Camaro vs. WRX
Re: Camaro vs. WRX
I've never lost to one yet, stock to lightly modded. They have a great launch if the guy can drive. They don't have enough power to keep them ahead of me much less and LS1 once all cars are rolling. Heavily modded ones with an aftermarket turbo, intercooler, etc. are likely to be very fast.
Re: Camaro vs. WRX
WRx's arent bad, go on there site they beat up on mustang GT's all day long
...generally the big car mags ran them to 14.2-14.4 area @ 95-96 ish...Ive seen a number of em easily hit 13's @ raceway park, not sure what they had or if they had anything at all but they look and sounded stock.
...generally the big car mags ran them to 14.2-14.4 area @ 95-96 ish...Ive seen a number of em easily hit 13's @ raceway park, not sure what they had or if they had anything at all but they look and sounded stock.
Re: Camaro vs. WRX
My best friend has a WRX with full exhuast, intake, and a MBC. He and i run all the time even from a stop he can't hang with me one he hits 3rd. Those cars really have no top end at all. I also ran him one time when i was driving my friends EVO (catback, MBC) and the EVO was beating up on him real bad from a 3rd gear roll. Even with the full vs Cat back exhuast the EVO out spooled the WRX. WOW i kinda got off topic there but the only way the WRX is gonna be a good run for a camaro (my case a firebird) is if it is at least some what modded and it is from a stop. Or an STi of course.
Re: Camaro vs. WRX
I'll need some more mods before I run one then.. Looks like anyones race, wanna make sure I win.. Friend wants me to run his girlfriends new STi. After Longtubes, tires and a tune, I think I should be in good shape.
Last edited by rokudan; Jan 6, 2005 at 04:46 PM.
Re: Camaro vs. WRX
Originally Posted by Steve Y
I've never lost to one yet, stock to lightly modded.
Re: Camaro vs. WRX
Originally Posted by audiopro
I'll need some more mods before I run one then.. Looks like anyones race, wanna make sure I win.. Friend wants me to run his girlfriends new STi. After Longtubes, tires and a tune, I think I should be in good shape.
Re: Camaro vs. WRX
Only place I will race is at a track, so it would be from a dig. I know the AWD is gonna make beating it out of the hole difficult.
Thanks for the input and the time estimates though, they at least give me a general idea of where things are at...
Thanks for the input and the time estimates though, they at least give me a general idea of where things are at...
Re: Camaro vs. WRX
Originally Posted by Antz97ZNJ
12.9's-13.4's @ 104-105
Stock WRX's don't feel very fast. My buddy has one. It has a decent amount done to it(Cobb Stage 2 tuning, uppipe, turboback exhaust, some intercooler hose and intake elbow) and it feels like it now might pull like my LT1 did stock. I would bet he's trapping around 98-99 mph now. The thing with AWD cars is that they can either be mediocre if the driver doesn't want to rag on the clutch, or quick with a great launch. A great launch means beating on the clutch though. WRX's can go mid to low 14's @ 96 mph stock.
WRX's and STi's are nice cars, but they are for a different kind of driver than your typical F-body owner.
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; Jan 7, 2005 at 08:27 AM.
Re: Camaro vs. WRX
Keep in mind, even a crappy driver can make those things slow. There was an STi at the track last fall, and he would spin off the line, then bog, and ended up never running better than 14.3@99mph.
Re: Camaro vs. WRX
Just be very conservative off the line. If the WRX owner knows how to drive and has enough huevos, he'll be so far in front after the first 60' that you might just panic and blow the rear tires out. I haven't run one, but I've seen them beat much quicker cars for that very reason. If you don't have them already, get some DRs and practice the launch.


