LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

I Beam vs H beam rods for 383

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 04:07 PM
  #1  
Dtimekw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 311
From: Sunny South Florida
I Beam vs H beam rods for 383

I am in the middle of a 383 build from the ground up. My order got mixed up somehow and I ended up with an Eagle forged rotating assembly with forged rods instead of the H beams that I wanted. I am putting this in new 4 bolt LT1 block that has been bored .030. How much of a difference will this make in the long run? Realistically, I see the motor putting out around the 375-400rwhp mark. I want to build a strong bottom end that I could do a better H/C to in a few years if I wanted to, which by the way, does anyone know what the specs are for a stock cam in a 95Z w/ T-56 trans? Any help would be great. Thanks.
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 04:39 PM
  #2  
seawolf06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,034
From: Raleigh, NC
H-Beam Vs. I-Beam

Originally Posted by Hot Rod Magazine
For years the battle has raged on as to which is better, an I-beam or an H-beam. In pure tension and compression, they are both equally capable, assuming equal cross-sectional area. But when you add the fact that some components of the combustion event attempt to screw the piston down the cylinder, the greater distance from the centerline of the pin to the edge of the beam gives the H-beam an advantage in resisting such twisting forces. We’ve seen both designs used successfully in a wide variety of extreme applications, so the jury is still out. Perhaps the biggest advantage of the H-beam design is that it gives the manufacturer more flexibility when sculpting the rod into the most effective form from a strength-to-mass standpoint.
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/c...ds/index3.html

Stock cam specs:

http://www.grandsportregistry.com/lt1vslt4.htm

I really hope you're not putting stock H/C on a 383...
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 05:00 PM
  #3  
Dtimekw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 311
From: Sunny South Florida
thanks for the info and no, I am not putting stock heads back on. Just want to get an idea of how much more cam I will be going with. Thanks again.
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #4  
ABA383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,903
From: Littlestown, PA
I've almost got 12 years on my 383 built with Oliver 5.85" Billet steel I beams...I make 400rwhp and they've never let me down...

--Alan
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #5  
Dtimekw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 311
From: Sunny South Florida
Thanks for the vote of confidence Alan. If you don't mind my asking, what are your basic engine specs? I don't want all the secrets just a basic idea. Thanks again.

Troy
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 06:44 PM
  #6  
TransAm396's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,125
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by ABA383
I've almost got 12 years on my 383 built with Oliver 5.85" Billet steel I beams...I make 400rwhp and they've never let me down...

--Alan


Big difference between billet I beams and forged I beams.. Billet I beams are stronger than forged Hbeams.
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:44 AM
  #7  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
One thing to consider with the Eagle "I" beams is that they are made from 5140 steel. The H-beam Eagles are made from 4340 steel.

That being said I have the 5140 rods in my present shortblock, and they handle the power levels you are describing with ease.

I am building a new shortblock for my car (different pistons and forged crank) and am using the Scat pro mod rods that are an I beam design and made from 4340 steel.

Eagle rates their 5140 rods to 500 hp.
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 12:34 PM
  #8  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
The quality of the rod and the fasteners is much more important than H vs. I beam. Except in the most extreme applications, primary rod failures are quite rare anyway.

Rich
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 03:06 PM
  #9  
Dtimekw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 311
From: Sunny South Florida
Hey guys, thanks for the input. I really appreciate it. I want to build a pretty strong bottom end motor. I dont mind doing heads/cam later if I have to because I don't have to pull the motor for that.
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 03:12 PM
  #10  
DRCE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 43
I suppose it depends on what I-beams you are refering to.

Firstly in your post you say you wanted h-beams and got forged rods instead. The h-beams are forged 4340 material, its the i-beams that are sub-par material. This is within the Eagle line-up. What brand are we talking about. Carillo I-beams are some the nicest and strongest rods available, but they're also $1500 a set.
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 05:33 PM
  #11  
Dtimekw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 311
From: Sunny South Florida
The rods are made by Eagle, SIR 5.7". Will this make much of a difference? I guess the next obvious question would be are SIR rods any good and what does "bushed" mean when talking about pins? Sorry to keep hitting all these questions, I just don't want to do this bottom in a year or two.
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 08:20 PM
  #12  
ABA383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,903
From: Littlestown, PA
Originally Posted by Dtimekw
Thanks for the vote of confidence Alan. If you don't mind my asking, what are your basic engine specs? I don't want all the secrets just a basic idea. Thanks again.

Troy
I don't keep too many secrets as this is supposed to be fun..Anyway, the motor was originally an LPE 383 engine package built almost 12 years ago. The bottom end remains untouched as they built it with a Callies crank, Oliver billet 5.85" rods and JE pistons all in a Corvette 4 bolt block...11.2:1 comp ratio...Heads are LT1 castings with 2.00/1.56 valves originally CNC'd/hand done by LPE and re-ported by E.B. Porting in 2005 along with a Joe Overton spec'd 226/234 cam to replace the LPE 211/219 it came with...Intake was ported by LPE and its got an LPE 58mm TB...I never had any failures at all, I just wanted to go a bit faster which is why I had the heads re-ported and went with a bit bigger (yet still fairly weenie) cam...I only have to go to 6300 to make peak hp which is also easier on the rotating parts...

I realize the billet rods are stronger than the regular forged...Was just saying that these I beams are very durable and have proven themselves over time...

--Alan
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 08:49 PM
  #13  
Dtimekw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 311
From: Sunny South Florida
Alan, thanks for the baseline. I am not looking to go out and beat a bunch of ricers, just nice to know that I could if I wanted to. I am like you, I don't need to go fast, just faster than the guy next to me

Thanks again. I really appreciate the info.

Troy
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:03 PM
  #14  
ABA383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,903
From: Littlestown, PA
You're welcome..I'm actually going to try for 11 teens with this little cam next year...Going to 3" true duals with an X, Edelbrock 304's, dumped at the axle and switching the 3.73s to 4.10s...I think there's .2 there somewhere...

--Alan
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:07 PM
  #15  
Dtimekw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 311
From: Sunny South Florida
Good luck with it. Please let us know how you make out. Any time an F-body makes it big, I think we smile

Mind if I PM you a few specs in the coming days?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Devinfoote87
Parts For Sale
2
Feb 12, 2016 03:21 PM
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
Jan 29, 2016 05:56 PM
smoknta
Cars For Sale
1
Aug 27, 2015 05:07 PM
realistyc
Cars For Sale
4
Jul 28, 2015 07:32 PM
alphaauto
Cars For Sale
0
Jul 26, 2015 04:40 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 PM.