry I even posted in. Enough is Enough. Just let it go.
We have to end this thread right now, this is gettting so off topic. The point of my story was that he taunted me and I ended up wooping his ***. The car was the car I said it was. And I thought that in a camaro forum people would just laugh because a cheaper car beat the more expensive car, like a beater sleeper car getting taunted by a fast flashy car, and losing. I was hoping for a couple if "nice kill" or "congrats on the win", not all this stupid sidetrack bullsh!t. I'm sorry I even posted in. Enough is Enough. Just let it go.
like a beater sleeper car getting taunted by a fast flashy car, and losing.
It is all in the individual's perception...
For the price difference, I'd expect what you say to be true. Funny thing is, the newer model M3's actually don't handle as well as the model they replaced! Car and Driver named the previous model the "best driving car period"! That's a pretty big distinction.
I used to own a 1996 328IS. Steering response was excellent. Handled great, then I drove a 1995 318IS. With only 4 cylinders there was not much power (118hp) but handled even better than the 328! Because of the light weight engine. These cars were all stock with BMW handling option. E36 cars are lighter than the E46 cars and handle great. E46 chassis is lot stiffer than E36 and is a better platform for serious suspension. E46 M3 does not have as good steering feel as E36, but it does handle. Car & Driver (or R&D, etc) keep selecting E46 M3 as one of the best cars ever built.
Originally posted by Beanboy
In addition to the Z3s, BMW offers the M Coupe and M Roadster. Although these cars are in the M line with the five-seat M3 Coupe and Convertible, they're actually more like Z3s, using the same basic bodywork. If 225 horsepower isn't enough for you from the 3.0-liter Z3, the M is what you want, with a 3.2-liter engine producing a killer 315 horsepower. The Roadster sells for $45,990, including freight; the Coupe retails for $44,990.
-B
In addition to the Z3s, BMW offers the M Coupe and M Roadster. Although these cars are in the M line with the five-seat M3 Coupe and Convertible, they're actually more like Z3s, using the same basic bodywork. If 225 horsepower isn't enough for you from the 3.0-liter Z3, the M is what you want, with a 3.2-liter engine producing a killer 315 horsepower. The Roadster sells for $45,990, including freight; the Coupe retails for $44,990.
-B
Nice cars, but hardly "killer" in the hp category.
Rich Krause
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM
dbusch22
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
Jan 5, 2015 07:14 PM



