Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #31  
falchulk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,881
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

[QUOTE=Sephiroth]
Originally Posted by LT1ponykilla
I could care less if it has 4.10's. Its not going to rev that fast and jump out on a car that SHOULD smoke its *** without some happy gas. If the cars were really that close in hp it wouldve been a slight pull but not damn 2-3 cars. Thats BS! Both cars are close in weight and hp so neither one shouldve really beat the other. I still say the Mach had some juice up its sleeve or something.

QUOTE]

There's also another video you guys might wanna search on there an cry about. It's a guy with a bolt on 2v, no FI, taking a bolt on LS1.
Hell, GT's dont need any kind of power adder to run 12's, and people are doing it.
And this is a Mach..........I love both cars, but you LS1 worshippers are funny
There should be a rule that Crackheads should not post right after taking a hit. No mustang GT is getting anywhere near 12's without serious work or a power adder. The Mach SHOULD have won this. There no question in my mind that he should be at least .5 quicker the the SS if he SS did not hav a stall.
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 10:33 PM
  #32  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

Originally Posted by falchulk
No mustang GT is getting anywhere near 12's without serious work or a power adder.

http://forums.modulardepot.com/showt...?threadid=1877
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 10:37 PM
  #33  
falchulk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,881
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

And? To that I say, where are they all at? Even your car with slicks does not hit 12's right? If that were possible, the ls1's should all be hitting deep 12's. The internet is full of stories, dont put faith in them all.
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 10:40 PM
  #34  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

Originally Posted by falchulk
And? To that I say, where are they all at? Even your car with slicks does not hit 12's right? If that were possible, the ls1's should all be hitting deep 12's. The internet is full of stories, dont put faith in them all.
Read the whole thread, plenty of guys there with those mods hit 12s. Stock GTs have gone 13.6s. I don't know what my car with slicks would hit. The cars they were talking about had more mods than mine. I've seen LS1s with slicks, gears and bolt ons hitting deep 12s. I don't put faith in them all, but this one I do.

Last edited by Steve Y; Jul 24, 2004 at 10:43 PM.
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #35  
BirchMan98z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 969
From: St. Louis, MO
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

lol I'd love to run into that mach 1 guy on the street. In fact, a lot of the new mach 1 drivers are very cocky like that, I've been noticing--- but not so much after I race them.
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 11:42 PM
  #36  
6speedZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 566
From: North Carolina
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

Originally Posted by Steve Y
Wtf? So no two cars can ever race unless they have the same exact mods? What a boring world that would be and we could predict the outcome 99% of the time. That's the fun of racing, seeing what mods it takes for a slower stock car to keep up with a faster stock or modded car.
Well obviously you feel this way, just the other day you posted about how you ripped a VW bug a new one
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 12:14 AM
  #37  
warwickbass's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 501
From: Pearland, Tx
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

A lot of those Mustang times in the sigs seem awfully LOW.
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 03:11 AM
  #38  
bombd84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 211
From: College Station, Austin, TX
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

There has to be some explanation at the video, cause I have destroyed mach 1's at the track and on the highway with equal more/less mods then the one in the video. This summer the 6+ times i have been to the track I have yet to see a mach 1 run less then .5 seconds behind me. I am not worried at all about the video, cause I know what the results are whit two properly running cars.
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 03:22 AM
  #39  
techie36's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 62
From: Milwaukee, WI
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

I'm getting really sick of hearing how the LS1 won't lose mod for mod to a mach 1 with shorter gears and an engine that loves to rev. Mach 1's are running LS1 times consistently, why don't some of you just accept it...the LS1 is no longer the unchallenged king of the street in stock-trim. Both are amazing engines, give credit where credit is due.
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 09:58 AM
  #40  
6speedZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 566
From: North Carolina
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

