Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes Shocks, springs, cages, brakes, sub-frame connectors, etc.

SFC 3 point connection worth extra $$$?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-25-2009, 04:55 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
alex-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 217
SFC 3 point connection worth extra $$$?

I got t-tops that's why I am thinking of getting 3 point connection. What do you guys think would it be worth for me to get them over 2 point.
alex-z28 is offline  
Old 12-25-2009, 08:38 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Wild Willy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: upstate New York
Posts: 439
Better triangulation, what weight is added is low, can be tied together either with a real piece of structural steel or even a driveshaft loop- I voted for this with my wallet-
Wild Willy is offline  
Old 12-25-2009, 08:56 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
ZDriver96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 1,490
I purchased tubular 2 pt SFC years ago for my T top camaro. I have no t-top leaks in the rain. My mom had a 94 camaro and the T tops started leaking after a couple of years. She did not have SFC. I've had them on my car since 2000 and it keeps the frame tight enough to prevent t top leaks.

But a 3 point support is without a doubt the strongest. Is it needed? I don't know. I've never ridden in a camaro with a 3 pt set up.

SFC's don't help your handling any but will keep the frame tight and parts from breaking/squeaking/leaking.
ZDriver96 is offline  
Old 12-26-2009, 01:02 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
alex-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 217
I wanted to get SFC for years but never got around to it. I read how great they are and what a big differance they make, I just know once I do get them I am gonna be mad at myself for not getting them sooner. My t-tops don't leak but I have tons of raddling/squeaking in the car, probably cause my z is a 93. I have finally decided to get them this spring.

Anyway, I am not sure which to get cause one guy told me because I have t-tops the body/frame is weaker and I should go for 3 point, but then other people said that 3 point are over kill unless you do autocross racing (which I don't) so don't spend extra money for something you don't really need.

Last edited by alex-z28; 12-26-2009 at 01:13 AM.
alex-z28 is offline  
Old 12-26-2009, 11:00 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Bowtie4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St. Cloud, FL
Posts: 282
I got the 3pt one because I like pushing the car through the turns. The car doesn't know if it's on the street being driven hard or on the track being driven hard, and also thought it's a good place for something else to tie everything in together.
Bowtie4life is offline  
Old 12-27-2009, 07:30 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carol Stream, Il.
Posts: 3,557
I have the 3-point and love them. Yeah there's some extra weight to them but the improved handling justified the few extra pounds IMO.
Z-RATED94 is offline  
Old 12-27-2009, 11:41 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
alex-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 217
OK I decided to get the 3 point connection SFC. Now which one should I get UMI or SLP they are both like same price. Does one fit better then the other?
alex-z28 is offline  
Old 12-28-2009, 08:29 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Wild Willy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: upstate New York
Posts: 439
They are both reputable companies, and I have parts from both. I have good help from UMI's customer service, so I can say that from experience. Haven't had to use SLP's service yet, it may be just as good- dunno

I will say that UMI has other related parts- the driveshaft loops, the torque arm kit that will tie into those SFC-s- I had to get the torque arm mount for modified exhaust to clear my SLP Y-pipe-
Wild Willy is offline  
Old 12-28-2009, 08:42 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
blue 79 Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Richmond B.C.
Posts: 2,002
i vote for the umi piece, excellent fit and its light!
blue 79 Z/28 is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 03:43 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
alex-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 217
Originally Posted by Wild *****
They are both reputable companies, and I have parts from both. I have good help from UMI's customer service, so I can say that from experience. Haven't had to use SLP's service yet, it may be just as good- dunno

I will say that UMI has other related parts- the driveshaft loops, the torque arm kit that will tie into those SFC-s- I had to get the torque arm mount for modified exhaust to clear my SLP Y-pipe-

I got driveshaft loop and the torque arm, I don't know how they would tie ito those SFCs. Got any pics?


Originally Posted by blue 79 Z/28
i vote for the umi piece, excellent fit and its light!

I think I am gonna go with UMI, and yeah they look lighter then SLP.
alex-z28 is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 09:21 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Wild Willy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: upstate New York
Posts: 439
The piece that the torque arm relocation kit mounts to is the same piece that the 3-point SFC's are connected by. Pic from UMI websote:

http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...roducts_id=197
Wild Willy is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 09:40 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Wild Willy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: upstate New York
Posts: 439
Holy double-post, Batman! Anybody else having problems with the site updating?
Wild Willy is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 10:04 AM
  #13  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,662
Read the "Announcements".....the site is being moved to a new server. Some service interuptions are to be expected.

https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/announcement.php?f=47
Injuneer is online now  
Old 12-29-2009, 10:07 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Wild Willy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: upstate New York
Posts: 439
Ah, gotcha- didn't realize you were doing it hot-swapping. Kudos- Knew it was coming, just wasn't paying attention to when-
Wild Willy is offline  
Old 12-30-2009, 05:38 AM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
alex-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 217
Originally Posted by Wild *****
The piece that the torque arm relocation kit mounts to is the same piece that the 3-point SFC's are connected by. Pic from UMI websote:

http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...roducts_id=197
My torque arm looks a lot different then the one in that picutre and I don't think I will able to tie it in with the SFCs. I should able to tie the driveshaft to it though.
alex-z28 is offline  


Quick Reply: SFC 3 point connection worth extra $$$?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.