LT1 takes down ANOTHER GT.....

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 18, 2003 | 07:45 AM

#16

magius231

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 956

From: Winston Salem, NC

I used to own a 95 GT 'Vert...really nice car, and probably way better built than my current 95 T/A, but it was also a good bit slower. After doing lots of research on www.corral.net I came to the conclusion that I was going to have to do some sort of forced induction to really get a lot out of it, or I would be stuck in the 12's forever. For those that don't know, a 94-95 GT 'Vert was pretty much the heaviest/slowest Mustang with a 5.0 you could buy

One thing I will say though, parts were a HELLUVA lot cheaper than for my T/A, and there were tons of aftermarket appearance parts which was nice...

Nov 18, 2003 | 11:49 AM

#17

FastWhiteTA

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 537

From: Was TX, now in Portland, OR

I've ridden in several mid 90s GTs, and newer ones...and the mid 90s GTs didn't seem built any better than my T/A, in fact they felt sloppy and slow on top of sloppy. Rattles everywhere, mine doesn't have any rattles.

Nov 18, 2003 | 01:47 PM

#18

FastWhiteTA

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 537

From: Was TX, now in Portland, OR

Quote:

Originally posted by Steve Y
People surely don't buy Camaros and Mustangs for build quality and reliability. They both suck compared to imports and European cars as far as build quality and reliability is concerned. They buy them for cheap speed, good torquey V8 engines, and American heritage.

True True