auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by jaredwayt
well said Adam E....
as far as beating ls1's goes, im not bragging or anything but i have raced several auto 98-99 ls1's and have beaten them God's honest truth, i also have raced an 02 ws6 m6, and he pulled me pretty good, im not saying anything bad about ls1's they are very strong motors, and the majority of them are faster.as far as trapping 105, its very possible, ive seen it done several times, im going to post up a 96 ss trap 106.?0 from MT tonight.thanks.
as far as beating ls1's goes, im not bragging or anything but i have raced several auto 98-99 ls1's and have beaten them God's honest truth, i also have raced an 02 ws6 m6, and he pulled me pretty good, im not saying anything bad about ls1's they are very strong motors, and the majority of them are faster.as far as trapping 105, its very possible, ive seen it done several times, im going to post up a 96 ss trap 106.?0 from MT tonight.thanks.
You are such a liar.
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showth...4&page=8&pp=20
That was a 9 page thread of your lies over at ls1tech.com and now apparently you have come to z28.com to try again. Now in that post you were saying that your car COULD run low 13's but had no timeslip nor did you have a number in your sig over there. You were asked repeatedly to provide a slip and did not/could not. That was on the 03-12-05 which was six days ago. So in the last six days you managed to get to a track, run a 13.3 @ 105 with a "stone stock" LT1 SS?
I don't think so. Homey don't buy dat! You lied there and your doing it again here. According to you, your car puts down 275 RWHP (but you have no dyno graph to prove it) and you can run 13.3 @ 105. But to run a 105 trap in a full weight LT1 would take at least 290-300 rwhp unless you were at a sea level track in 40 degree weather and had a nice tail wind pushing you
Lies I tell you, all LIES!
But have a nice day
Last edited by darrens99formul; Mar 18, 2005 at 03:51 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by Antz97ZNJ
What I say doesnt mean ****, it just sounded like you made a cam'd LS1 hitting 11's something spectacular...some do it w/ just bolt ons...just pointing out that theres plenty of cam only LT1's running 11's also...Theres many of us here that have owned several LT1's and spent several weekends at the track like you...Eastern section moderater Brians96z has a cam only cc305 a4 car in the 11's...w/ no tune no less.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by Steve Y
And that LT1 weighed 3500 lbs. 
Car and Driver got a stock '99 6M LS1 to do a 13.8 at 104 and an '01 auto LS1 to do a 13.8 at 104. So the LT1 has 30 more hp than an LS1? No way. The LS1s usually weigh about 3400 lbs.
Car and Driver got a stock '99 6M LS1 to do a 13.8 at 104 and an '01 auto LS1 to do a 13.8 at 104. So the LT1 has 30 more hp than an LS1? No way. The LS1s usually weigh about 3400 lbs.
They also got a 99M6 TA to run a 13.3 At least Your getting my point.
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by 96SFLZ
Did nobody actually read it?
The 13.6@106 was done at the Chrysler proving grounds...which I doubt is an actual track.
At Milan the SS ran a best of 13.85@101.5.
106 in a bone stock LT1 F-body would be very, very hard to believe. Actually, I wouldn't believe it.
The 13.6@106 was done at the Chrysler proving grounds...which I doubt is an actual track.
At Milan the SS ran a best of 13.85@101.5.
106 in a bone stock LT1 F-body would be very, very hard to believe. Actually, I wouldn't believe it.
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by darrens99formul
You are such a liar.
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showth...4&page=8&pp=20
That was a 9 page thread of your lies over at ls1tech.com and now apparently you have come to z28.com to try again. Now in that post you were saying that your car COULD run low 13's but had no timeslip nor did you have a number in your sig over there. You were asked repeatedly to provide a slip and did not/could not. That was on the 03-12-05 which was six days ago. So in the last six days you managed to get to a track, run a 13.3 @ 105 with a "stone stock" LT1 SS?
