Cobalt SS
Re: Cobalt SS
nice kill... there are a lot of fast 3800's where i live... guess having www.zzperformance.com based in grand rapids really helps...
Re: Cobalt SS
Your Friends w/ a cold air ran a 14.5...and like ive said ive seen stock srt's hit 13.9's in good weather...Its atleast a good 1/2 second faster..which is 5 plus cars...id say thats a asswhoopin but thats jmo.
Re: Cobalt SS
ET-wise a Cobalt and SRT-4 are close. BUT, on the freeway, it's not a contest. Also, SRT-4s are underrated. They make their rated power at the wheels, not the crank. Go look up 0-100 times for the Cobalt and the SRT-4 to see the diff.
Also, you ever see a stock Cobalt run 103mph traps? That's borderline stock A4 2.73 ls1 speed:
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=2
Also, you ever see a stock Cobalt run 103mph traps? That's borderline stock A4 2.73 ls1 speed:
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=2
Re: Cobalt SS
I dont think we disagree at all. Like I said.. SRT4's are noticeably quicker.
Originally Posted by Antz97ZNJ
Your Friends w/ a cold air ran a 14.5...and like ive said ive seen stock srt's hit 13.9's in good weather...Its atleast a good 1/2 second faster..which is 5 plus cars...id say thats a asswhoopin but thats jmo.
Re: Cobalt SS
Originally Posted by nj87ttype
Time to chalk up #2 on the board. Beat another Cobalt SS in Philly the other night. I put about 2-3 car lengths on him in the beginning & it stayed that way the whole time. I think I've finally found my sweet spot with launching the Buick. I asked him to go again & he turned it down. Can't wait to buy a pulley & some other stuff. 

Re: Cobalt SS
Originally Posted by butterbar
So enough with the "SRT-4 is faster
" crap and lets get back to the original topic, shall we?
Jared
" crap and lets get back to the original topic, shall we?
Jared
J/K
Getting off topic is not only a tradition around here but it's darn good fun too
If you look at srtforums.com they have the fastest stock SRT-4 going 13.6 @ 102. Of course that happens about as often as a stock LS1 going 12.8 @ 107. Well driven SRT-4's are low 14's and the Colbolt SS are mid to upper 14's from what I have heard. All in all the SRT-4 is a little faster.
But under the right conditions you could see a 13.7 SRT-4 run a 14.7 Colbolt SS. One second difference is a decent butt kicking IMO. But on the other hand you could see a 14.4 SRT-4 face a 14.5 Colbolt SS where the winner was determined by the R/T.
But it still just a neon so the Colbolt will get the default win by not looking quite as gay as the SRT-4
I'm just kidding. A wins a win.
Re: Cobalt SS
I think Cobalt SS is better than SRT-4. From the factory they come with forged internals and have some serious mod potential. You can make a lot more HP with mods before you have to replace the engine internals and spend big $$.
Re: Cobalt SS
Originally Posted by Shred
I think Cobalt SS is better than SRT-4. From the factory they come with forged internals and have some serious mod potential. You can make a lot more HP with mods before you have to replace the engine internals and spend big $$.
You need to read alittle more. The LSJ internals are good up to about 350 horsepower. You'll never even get to 350 horsepower with that stock maxed eaton anyway.
Re: Cobalt SS
Originally Posted by UtOhCop
You need to read alittle more. The LSJ internals are good up to about 350 horsepower. You'll never even get to 350 horsepower with that stock maxed eaton anyway.
*EDIT*
I found it at www.cobaltss.com somewhere.
It talks about the stage 1 and 2 on the main page.
Last edited by hsyr; Dec 8, 2005 at 06:38 PM.
Re: Cobalt SS
Originally Posted by Shred
I think Cobalt SS is better than SRT-4. From the factory they come with forged internals and have some serious mod potential. You can make a lot more HP with mods before you have to replace the engine internals and spend big $$.
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/pr...0scc_projneon/
What we found is a ridiculously strong-looking engine that should survive many a quarter mile...Where typical engine development teams would spend time whittling away pennies finding the least expensive design that could meet durability targets, the turbo 2.4 team just threw in stronger parts and more expensive materials, cost be damned.
The SRT-4 drag teams are rumored to be making between 800 and 1200 hp on the stock crank (and stock block and bedplate), so we figure it's strong enough.
This chick went 110mph with bolt-ons! (Hers is an 03. The 04's and 05's have bigger injectors. Now she has a big turbo):
http://www.srtgurl.com/my_SRT-4.htm
(Scroll down towards the bottom of the page, they show the stock dyno #'s and what the mods did for the car before they went big turbo - keep in mind this is a ~2900 lb car too).
Re: Cobalt SS
Originally Posted by butterbar
So enough with the "SRT-4 is faster
" crap and lets get back to the original topic, shall we?
Nice kill, I didnt think a Buick could be real quick... do you have any time slips?
Jared
" crap and lets get back to the original topic, shall we?
Nice kill, I didnt think a Buick could be real quick... do you have any time slips?
Jared
Re: Cobalt SS
Originally Posted by Antz97ZNJ
Simply because its faster...Cobalt runs mid 14's, srt-4 is good for a 13.9 w/ a good driver