Originally Posted by techie36
I'm getting really sick of hearing how the LS1 won't lose mod for mod to a mach 1 with shorter gears and an engine that loves to rev. Mach 1's are running LS1 times consistently, why don't some of you just accept it...the LS1 is no longer the unchallenged king of the street in stock-trim. Both are amazing engines, give credit where credit is due.
So let me get this straight, your sick of hearing people talk about how the LS1 f-body is superior to a mustang? Well I hate to break it to ya but this is a site for F-BODIES !!!!! Ya don't like it then leave. I however will give the guy props for beating the Camaro...however anybody with half a brain knows that the Camaro should not have lost that badly so driver error was probably a factor. However on the streets anything goes. I think the Camaro was an auto, and in that case the driver of the said Camaro is a dumbass. He dropped down almost instantly and I think it was from his car down shifting.
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 12:13 PM
  #41  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

Originally Posted by 6speedZ28
Well obviously you feel this way, just the other day you posted about how you ripped a VW bug a new one
Yep, and 3 months ago I posted how a CRX with a built 2.4 liter motor ripped me to shreds (to the tune of 20+ cars) w/o his nitrous.
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 12:21 PM
  #42  
techie36's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 62
From: Milwaukee, WI
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

Originally Posted by 6speedZ28
So let me get this straight, your sick of hearing people talk about how the LS1 f-body is superior to a mustang? Well I hate to break it to ya but this is a site for F-BODIES !!!!! Ya don't like it then leave. I however will give the guy props for beating the Camaro...however anybody with half a brain knows that the Camaro should not have lost that badly so driver error was probably a factor. However on the streets anything goes. I think the Camaro was an auto, and in that case the driver of the said Camaro is a dumbass. He dropped down almost instantly and I think it was from his car down shifting.
Just because this is a site for F-bodies doesn't mean it's an escape from reality...well maybe for some of you
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 02:27 PM
  #43  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

Originally Posted by techie36
I'm getting really sick of hearing how the LS1 won't lose mod for mod to a mach 1 with shorter gears and an engine that loves to rev. Mach 1's are running LS1 times consistently, why don't some of you just accept it...the LS1 is no longer the unchallenged king of the street in stock-trim. Both are amazing engines, give credit where credit is due.
Where are the 108-109 mph BONE STOCK Mach 1s? We all know there have been a number of bone stock LS1s trapping 108-109 and I have yet to see a Mach 1 trap that high. That doesn't mean they haven't, I'm just not aware of any.

Mach 1s are very close to LS1s in performance, but I still think LS1s have an edge. 350-360 hp vs. 320 hp, better gearing and similar weight. I really like the Mach 1s and what Ford is doing in general.
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 05:31 PM
  #44  
techie36's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 62
From: Milwaukee, WI
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

Originally Posted by 97bowtie
Where are the 108-109 mph BONE STOCK Mach 1s? We all know there have been a number of bone stock LS1s trapping 108-109 and I have yet to see a Mach 1 trap that high. That doesn't mean they haven't, I'm just not aware of any.

Mach 1s are very close to LS1s in performance, but I still think LS1s have an edge. 350-360 hp vs. 320 hp, better gearing and similar weight. I really like the Mach 1s and what Ford is doing in general.
Those LS1's that trapped 108-109 "bone stock" were the 2000-2002's, show me a first or 2nd year LS1 with those numbers...give the mach 1 more than a few months in production to pull out some impressive numbers The first year production models aren't even all out yet.
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 05:42 PM
  #45  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
Re: SS Camaro VS 04 Mach 1 Video

Originally Posted by techie36
Those LS1's that trapped 108-109 "bone stock" were the 2000-2002's, show me a first or 2nd year LS1 with those numbers...give the mach 1 more than a few months in production to pull out some impressive numbers The first year production models aren't even all out yet.
http://www.stangbangers.com/01_Bullitt_Article2.htm

Scroll down a little. Evan Smith ran a 12.8 @ 108 in a bone stock '99 Z28. That's a Mustang magazine...you gonna say they are biased and the times aren't real? 108 mph has been attained many times in stock LS1s. I was asking if any Mach 1s has trapped 108-109 bone stock. Can you provide ONE example? I don't want to see what they have done with an x-pipe, intake, etc. This was a showroom stock LS1. It has been proven many times that LS1s are capable of running these times stock.

I wasn't bashing the Mach 1s...read my post dumb****.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 PM.