Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

VID:LT1 versus 3V GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #16  
DarkHorse's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,433
From: Akron, Ohio
Originally Posted by SSlither
Not a shot stock....plain and simple.

His wifes GT traps 103 - the same as my 240rwhp Mustang, I run 13.12@103 with a 1.95 60'



So, why couldn't the new GT run that?
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #17  
1BadAzzGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 77
From: Pasadena, Md, USA
Originally Posted by DarkHorse
His wifes GT traps 103 - the same as my 240rwhp Mustang, I run 13.12@103 with a 1.95 60'



So, why couldn't the new GT run that?
Because this is a Fbody site? LOL
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 05:26 PM
  #18  
DarkHorse's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,433
From: Akron, Ohio
No time to make a new page

http://media.putfile.com/D42---Fathers-Day

86 GT
302 AOD
pullies
converter
4.10 gear
shorty headers
h pipe
cat back
aluminum radiator
explorer intake
Twisted wedge heads
1.6 rockers
lower control arms
strange 10 adjustable shocks
coilovers
summit wheels

ran a best on fathers day (3350 da) at dragway 42 (See video above).

Added
Summit wheels
Summit 70mm throttle body

Yesterday

Went to the track today and ran 12.94@105 (3355 DA)







It's always at Dragway 42
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 07:36 PM
  #19  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
SSlither first thanks for the english lesson, 2nd you must be watching some bad drivers. The electronic nanny hurts the new GT's, similar to the GTO's...w/ a flash they can easily run low 13's...so ill tell you what even though not stock bring a stock LT1 w/ a tune and run a flashed newer GT and see what happens...and btw even without the flash the GT will still beat up a LT1 in the right hands.
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 07:48 PM
  #20  
oneclean97z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 301
From: North Houston, TX
anyone notice how the ls1 isn't even in play right now? lol
Old Jul 8, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #21  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
Originally Posted by oneclean97z
anyone notice how the ls1 isn't even in play right now? lol
Yea, reason is the thread starter showed a video of a 3v running a LT1
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #22  
oneclean97z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 301
From: North Houston, TX
yea i know i just mentioned that cause it seemed to be heading towards another camaro/stang arguement and wanted to contribute lol
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #23  
lovescamaros25's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 153
That was the whole intention(lol)
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #24  
oneclean97z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 301
From: North Houston, TX
we should unite against the civics integras eclipses evos stis rx8s and 350zs running around and show them they are living in america which means american cars should rule, at least somewhat
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #25  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
Originally Posted by oneclean97z
we should unite against the civics integras eclipses evos stis rx8s and 350zs running around and show them they are living in america which means american cars should rule, at least somewhat
Only one I like out of that bunch is the evo , you can have the rest...Gotta give credit where credits due the Evo 9's a bad little 4 cyclinder.
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #26  
Demon's Camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 234
From: Syracuse NY
Umm..... we do and WILL rule! We have the Shelby SuperSnake coming along with the supercharged vette, and the possibility for a SC camaro.

The only car by then that will have a shot in the dark will be the GT-R.
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 07:40 PM
  #27  
1BadAzzGT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 77
From: Pasadena, Md, USA
Originally Posted by SSlither
Would it make you feel better if I came to your site and said the same thing? It has nothing to do with what site I'm on..........but I'm sure you already knew that!
Oh come on .......surely can you take a joke, right? I've owned almost all of the "Brands" including Chebby. If you want to come over to a rustang site and say stuff... more power to ya.
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 08:20 PM
  #28  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Horespower just had a new Mustang GT on their dyno and it put down 260 rwhp / 290 rqtq.

That's about identical to typical LT1 numbers. (255/290)

I think the new GT has a slight edge on the LT1, but it's still a drivers race.

Dan
Old Jul 11, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #29  
CANTONRACER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,764
From: North Canton, OH
Sounds a little low...my wife's put down stock to the paper filter the numbers in the sig. Maybe Mustang dyno vs. Dynojet?

I went to the track with a few buds in f-bods...an LT1 with a catback/CAI and a bone stock LS1.

The LT1 A4 ran a best of 14.26@97.99 which corrects to a 13.79@101.45 which I feel is about right in this area.

The LS1 A4 ran a best of 13.98@101.09 which corrects to 13.52@104.42 which is what I would expect from an LS1.

My wifes GT ran a best of 13.76@103.22 (uncorrected) the same night in the same weather.
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 05:08 AM
  #30  
bombebomb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,855
From: Ohio
I see you went to the steel valley supernationals this year, I went last year, I was going to go this year and run the car a few times, but the money was not there.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.