Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2004 | 06:20 PM
  #1  
shiftknob's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

This is my buddies slow slow neon racing a dude from the local meet. Has an LT1 T/A, Rear mount (STS?) Turbo System, on about 4 or 5 lbs. Traps about 115+

My friends Neon, bolt ons, stock turbo, stock exhaust, little thing gets away and the videos will surprise you, especially from the dig

http://www.jlturbo.com/vids/race_9_23.wmv
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 03:36 AM
  #2  
Zeueses 97 RamAir's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 639
From: Grand Prarie,T.X
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

Shiftknob im sorry your freinds neon left his *** i would say either he has a slow *** lt1 that runs like **** or he needs a tune.... not ragging but i have raced a stage 2 turbo neon and walked him easy.
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #3  
Patrick kelly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 2
From: dorr, michigan
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

Originally Posted by Zeueses 97 RamAir
Shiftknob im sorry your freinds neon left his *** i would say either he has a slow *** lt1 that runs like **** or he needs a tune.... not ragging but i have raced a stage 2 turbo neon and walked him easy.

same here... busted the guy 2 times... once last year (mopar stage I), and again this year (mopar stage II), got him even worse this year with the addition of a magnus intake, a pro-m mass air and tuning... guy was mad... "wait til next year" he said... "yeh, that's funny" i thought to myself, "next year i'll have a 4g64 and a HUGE garrot and not a mitsu turbo... then he'll really be pissed...", i responded "can't wait!!!" with a sheepish grin...
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 03:40 PM
  #4  
Kris93/95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
From: Bentonville, AR
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

I raced a 03 SRT-4 that ran consistent 13.1 ~ 13.2s in my 93 Z28 before I sold it. He had all the bolt ons DR, and cranked the stock turbo up as far as it would go. He jumped me at the first then I ran him down and only lost by 1 1/2 ~ 2 cars. All the 93 Z28 had was bolt ons (LTs, Cutout, CAI, UD Pulley, Chip, 3.73s) 130K on the LT1 with 100% stock internals and was N/A. They can be fast, but a Turbo LT1 should be able to handle a stock turbo SRT-4 especially from a roll.

This isn't meant to bash them, they are definantly pocket rockets and can be made to move.
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #5  
Mindgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,985
From: In a house by the bay
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

You sure that f-bod is turboed??

If so.. what a waste.

I'd pull the engine out and start over.

-Mindgame
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #6  
omnivore's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
From: brantford,ON,Canada
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

same here... busted the guy 2 times... once last year (mopar stage I), and again this year (mopar stage II), got him even worse this year with the addition of a magnus intake, a pro-m mass air and tuning... guy was mad... "wait til next year" he said... "yeh, that's funny" i thought to myself, "next year i'll have a 4g64 and a HUGE garrot and not a mitsu turbo... then he'll really be pissed...", i responded "can't wait!!!" with a sheepish grin...
I hope you don't expect us to believe that your 14.2 second Talon ate a Stage II SRT4..unless it was your grandma driving the SRT4. I raced a bone stock SRT4 (2004) last SAturday at St Thomas Dragway, against a 120 lb girl who had never drag raced before. And she went a best of 13.7 @ 102.6 MPH, and went better than 14.1 all day long. I call BS on your claims.
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #7  
HeavyChevySS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 511
From: Newark, DE
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

Man oh man. That F-body got owned ! Props to the little Dodge. But that turbo f-body should be in the 12's if it was done right, maybe 11s.

Old Sep 25, 2004 | 09:44 PM
  #8  
Sephiroth's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 28
From: the sea of cheese
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

Who is it that says LT1's walk 99+GT's again?
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 10:13 PM
  #9  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

That guy need to have that LT1 checked out
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 10:05 AM
  #10  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

Originally Posted by Mindgame
You sure that f-bod is turboed??

If so.. what a waste.

I'd pull the engine out and start over.

-Mindgame
Exactly!

But wait, all the STS "experts" said that was an awesome system! They couldn't possibly be wrong...just ask them!

Just think, $4000 STS system and you still get wasted by a mid 13 sport compact. If that isn't lame, I don't know what is.
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 10:43 AM
  #11  
shiftknob's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 0
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

Well for all you guys calling 13's....ha. My friends Neon doesn't go 13's...just a tad bit faster
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 11:34 AM
  #12  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

Originally Posted by shiftknob
Well for all you guys calling 13's....ha. My friends Neon doesn't go 13's...just a tad bit faster
The vast majority of SRT-4s go 13s. There are always exceptions to every rule.
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 12:28 PM
  #13  
nuke61's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 52
From: Vista, Ca
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

Sounds like a quick Neon. Nevertheless, I'd be SEVERELY pissed if I had a twin turbo'd LT1 that only trapped 115 mph.
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #14  
Mindgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,985
From: In a house by the bay
Red face Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

"Pissed"?

I'd drive the thing off a cliff to put it out of it's misery.

-Mindgame
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 03:03 PM
  #15  
Patrick kelly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 2
From: dorr, michigan
Re: 03 SRT vs. Turbo Lt1 Trans Am

Originally Posted by omnivore
I hope you don't expect us to believe that your 14.2 second Talon ate a Stage II SRT4..unless it was your grandma driving the SRT4. I raced a bone stock SRT4 (2004) last SAturday at St Thomas Dragway, against a 120 lb girl who had never drag raced before. And she went a best of 13.7 @ 102.6 MPH, and went better than 14.1 all day long. I call BS on your claims.
read my sig. ... the talon is gone (i also ran 16.0 @ 100mph with that (talon)car (1/2 throttle thru 1st gear then full on, i was 6 hours from home and drove the car, and saw 5 dsm's destroy trannys, and didn't feel like walkin)), the car was fast enough to run low 13's but pullin 2.4 60-ft times it just aint going to happen, any who my galant is MUCH faster)... the galant is the car that did the killin'... just fyi...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.