Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 03:37 PM
  #1  
poxz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 84
From: So Cal
2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Hey let me know if this makes sense. My buddy just picked up an 05 gt. And I just finished my first mods... SLP lid and free mods. his GT is bone stock.

So we both decide to go dyno at shop in corona, CA. Now the mustang GT is RATED at 300HP and 320TQ. And My Z28 is rated at 305/320.
I dynoed my car when I first got it and w/ mobile 1 and 100Octain it dynoed at 298/310.

Now I shouldn't see a big differance with the lid because not alot of air is flowing from the small fan they have at the dyno shop.

OK so he dynos first and his 05 mustang GT was 267/289!
I dynoed at 301/317.

Now i heard some GTs run mid 13s in the quarter. how is that with only 267/289 to the wheels??

My car ran about a 13.8?

What are your thoughts????????????
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #2  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Do u have 273's or 323's. If 323's your car should be running atleast lower 13's....those are just about right numbers for the manual 05 GTs....You'll still pull him fairly easy uptop. fastest 05 ive seen so far has been a 13.3 and a 13.1 w/ a reflash I believe

Last edited by Antz97ZNJ; Feb 14, 2005 at 04:04 PM.
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 08:50 PM
  #3  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Originally Posted by poxz
Hey let me know if this makes sense. My buddy just picked up an 05 gt. And I just finished my first mods... SLP lid and free mods. his GT is bone stock.

So we both decide to go dyno at shop in corona, CA. Now the mustang GT is RATED at 300HP and 320TQ. And My Z28 is rated at 305/320.
I dynoed my car when I first got it and w/ mobile 1 and 100Octain it dynoed at 298/310.

Now I shouldn't see a big differance with the lid because not alot of air is flowing from the small fan they have at the dyno shop.

OK so he dynos first and his 05 mustang GT was 267/289!
I dynoed at 301/317.

Now i heard some GTs run mid 13s in the quarter. how is that with only 267/289 to the wheels??

My car ran about a 13.8?

What are your thoughts????????????

Nice #s on your LS1! The highest bone stock '05 GT i've seen made 280 rwhp. Was the Stang a 5-speed? You probably had poor traction when you ran the 13.8. What was your trap speed? That is an indicator of hp.
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 11:21 PM
  #4  
Snorman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 253
From: New Jersey
Thumbs up Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Simple.
The '05 Mustang GT is underrated by about 20hp, and the LS1 is underrated (in F-bodies) by about 50hp.
With 298rwhp the F-body should run ~105-109mph variables depending. The GT will run around 101-104mph (and faster with a flash tune to defeat the drive-by-wire gremlins).
The GT's seem to get down the track efficiently...which to me is more of a point than trap speed.
S.
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 12:30 AM
  #5  
mattybz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 408
From: Charleston, SC
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Originally Posted by Steve Y
Was the Stang a 5-speed?
You drive a mustang and don't know that both auto's and manuals are 5 speed.
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 09:58 AM
  #6  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Originally Posted by mattybz28
You drive a mustang and don't know that both auto's and manuals are 5 speed.
Yes, I know that. You are probably too young to know the old timers language on sticks vs. automatics. When somebody says 3-speed, 4-speed, 5-speed, 6-speed, etc. they mean a stick. You have to specify automatic if you mean it. Car ads are the same way.
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #7  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Originally Posted by mattybz28
You drive a mustang and don't know that both auto's and manuals are 5 speed.
You driven a few mustangs...and you post on cz28 to find out what ratio gears to put in your GT...lol, sorry we cant all know it all like you.
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 05:09 PM
  #8  
SFB767's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,486
From: FL
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Originally Posted by Snorman
With 298rwhp the F-body should run ~105-109mph variables depending.
That's a little too optimistic.

The dyno numbers in my sig. were with a lid and a muffler.

My car probably makes about 305/325 right now and the best MPH I've managed is the in my sig.
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 05:25 PM
  #9  
BirchMan98z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 969
From: St. Louis, MO
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

LOL I like the powerglide 2 speed.
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #10  
twozs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 140
From: hopewell jct(70 miles n of nyc)
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

yea, we used to call the powerglide the screech bang tranny back in the day!
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:40 AM
  #11  
LT1WanaBe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 121
From: Fredericksburg/Harrisonburg, VA
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

The 6 speeds I believe are a 12% drivetrain loss and the 4L60-E's I can't remember, but I thought were 18%... ok I'm done with the useless information... to be perfectly honest, I was just trying to reach my 700th post

~Jon
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:54 AM
  #12  
BlkLT1Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 484
From: Orlando FL
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Originally Posted by SFB767
That's a little too optimistic.

The dyno numbers in my sig. were with a lid and a muffler.

My car probably makes about 305/325 right now and the best MPH I've managed is the in my sig.

My good friend ran a 12.85@110 with a lid, HTPP, FRA, ORYP, Cutout.

98 Z28 m6 fully loaded except leather, 59k miles.

It sounds about right to me, that 300rqhp can get you in the 108mph, if you can shift(m6 car)
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 10:31 AM
  #13  
aboadnan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 57
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

BlkLT1Z28

please tell us about your other car


============================

Other car is a 84 Monte Carlo SS


454BB with a 100mm turbo

600hp n/a
1100rwhp 15~20 psi
===============
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #14  
Snorman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 253
From: New Jersey
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

Yeah...I'd like to hear more about that too.
Pics, specs?
There's a big difference between 15 and 20psi...why the range?
S.
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 03:58 PM
  #15  
yellavette's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 26
From: Irmo, S.C
Re: 2000 Z28 VS 2005 Mustang GT Dyno

You won't get to 700 posting in the kill section. I've been stuck at 1 post for 2 years cause I only post here.

Jason
Originally Posted by LT1WanaBe
The 6 speeds I believe are a 12% drivetrain loss and the 4L60-E's I can't remember, but I thought were 18%... ok I'm done with the useless information... to be perfectly honest, I was just trying to reach my 700th post

~Jon
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Deadbolt24
LS1 Based Engine Tech
1
Jan 19, 2015 01:29 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
Dec 15, 2014 03:09 PM
Hurin
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
4
Dec 13, 2014 07:38 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 3, 2014 12:30 PM
bsmith
Car Audio and Electronics
5
Aug 23, 2002 04:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 PM.