03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am
03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am
This is my buddies slow slow neon racing a dude from the local meet. Has an LT1 T/A, Rear mount (STS?) Turbo System, on about 4 or 5 lbs. Traps about 115+
My friends Neon, bolt ons, stock turbo, stock exhaust, little thing gets away and the videos will surprise you, especially from the dig
http://www.jlturbo.com/vids/race_9_23.wmv
My friends Neon, bolt ons, stock turbo, stock exhaust, little thing gets away and the videos will surprise you, especially from the dig
http://www.jlturbo.com/vids/race_9_23.wmv
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am
Shiftknob im sorry your freinds neon left his *** i would say either he has a slow *** lt1 that runs like **** or he needs a tune.... not ragging but i have raced a stage 2 turbo neon and walked him easy.
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am
Originally Posted by Zeueses 97 RamAir
Shiftknob im sorry your freinds neon left his *** i would say either he has a slow *** lt1 that runs like **** or he needs a tune.... not ragging but i have raced a stage 2 turbo neon and walked him easy.
same here... busted the guy 2 times... once last year (mopar stage I), and again this year (mopar stage II), got him even worse this year with the addition of a magnus intake, a pro-m mass air and tuning... guy was mad... "wait til next year" he said... "yeh, that's funny" i thought to myself, "next year i'll have a 4g64 and a HUGE garrot and not a mitsu turbo... then he'll really be pissed...", i responded "can't wait!!!" with a sheepish grin...
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am
I raced a 03 SRT-4 that ran consistent 13.1 ~ 13.2s in my 93 Z28 before I sold it. He had all the bolt ons DR, and cranked the stock turbo up as far as it would go. He jumped me at the first then I ran him down and only lost by 1 1/2 ~ 2 cars. All the 93 Z28 had was bolt ons (LTs, Cutout, CAI, UD Pulley, Chip, 3.73s) 130K on the LT1 with 100% stock internals and was N/A. They can be fast, but a Turbo LT1 should be able to handle a stock turbo SRT-4 especially from a roll.
This isn't meant to bash them, they are definantly pocket rockets and can be made to move.
This isn't meant to bash them, they are definantly pocket rockets and can be made to move.
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am
same here... busted the guy 2 times... once last year (mopar stage I), and again this year (mopar stage II), got him even worse this year with the addition of a magnus intake, a pro-m mass air and tuning... guy was mad... "wait til next year" he said... "yeh, that's funny" i thought to myself, "next year i'll have a 4g64 and a HUGE garrot and not a mitsu turbo... then he'll really be pissed...", i responded "can't wait!!!" with a sheepish grin...
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am
Originally Posted by Mindgame
You sure that f-bod is turboed?? 
If so.. what a waste.
I'd pull the engine out and start over.
-Mindgame

If so.. what a waste.
I'd pull the engine out and start over.
-Mindgame
But wait, all the STS "experts" said that was an awesome system! They couldn't possibly be wrong...just ask them!
Just think, $4000 STS system and you still get wasted by a mid 13 sport compact. If that isn't lame, I don't know what is.
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am
Originally Posted by shiftknob
Well for all you guys calling 13's....ha. My friends Neon doesn't go 13's...just a tad bit faster 

Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am
Originally Posted by omnivore
I hope you don't expect us to believe that your 14.2 second Talon ate a Stage II SRT4..unless it was your grandma driving the SRT4. I raced a bone stock SRT4 (2004) last SAturday at St Thomas Dragway, against a 120 lb girl who had never drag raced before. And she went a best of 13.7 @ 102.6 MPH, and went better than 14.1 all day long. I call BS on your claims.


