2000 Z28 VS Modded 2005 Mustang GT
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,876
From: Maryland
Re: 2000 Z28 VS Modded 2005 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by myslowcamaro
thats why i was saying ls1 and not camaro for the ws6 package. although i thought the rpo code for the "SS" was ws6 also?
the later comments were not ment to start any chevy/ford war but my opinion on how its apples to apples if you only compare the gt to ls1. once you change any factor in that, its apples to oranges. anyone here can probably run on about it..."cobra has a s/c, ok well 20 years ago the grand national...blah blah blah," sorry was just thinking outloud. nothing else ment. figured id clear that up so you dont think im a total a$$hole.
i know they time your 60', 1/8, and 1/4 at most tracks but do you guys have tracks that are limited to 1/8 mile?
the later comments were not ment to start any chevy/ford war but my opinion on how its apples to apples if you only compare the gt to ls1. once you change any factor in that, its apples to oranges. anyone here can probably run on about it..."cobra has a s/c, ok well 20 years ago the grand national...blah blah blah," sorry was just thinking outloud. nothing else ment. figured id clear that up so you dont think im a total a$$hole.
i know they time your 60', 1/8, and 1/4 at most tracks but do you guys have tracks that are limited to 1/8 mile?
No problem, i dont think your an a$$hole by any means.
I am not too gooed on 1/8 mile comparisons, i know there are websites that have conversions to what aprox you would run in the 1/4. I am not sure what the RPO code for SS was i dont think it is ws6, but somebody else can chime in about that.
Re: 2000 Z28 VS Modded 2005 Mustang GT
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
From: Bentonville, AR
Re: 2000 Z28 VS Modded 2005 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by MarcR94v6
Good kill!
You 2 match in stock HP ratings. And he did pay A LOT more $$ in mods and for his car. I always thought that Mustangs modded well?? But what's funny is that it's taken mustang 5 years to match us
You 2 match in stock HP ratings. And he did pay A LOT more $$ in mods and for his car. I always thought that Mustangs modded well?? But what's funny is that it's taken mustang 5 years to match us
Registered User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,025
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Re: 2000 Z28 VS Modded 2005 Mustang GT
Originally Posted by scott9050
It just shows that with a few small mods though the new base model V-8 can hang with an LS-1.
Just messin with you 
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 84
From: So Cal
Re: 2000 Z28 VS Modded 2005 Mustang GT
Hey Angus whats in your Mach1. and I'm sorry everybody I got the acual $ from my friend and at first he said over $2000 for the mods but now he says the following.
Magnaflow - $500
Tune- $500
Lowering(not much to do with performance)- $250
Intake - $500
Thats with labor on everything so he spent a total of $1750.
Also there was a stock mustang that was beating both of us with an 8.5 and he later admited to a 60 shot of n20! I knew it!
Magnaflow - $500
Tune- $500
Lowering(not much to do with performance)- $250
Intake - $500
Thats with labor on everything so he spent a total of $1750.
Also there was a stock mustang that was beating both of us with an 8.5 and he later admited to a 60 shot of n20! I knew it!
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,960
From: San Diego, CA
Re: 2000 Z28 VS Modded 2005 Mustang GT
Oh really? Then how is it that your car (03 mach 1) runs about 14 sec. in the 1/4 mile, when a 98 Camaro Z28, 4 years older, runs high 13s? The Camaro didn't just stop in 1998, it got a little better until 02, while the stang was still trailing behind, along with many others. And although it may not seem so, I am not a Mustang hater, I like to get into the rivalry and all but I don't hate. Just the facts, jack. It didn't happen 3 years ago from now. And it didn't happen 3 years ago from the demise of the Camaro.
I see the track times in your sig. Nice goin
. But you're not stock. My comment was made about stock vs. stock.
I see the track times in your sig. Nice goin
. But you're not stock. My comment was made about stock vs. stock.
Last edited by MarcR94v6; Jun 13, 2005 at 09:47 PM.