LT1 vs. '00 GT differences
Sorry this isn't a track story, but I wasn't sure where to put this. Thing is, I used to drive a 00 Performance Red Mustang GT with a 5-speed. The thing was awesome especially after a put straight pipes in it
. However, when I got my current car i decided to go where the power was
. My question is: I've noticed that when racing the GT the revs would stay up there around 6 grand between shifts, but with the firebird the revs drop like a rock(gives a nice WAAAH sound IMHO), why is that? Is my car really fighting for air up there compared with the mod motor or is it a difference in flywheel weights? I know this is kindof a strange question but its been bothering me for awhile.
BTW, if you were looking for a kill story, I once raced a friends 00 GT vertible with intake, chip, gears, and exhaust, and absolutely started walking him once I hit 2nd, and this was before the headers.
. However, when I got my current car i decided to go where the power was
. My question is: I've noticed that when racing the GT the revs would stay up there around 6 grand between shifts, but with the firebird the revs drop like a rock(gives a nice WAAAH sound IMHO), why is that? Is my car really fighting for air up there compared with the mod motor or is it a difference in flywheel weights? I know this is kindof a strange question but its been bothering me for awhile. BTW, if you were looking for a kill story, I once raced a friends 00 GT vertible with intake, chip, gears, and exhaust, and absolutely started walking him once I hit 2nd, and this was before the headers.
Re: LT1 vs. '00 GT differences
It's probably the computer in the LT1 letting the revs drop quick and the computer in the 4.6 holding the revs longer. That's funny how you pounded that GT so bad in your LT1. Sounds like the GT driver sucks. Stock for stock those cars are good, close races.
Last edited by Steve Y; Aug 26, 2004 at 11:06 PM.
Re: LT1 vs. '00 GT differences
I believe this is due to the overhead cam setup. My buddies old 98 GT, he could sit there, with it in park, rev it, and it would take 4-5 seconds to come back down to idle (it would idle down in the 4-5 seconds), however i could sit beside him in my LT1, and rev mine up, and down 2-3 times while he was waiting on his to idle down. I could be wrong, but its what we came up with for an excuse, lol.
Re: LT1 vs. '00 GT differences
Originally Posted by Black00SS
I believe this is due to the overhead cam setup. My buddies old 98 GT, he could sit there, with it in park, rev it, and it would take 4-5 seconds to come back down to idle (it would idle down in the 4-5 seconds), however i could sit beside him in my LT1, and rev mine up, and down 2-3 times while he was waiting on his to idle down. I could be wrong, but its what we came up with for an excuse, lol.
Re: LT1 vs. '00 GT differences
A few tenths, but noticable. I'm not at all saying the GTs are slow, btw. Just the LT1 would be the clear victor. I don't remember if I had ever raced a new 4.6L GT. Whatever. No big deal.
Re: LT1 vs. '00 GT differences
Originally Posted by warwickbass
A few tenths, but noticable. I'm not at all saying the GTs are slow, btw. Just the LT1 would be the clear victor. I don't remember if I had ever raced a new 4.6L GT. Whatever. No big deal.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM



It's better to quote something then respond so we know what you are talking about.
