Post Dyno #'s here!!!!!!
See sig for nitrous numbers.
For N/A, I was having some issues on my runs and they were ****ing pathetic.
On my 2nd nitrous run, my NOS solenoid stuck open after I shut down and froze my intake well and good - that was the end of my day. Gunna have to replace or rebuild the noid before spraying again. My AFR for the nitrous runs was in the 10's so I should make more power once I lean out the fuel jet a bit. Also got a weird nitrous surge problem after it hits - maybe the solenoid's fault also.
Thanks for setting this up Matt! gunna have to go back again soon once I have my issues sorted out.
EDIT: the rwhp number in the sig was at 5500 rpm and the power was still climbing - hope to hit a solid 450 next time
For N/A, I was having some issues on my runs and they were ****ing pathetic.
On my 2nd nitrous run, my NOS solenoid stuck open after I shut down and froze my intake well and good - that was the end of my day. Gunna have to replace or rebuild the noid before spraying again. My AFR for the nitrous runs was in the 10's so I should make more power once I lean out the fuel jet a bit. Also got a weird nitrous surge problem after it hits - maybe the solenoid's fault also.
Thanks for setting this up Matt! gunna have to go back again soon once I have my issues sorted out.
EDIT: the rwhp number in the sig was at 5500 rpm and the power was still climbing - hope to hit a solid 450 next time
Last edited by Draco; Apr 24, 2004 at 09:58 PM.
281 rwhp
326 rwtq
On manifolds to boot
Can't find my corrected #s but I like these better anyways
Thanks Matt for talking me into dynoing and introducing my to this place. Very cool people there and close to my house too. I'm going back after the headers for another run.
326 rwtq
On manifolds to boot
Can't find my corrected #s but I like these better anyways
Thanks Matt for talking me into dynoing and introducing my to this place. Very cool people there and close to my house too. I'm going back after the headers for another run.
If anyone wants to know the corrected SAE numbers (to compare with other peeps' results elsewhere) - my correction factor was 0.96. SNK was only giving out STD non-corrected numbers unless you asked specifically.
So if you have 300 rwhp peak, multiply by 0.96 to get a corrected result of 288
So if you have 300 rwhp peak, multiply by 0.96 to get a corrected result of 288
Hey Craig , spill the beens on the cam ?? What psi did you spray your hit at ? Torque seems low for spray 
I wish I could have dynoed you bastards !!
EDIT : did you tap your run with the wide band ?

I wish I could have dynoed you bastards !!
EDIT : did you tap your run with the wide band ?
Last edited by Tw!tchb!tch; Apr 24, 2004 at 10:35 PM.
sprayed at full NX heater pressure (1050) with a full bottle.
cam is a Comp 228/228 XER lobe
I think I figured why my N/A runs were so low. With the hood closed, my IATs were hitting 150F - this caused the MAF to read low and the car to run lean (was seeing 14.5-15 AFR on both N/A runs).
When we opened to hood to do Nitrous runs, the problem went away.... Always dyno with your hood open to let that heat out since you arent actually moving at 100+ mph!
cam is a Comp 228/228 XER lobe
I think I figured why my N/A runs were so low. With the hood closed, my IATs were hitting 150F - this caused the MAF to read low and the car to run lean (was seeing 14.5-15 AFR on both N/A runs).
When we opened to hood to do Nitrous runs, the problem went away.... Always dyno with your hood open to let that heat out since you arent actually moving at 100+ mph!
I agree that I will be going to SNK for future stuff. Great hosts. Awesome burgers. Good prices.
I was puzzled at first though when they said they didn't need to use corrected numbers, but that's allright. As long as you know you aren't dealing with corrected numbers and have the CF to make the adjustment - or can have the #'s corrected on each run(in fact, if anyone wanted, I'm sure you can call them up and they can print you up a new screen with Corrected #'s - most shops will since they have the runs on file.)
Craig, what issues did you have NA?
Matt did a good job of arranging it.
I was puzzled at first though when they said they didn't need to use corrected numbers, but that's allright. As long as you know you aren't dealing with corrected numbers and have the CF to make the adjustment - or can have the #'s corrected on each run(in fact, if anyone wanted, I'm sure you can call them up and they can print you up a new screen with Corrected #'s - most shops will since they have the runs on file.)
Craig, what issues did you have NA?
Matt did a good job of arranging it.
Thanx Chris, yeah I knew about corrected numbers, but thats for the arizona guys who don't like their 350rwhp & want to see higher numbers
thats only good to compare numbers with guys from other places, my corrected at .96 is 397RWHP & 365RWTQ, uncorrected was nicer
413.2rwhp & 380rwtq, the uncorrected numbers are the ones you use if you want to know how fast the car is & what it should run at the track.
Guys in other places post their corrected numbers being 400rwhp but uncorrected was 360 living in the desert
then they run high 13's at low MPH & wonder why. LOL
thats only good to compare numbers with guys from other places, my corrected at .96 is 397RWHP & 365RWTQ, uncorrected was nicer
413.2rwhp & 380rwtq, the uncorrected numbers are the ones you use if you want to know how fast the car is & what it should run at the track.Guys in other places post their corrected numbers being 400rwhp but uncorrected was 360 living in the desert
then they run high 13's at low MPH & wonder why. LOL



?
