Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

Got beat by a 4 cylinder

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 11:17 AM
  #16  
Sax1031's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 604
From: Elgin,SC
Yea Steve Y got it right.

150+wheel hp and only about 600 lbs of weight = moving pretty fast.

Also I am with him on the G-tech thing. I have the newer G-tech competition meter and it is usually dead on when I test at the track.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 11:19 AM
  #17  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by Sax1031
Yea Steve Y got it right.

150+wheel hp and only about 600 lbs of weight = moving pretty fast.

Also I am with him on the G-tech thing. I have the newer G-tech competition meter and it is usually dead on when I test at the track.
Crotch rockets are the only way to fly for cheap speed! The only reason in the world I don't have one is safety. I get hurt every time I get on one.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 12:24 PM
  #18  
SergioEK9B18C5turbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4
From: San Pedro, CA
Originally posted by N2OpwrdTA
LOL.....funny to see the first person to post(a diss) about a 95mph trap speed is a Ricer. Sergio...hows it feel to actually trap more than someone for once

I agree 95 isnt good, but....would you REALLY rather be doing it in a honda

A 8sec ricer....is still a ricer. There just isnt much pride to be had in sitting at a stoplight in import ****ters, or racing them....let the flames begin, HA!
Your ignorance is pretty easy to see so I will let it be.....

For the rest who want to talk ****....I still trap 97-98@ 3000ft on the old mods.....which is to say higher than most LT1's here

Run what you brung Steve who give a **** want who runs stock anyway.....isnt that the point of mod'ing the car?

I swear youd think some of these guys REALLY beleive driving an F-Body is THAT much better than a quicker import

MaD dOmEsTiC pOWa yO....i'S be tRiZaPiN nInE-5 yO iN mY mAdD tIiIte f-bOd = Not so much .....

Lastly TAKE A ****IN JOKE IF YOU WANNA PLAY

= for jackasses that cant take it like they want to give it
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 02:28 PM
  #19  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
Originally posted by SergioEK9B18C5turbo
Your ignorance is pretty easy to see so I will let it be.....

For the rest who want to talk ****....I still trap 97-98@ 3000ft on the old mods.....which is to say higher than most LT1's here

Run what you brung Steve who give a **** want who runs stock anyway.....isnt that the point of mod'ing the car?

I swear youd think some of these guys REALLY beleive driving an F-Body is THAT much better than a quicker import

MaD dOmEsTiC pOWa yO....i'S be tRiZaPiN nInE-5 yO iN mY mAdD tIiIte f-bOd = Not so much .....

Lastly TAKE A ****IN JOKE IF YOU WANNA PLAY

= for jackasses that cant take it like they want to give it
There are PLENTY of bone stock LT1s that trap 100-102. Nobody is impressed by your car. Ironic that you didn't quote people w/fast cars and **** talk them.

Corrected, my car runs a 12.2 @ 114 or so...does that mean my car runs that?? NO - cause I have never ran it at sea level in cool weather.

You told Steve to run what ya brung - too bad you're only bringing a 97 mph trap speed. Or are you talking in hypothetical terms - in which case you are bringing a 100 mph trap speed?

Your first post wasn't a joke - don't pretend it was.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 02:34 PM
  #20  
SergioEK9B18C5turbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4
From: San Pedro, CA
Its a POS 4 banger remember I can diss all I want....95 trap is a 95 trap.....a 5.7L V8 should be traping above that....if not ....its something to laugh at and if you cant laugh REMOVE THE FOREIGN OBJECT FROM YOUR ASSumption

IF a cavalier runs his mouth about smoking Honda's all the while traping the powerful 95mph trap I would make fun just the same

The F-body can nEvAr LoSe

I swear for people that arent affected by quick imports they sure do receive alot of heartburn when a slow F-body is pointed out

I salute you defenders of the 95mph trap....may your 14 sec V8's be all that they can be .....Jesus whats next....defend a 2.7 60' because its "stock"
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 02:52 PM
  #21  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
Man, you have a bad case of import inferiority complex. Always have something to prove. Be happy with your slow car, and let him be happy with his.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 02:53 PM
  #22  
SergioEK9B18C5turbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4
From: San Pedro, CA
Originally posted by 97bowtie
There are PLENTY of bone stock LT1s that trap 100-102. Nobody is impressed by your car. Ironic that you didn't quote people w/fast cars and **** talk them.

Corrected, my car runs a 12.2 @ 114 or so...does that mean my car runs that?? NO - cause I have never ran it at sea level in cool weather.

Your first post wasn't a joke - don't pretend it was.
As far as I can tell its not the 105mph trap guys saying "I have never lost to an import" or even better "I am undefeated"

95mph trap = Slow...at sea level...SLOW whether its a Honda, Toyota, Chevy whatever....

