brink vs 2000 civic
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
Originally Posted by brink
more like it takes a built engine, nitrous, boost, 5 turbos, dual superchargers, 100" exhaust, and a body kit, and huge wing, and underglow to keep up with a LT1 / LS1.
Not quite, I've used my Talon to beat quite a few Mustangs and Camaros on and off the track. True a turbo only car with amateur mods will not take a LT1/LS1 but if you know what you're doing you can make a 4-banger sing.
Originally Posted by myslowcamaro
once again, the moral of the story is who has the most amount of money to sink into their car to win.

Take my word for it, I love my LT1 to death but when it comes to a turbo'd ricer I make sure to do my homework before laying down the smack talk
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
Originally Posted by brink
I kept up with a stock S2000 in my 3.8. *wink 

One of the wine and cheese rags got a 13.8 at 100 out of one bone stock.
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
Originally Posted by Copernicus325
but if you know what you're doing you can make a 4-banger sing.
And I am pretty darned sure that an LS1 Camaro would out-handle the **** out of a talon (lol).
No offense to you on this post
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
Originally Posted by 85_305
I hate how people say this (no offense). But HONESTLY.. you can make ANYTHING sing. What you can do to your 4 banger, can be done to an 8-cylander 100x better. What can be done to an 8-cylander, can be done to a 10-cylander only 100x better, and so on. Hell.. if I wanted to I could turn my my friends 1948 Case DC tractor whoop some ***. Any point in it? Nope.. none at all.
And I am pretty darned sure that an LS1 Camaro would out-handle the **** out of a talon (lol).
No offense to you on this post
And I am pretty darned sure that an LS1 Camaro would out-handle the **** out of a talon (lol).
No offense to you on this post

An LS1 and a Talon handle about the same.
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
I know it has 2x the potential steve, lol. I was just trying to get my point across. But I do NOT believe that talons handle as good as LS1's. I have NEVER heard of a talon, or any eagle for that matter, that handles good.
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
Originally Posted by 85_305
But I do NOT believe that talons handle as good as LS1's. I have NEVER heard of a talon, or any eagle for that matter, that handles good.
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
Originally Posted by 85_305
Well.. anything?
This is all from Motor Trend magazine from the last 15 or so years. I have 5 Talons (some are the mechanically identical Lasers and Eclipses) and 5 LS1 F-bodys. All cars are stock. Talon skidpads: .83, .87, .85, .87, .87. Talon slaloms: 66.2, 66.6, 67.5, 69.2, 69.0. Average Talon skidpad and slalom, .858 and 67.7. LS1 skidpads: .83, .83, .85, .84. LS1 slaloms: 63.0, 65.9, 64.9, 64.6, 64.6. Average LS1 skidpad and slalom, .8375 and 64.6. Sorry the Talon outhandles the LS1 in both catagories.
I'm not happy about it either. The reason is probably because of less curb weight.
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
Originally Posted by 85_305
Hm.. that is really surprising and really odd :/
But and LS1 skidpads less than a 1LE IROC, acheiving a .93?? How is taht one played out?
But and LS1 skidpads less than a 1LE IROC, acheiving a .93?? How is taht one played out?
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
Originally Posted by 85_305
But and LS1 skidpads less than a 1LE IROC, acheiving a .93?? How is taht one played out?
3rd gens: '88 IROC 350, .89g, 59.6mph, '90 IROC 350, .90, 64.2, '91 Formy 305, .87, 64.0, '88 GTA 350, .87, no speed given, '91 t/a vert 305, .92 65.1.
4th gens: '93 Z28, .86, 66.1, '94 Z28, .88, 68.3, '95 Z28, .84, 64.3, '93 Z28 .86, 66.1, '95 Z28, .88, 68.3, '96 Z28, .87, 65.7, '94 Z28 vert., .84, 62.6.
There are more, but you get the general idea. You can average them yourself if you want.
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
Here are some examples of great handling cars: '93 RX7, .97, 68.0, '92 3000GT VR4, .92, 70.5, '90 300ZX TT, .95, 71.9
, '95 Toyota MR2 T, .94, 69.2, '95 RX7, .98, 69.8, '94 Acura NSX, .95, 70.6, '91 Calloway TT Vette, .94, 71.3, '92 Shelby Cobra 427 S/C, 1.02
, 69.3.
, '95 Toyota MR2 T, .94, 69.2, '95 RX7, .98, 69.8, '94 Acura NSX, .95, 70.6, '91 Calloway TT Vette, .94, 71.3, '92 Shelby Cobra 427 S/C, 1.02
, 69.3.
Re: brink vs 2000 civic
*whistles* Wow.. those are some amazing numbers^
But why do 3rd gens pull more g's than 4th gens??
What is yours and everybody else's input on an '87 RX7 Turbo? I am going to race one this summer.. any suggestions?
But why do 3rd gens pull more g's than 4th gens??
What is yours and everybody else's input on an '87 RX7 Turbo? I am going to race one this summer.. any suggestions?