I don't think so. Homey don't buy dat! You lied there and your doing it again here. According to you, your car puts down 275 RWHP (but you have no dyno graph to prove it) and you can run 13.3 @ 105. But to run a 105 trap in a full weight LT1 would take at least 290-300 rwhp unless you were at a sea level track in 40 degree weather and had a nice tail wind pushing you
Lies I tell you, all LIES!
But have a nice day
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showth...4&page=8&pp=20
That was a 9 page thread of your lies over at ls1tech.com and now apparently you have come to z28.com to try again. Now in that post you were saying that your car COULD run low 13's but had no timeslip nor did you have a number in your sig over there. You were asked repeatedly to provide a slip and did not/could not. That was on the 03-12-05 which was six days ago. So in the last six days you managed to get to a track, run a 13.3 @ 105 with a "stone stock" LT1 SS?
I don't think so. Homey don't buy dat! You lied there and your doing it again here. According to you, your car puts down 275 RWHP (but you have no dyno graph to prove it) and you can run 13.3 @ 105. But to run a 105 trap in a full weight LT1 would take at least 290-300 rwhp unless you were at a sea level track in 40 degree weather and had a nice tail wind pushing you
Lies I tell you, all LIES!
But have a nice day
Great work Darren!
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by robb4964
They also got a 99M6 TA to run a 13.3 At least Your getting my point.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by Steve Y
They got an SS to run a 13.5 at 107. What issue did they run the 13.3? Link?
My 99 TA time is something I read long before I bought my LS1. I'd have to dig it up.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
darrens99formul -sorry that my stock car trapped what your bolt-on ls1 did, sorry about that man, but no need to get upset.fwiw-it WAS ran in florida, and it was about 50*, on nitto's, nor once did i say it was full-weight, it dont have a huge weight reduction, but i took a couple lbs. off the car.my apoligizes once again.
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by jaredwayt
darrens99formul -sorry that my stock car trapped what your bolt-on ls1 did, sorry about that man, but no need to get upset.fwiw-it WAS ran in florida, and it was about 50*, on nitto's, nor once did i say it was full-weight, it dont have a huge weight reduction, but i took a couple lbs. off the car.my apoligizes once again.
The track is probably downhill with a tailwind. That would explain the 105 trap.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by Steve Y
Nittos come on factory cars? Weight reduction is from the factory? Stock my a**. And people say how Mustangers always say they are stock when they aren't. The track is probably downhill with a tailwind. That would explain the 105 trap.
The track is probably downhill with a tailwind. That would explain the 105 trap.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 681
From: Republic of Korea
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by robb4964
Did see a link the other day from a road test for a 99 formula from popular mechanics that ran a 13.1@107. Maybe I can find that one.
This one?
13.1@108
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by 96SFLZ
Thats nearly identical times to what My loaded 99 TA ran...Of course my sixties where pathetic. I know I could have easily ran 12's if I would have perfected my launch.
Thanks For the link BTW
Last edited by robb4964; Mar 20, 2005 at 10:52 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,148
From: AZ
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by jaredwayt
darrens99formul -sorry that my stock car trapped what your bolt-on ls1 did, sorry about that man, but no need to get upset.fwiw-it WAS ran in florida, and it was about 50*, on nitto's, nor once did i say it was full-weight, it dont have a huge weight reduction, but i took a couple lbs. off the car.my apoligizes once again.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 989
From: Rochester, NY
Re: auto ls1 z28 vs my 94 z28
Originally Posted by jaredwayt
darrens99formul -sorry that my stock car trapped what your bolt-on ls1 did, sorry about that man, but no need to get upset.fwiw-it WAS ran in florida, and it was about 50*, on nitto's, nor once did i say it was full-weight, it dont have a huge weight reduction, but i took a couple lbs. off the car.my apoligizes once again.
Last edited by darrens99formul; Mar 21, 2005 at 08:26 AM.