He was joking about a civic needing nAwS so would point out that SLOW cars regardless of badge shouldnt be putting others who can beat them.....I can see it now...the mighty 85mph trap 3rd gen...."but at least I drive a camaro" Thats down right ridiculous......

I dont need you to be impressed with anything anyway....you probaly know very little about Honda's so how could you even begin to tell me what I "should" be running with my setup? So stick to your ignorance and spew it some more to make yourself feel better....either way I am not impressed by you either.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 02:56 PM
  #23  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
I know all I need to know about Hondas. I respect fast imports done tastefully. Unfortunately, yours isn't fast. Good day.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 03:53 PM
  #24  
SergioEK9B18C5turbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4
From: San Pedro, CA
Originally posted by Steve Y
This is why you get so much crap on this board. You are dissing a stock LT1 with 2.73s that ran 14.4 at 95 on a crappy track. That is one of the slowest automatic LT1s ever with crappy gears. What did your turd run stock again? What would your turd run stock with an automatic and 2.73 gears? That's right you never told us. You are trying to compare your motor swapped car to a stock automatic crappy geared car. For the record, GMhightechperf got a 13.8 at 99 out of a stock LT1, automatic with 2.73s! You want us to all bow down to you because you did all this work to a pos and run fast LT1 times. Not going to happen!!!!!!!
Steve I dont need anybody to bow down because I wouldnt want them as subjects anyways....I prefer people who actually use their brains

SO now we are mag racing huh?

Its slow...the end....if you are butthurt about it...I DONT CARE
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 03:59 PM
  #25  
SergioEK9B18C5turbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4
From: San Pedro, CA
Originally posted by 97bowtie
I know all I need to know about Hondas. I respect fast imports done tastefully. Unfortunately, yours isn't fast. Good day.
Then why do you respect a 95mph trap? Oh thats right because its an F-body Such an open mind ......

Double standards indeed

Just so we all know what your defenition of "fast" is...please enlighten the rest of us so we can start grouping them by your standards
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 04:11 PM
  #26  
97bowtie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
Originally posted by SergioEK9B18C5turbo
Then why do you respect a 95mph trap? Oh thats right because its an F-body Such an open mind ......

Double standards indeed

Just so we all know what your defenition of "fast" is...please enlighten the rest of us so we can start grouping them by your standards
I never said I respected a 95 mph trap...did I? Please, quote it in your next reply...I want to see it. Not respecting it and ripping on the guy for having ran an abnormally slow mph are two different things. It's your attitude I don't respect. MY definition of fast is just that...MY definition of fast. If you think your car is fast, more power to you - you will be easier satisfied than the rest of us.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 04:31 PM
  #27  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by SergioEK9B18C5turbo
Steve I dont need anybody to bow down because I wouldnt want them as subjects anyways....I prefer people who actually use their brains

Then why are you here on this board? Everybody here is brainless, right? Why waste time talking to brainless people?

SO now we are mag racing huh?

So if it was done in a mag there is zero crediblility, right?

Its slow...the end....if you are butthurt about it...I DONT CARE
95 is a slow trap for a stock LT1, so what. Maybe it was a bad track or a hot day or above sea level.

HOW FAST WOULD YOUR TURD BE IF IT WAS STOCK, HAD AN AUTOMATIC AND 2.73 GEARS? Go ahead, hide from the question, because you can't handle the answer. Like anybody on this board really cares what you think. Butthurt, interesting choice of words. Now why would you be thinking of that word, wait I don't want to know.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 04:37 PM
  #28  
1990 Turbo Grand Prix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 764
From: Crystal Falls, MI USA

I love coming to the kills section!
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 04:42 PM
  #29  
95 WHITE TRANS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 309
Me too.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #30  
Kris93/95Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
From: Bentonville, AR
Sergio you have a few things wrong.
First off, the comment was a joke. I respect any car that is quick import or domestic. If I was the type of blind A-hole that thought all that was out was F-body cars then why would I come and proclaim a loss. It wasn't the first and surely won't be the last.

As far as get some mods? What does that mean? A stock LT1 car is more than enough to handle 99% of the stuff on the road. The 95 will never be modified (other than the tint) as long as I own it, I have a car I throw money into. I have raced Honda/Acura's Best with the 95 Z28, RSX Type-S, Civic Si, Integra Type R, S2000, etc....and have never lost to a Honda/Acura. Unless Fly-Bys Count?

Not saying that my car is faster than ALL of the Cars like that in the world, and not saying they possibly didn't have the worst drivers ever, but as far as the cars history goes mods aren't needed yet I 'm sure I just haven't found the right car yet, but I am very sure my day is coming And when it does you'll be the first to know.

Last edited by Kris93/95Z28; Oct 6, 2003 at 06:34 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 AM.