Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes Shocks, springs, cages, brakes, sub-frame connectors, etc.

Subframe Connectors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2010 | 04:21 PM
  #1  
Carrotop79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 54
From: Dothan, Alabama
Subframe Connectors

Hey all, I have been reading about the sfc being one of the best "bolt-on" mods to do and now am looking at a set of black UMI's. Before I make the order, I was wandering what else I might need for the suspension. I do not plan on turning this into a drag car/autocross or anything like that. Any suggestions other than sfc's for my 24K mile weekend car? Thanks all.
Old Sep 20, 2010 | 05:05 PM
  #2  
Procharged94Lt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 907
SFC's will be a huge difference in the way the car handles- you will notice a big reduction in dash movement and rattles as well.

There is always upgrading shocks/springs, urethane bushings and sway bars.

Good luck
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 07:01 AM
  #3  
redneckgames's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 325
From: Lincolnton, NC
tubular lcas really helped my car with wheel hop, Id definately throw a set of them under there
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 08:56 AM
  #4  
Wild Willy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 439
From: upstate New York
I have the UMI sfc's- good stuff! I also went with the adjustable torque arm that attached to the connector between the sfc's- It rubbed me the wrong way that the stock torque arm was dumping all the rear axle torque loads onto the tail of the transmission, which is mounted on rubber mounts. When running the car hard, I could see the shifter moving around as the loads changed, and it irked me- didn't seem to be the 'right way' of doing things. Recommend both- it lays down power now much more smoothly- never had a problem with wheel hop, don't know if that is the reason why.
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 04:43 PM
  #5  
mudbone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 676
From: Rixeyville, VA
Does anyone have experience with adding SFC to a convertible? My car shakes a lot -- especially when the top is down. Any first-hand experience? Mrs. Mudbone would like to know.
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 08:11 AM
  #6  
Carrotop79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 54
From: Dothan, Alabama
Okay a couple things: I have decided to go with the UMI SFC's even though they are $300! Also while I am ordering I thought I might just go ahead and get the LCA's. There are so many different varieties though. Adjustable with poly, non-adjustable with rubber, dual-roto joint etc. Is it a bad thing just to want the non-adjustable arms? It is a kit with the panhard rod also. (any thoughts on the PRod would be great). Also is an aftermarket tranny crossmember (other than the stock one) necessary?

So the million dollar question is: SFC's, LCA's, Panhard Rod and Crossmember or 1, 2, Panhard Rod and no crossmember?

Thanks all.
Old Sep 23, 2010 | 10:00 PM
  #7  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,098
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally Posted by mudbone
Does anyone have experience with adding SFC to a convertible? My car shakes a lot -- especially when the top is down. Any first-hand experience? Mrs. Mudbone would like to know.
Buddy of mine had a very high HP 30th SS convertible..... and he ran a set of fairly inexpensive MAC tubular SFC's that he installed right after he bought the car in 1997. Over the course of making various exhaust upgrades, he ditched the convertible's unique "X" sheet metal brace on the floor pans. Eventually, the SFC's were tied together with the front mount for a Madman torque arm. But, since the car eventually ran in the low 8's, it also had a very beefy roll cage, that probably did a lot more than the SFC's to strengthen the chassis.
Old Sep 24, 2010 | 05:07 PM
  #8  
mudbone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 676
From: Rixeyville, VA
Fred,

I have no plans to high HP mod my convertible -- Mrs. Mudbone would hang me. Do you think a set of standard SFCs for a 'vert would subdue our shaking?
Old Sep 25, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #9  
Procharged94Lt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 907
Any braces or tubing that you add to the car is prol going to help- and given how much the coupes shudder around I'm sure the 'verts can use all the help they can get.
Old Sep 25, 2010 | 12:54 PM
  #10  
JETMAN95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 340
From: Cols. OH
I'm installing Kook long tubes w/3" y-pipe on my '96 Z28 and wonder if I will have clearance issues with a set of UMI SFC's
Old Sep 26, 2010 | 10:56 AM
  #11  
pgerst's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 349
From: Westminster, CA
Mudbone -- the SFCs helped mine a little bit. I used the weld-in UMI convertible version. (I think the triangulated ones don't fit because of the x-brace; not sure having the stamped x-brace is better than no x-brace and triangulated sfcs?)
Old Sep 26, 2010 | 02:00 PM
  #12  
mudbone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 676
From: Rixeyville, VA
pgerst, Would your "little bit" be enough to recommend doing it, or just meh?
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 08:41 AM
  #13  
pgerst's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 349
From: Westminster, CA
Mudbone -- Yes, I would do it again. I added the sfc at the same time I did a shock tower brace (Edelbrock triangulated version) so I am not sure how much of the increased stiffness comes from the sfc versus stb but suspect the majority from the sfc. That being said, sfc/stb do as advertised and stiffen the chassis and will noticeably reduce rattle/flex as well as the cross-corner wobble that happens at higher speeds.

(My "little bit" is more of a bang for the buck ranking of suspension mods that I have done. I have read posts that say sfc are the most important suspension upgrade and my feeling is that I got more out of the ls1 brake upgrade, performance springs/shocks, watts link in terms of increased handling performance.)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff1904
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Jun 5, 2016 05:00 PM
football4life
Cars For Sale
2
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 AM
Double aught
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Oct 2, 2015 11:29 PM
autoxr166
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
Sep 25, 2015 04:21 PM
frankrizz
2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion
1
Sep 23, 2015 04:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.