Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

Lost to a cobra :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2007, 09:42 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Greed4Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: FTW, TX
Posts: 4,508
Originally Posted by reamo04
to most mustang owners (that ive ever met) "stock" refers to gears, shiftkit/stall (if auto), bolt ons, and occaisionally heads.
So true. There is a guy I talked to who has a Mach 1 that was bragging about beating stock LS1's. He said all he had was intake and catback. Come to find out he was full bolt on w/4.11's out back. Guess they have to think this way to be competitive though.


On a side note, I ran a SC'd (who knows what else, but thats all the guy said) 93 Cobra back when I just had a lid, catback and some suspension mods. He only pulled a length when we got on it and I spun (worthless Kumho 712's!) and that is the only ground he gained. SC'd engine vs. NA engine w/mild bolt ons..that isn't too impressive.
Greed4Speed is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 11:43 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
chevy rules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 67
was he a auto? Looks like you have a m6? I too have a m6. While its a lot of fun its hard to beat a nice tight hard shifting auto! He doesn't have to let off the gas!! I had some close races in my old 76 camaro that I won with my t400 auto.
chevy rules is offline  
Old 01-09-2007, 02:59 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
scott9050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Panhandle of West Virginia
Posts: 1,548
Originally Posted by SSlither
my 95' GT I estimated around 275 hp, barely ran 14's, with multiple drivers attempting.
Then there was something wrong with it. My mark VIII did mid 14's with 220 RWHP and a 4236 lb weight with me in it, this with an auto and an open 3.07 rear.
A 94-95 Cobra with just a PCM tune to get rid of the annoying timing pull on full throttle shifts will run around 14 flat.
scott9050 is offline  
Old 01-09-2007, 03:02 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Camarocracy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 992
Stock 5.0=Cat-back exhaust, x/h-pipe, cold air intake, underdrive pully, headers, 3.73/4.11 gears, short shifter, 1.6 roller rockers, computer tune.
Camarocracy is offline  
Old 01-09-2007, 09:31 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
User56898's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Jersey
Posts: 368
Originally Posted by micfly83
I feel like I have failed the camaro community.
in my book you made us proud.....

honest, clean, fun, race....just should be on track but thats just me
User56898 is offline  
Old 01-09-2007, 10:51 PM
  #21  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
micfly83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 343
Yea i'm not too hot on street racin. I've seen people die from it. But sometimes you just gotta go.

I try and keep it to small back roads that I know real well

with no hidden driveways or side streets for that matter

I just wish I coulda kept with him better
micfly83 is offline  
Old 01-10-2007, 10:09 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
SnakeSkinner28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 376
First I'm sure that Cobra had more mods then he was saying, however the odds of him having nitrous are slim to no chance at all. The 5.0 Cobras had an underrated 240HP, all he needs to beat that Camaro is simple bolt ons, because what mods does that Camaro really have other then a cold air, cutout, and totally unnecessary 315 tires. The heads on the Cobra flow much better then stock LT1 heads, hence another reason he was pulling away at higher speeds. Dont attribute every loss to a Mustang as oh they have to have NOS or something, christ it was a modded Cobra vs a basically stock LT1.
SnakeSkinner28 is offline  
Old 01-10-2007, 02:09 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Mikie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Belmont North Carolina.
Posts: 594
Originally Posted by micfly83
But I forgot to mention that my friend pointed out he had a GT bumper.
Quick you are to roll your eyes young Skywalker. Faith , none you have.

The 95 Cobras came with Mustang enscribed into the rear end bumpers. Only in 96 did they change over to the Cobra inset. So yes, It was infact a Cobra you raced.
All Cobras are 5 / 6 speed manual cars as well. Never has been an auto Cobra.

Hope I shed some light on that.

good run nonetheless.
Mikie is offline  
Old 01-10-2007, 02:16 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
Mikie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Belmont North Carolina.
Posts: 594
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by SnakeSkinner28
First I'm sure that Cobra had more mods then he was saying, however the odds of him having nitrous are slim to no chance at all. The 5.0 Cobras had an underrated 240HP, all he needs to beat that Camaro is simple bolt ons, because what mods does that Camaro really have other then a cold air, cutout, and totally unnecessary 315 tires. The heads on the Cobra flow much better then stock LT1 heads, hence another reason he was pulling away at higher speeds. Dont attribute every loss to a Mustang as oh they have to have NOS or something, christ it was a modded Cobra vs a basically stock LT1.


The above mentioned is probably the most accurate information given.
Mikie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blac94Z
Drivetrain
5
11-04-2015 01:59 PM
WobblySausage
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
10-07-2015 02:44 PM
9t4lt4z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
10-02-2015 10:28 AM
HAWG
Drag Racing Technique
2
09-25-2015 11:41 AM



Quick Reply: Lost to a cobra :(



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 AM.