Pacific Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington

Post Dyno #'s here!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
Muskys SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 888
From: Langley, BC,Canada
Post Dyno #'s here!!!!!!

I'm curious to see what everyone got??????
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #2  
sideways_Into_3rd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,842
From: BC, Canada
All I gotta say is .. NOS solenoids suck !!!
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 09:55 PM
  #3  
Draco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,213
From: North Vancouver, BC
See sig for nitrous numbers.

For N/A, I was having some issues on my runs and they were ****ing pathetic.

On my 2nd nitrous run, my NOS solenoid stuck open after I shut down and froze my intake well and good - that was the end of my day. Gunna have to replace or rebuild the noid before spraying again. My AFR for the nitrous runs was in the 10's so I should make more power once I lean out the fuel jet a bit. Also got a weird nitrous surge problem after it hits - maybe the solenoid's fault also.

Thanks for setting this up Matt! gunna have to go back again soon once I have my issues sorted out.

EDIT: the rwhp number in the sig was at 5500 rpm and the power was still climbing - hope to hit a solid 450 next time

Last edited by Draco; Apr 24, 2004 at 09:58 PM.
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:00 PM
  #4  
Zedzag's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 715
From: vancouver,b.c.
281 rwhp
326 rwtq

On manifolds to boot

Can't find my corrected #s but I like these better anyways

Thanks Matt for talking me into dynoing and introducing my to this place. Very cool people there and close to my house too. I'm going back after the headers for another run.
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:03 PM
  #5  
Draco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,213
From: North Vancouver, BC
If anyone wants to know the corrected SAE numbers (to compare with other peeps' results elsewhere) - my correction factor was 0.96. SNK was only giving out STD non-corrected numbers unless you asked specifically.

So if you have 300 rwhp peak, multiply by 0.96 to get a corrected result of 288
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:04 PM
  #6  
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
Corrected numbers off Steph untouched LT1 bolt on car at Carb Conn today.

286 RWHP and 358 RWTQ
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:11 PM
  #7  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Hey my correction factor was .95!!!

Uncorrected (actual) numbers are:
413.2RWHP & 380RWTQ

Correction factor was .96 that day

Last edited by bunker; Apr 24, 2004 at 10:16 PM.
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:13 PM
  #8  
Draco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,213
From: North Vancouver, BC
wow thats alot of TQ!!! didnt realize you hit the nitrous too
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:14 PM
  #9  
Zedzag's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 715
From: vancouver,b.c.
Thanks for the conversion Craig.

OneFlyn- what bolt-ons does Steph's car have?
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:24 PM
  #10  
sideways_Into_3rd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,842
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by OneFlyn95z28
untouched LT1 bolt on car
isnt that an oxymoron ?
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:32 PM
  #11  
Tw!tchb!tch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,696
From: British Columbia, Canada
Hey Craig , spill the beens on the cam ?? What psi did you spray your hit at ? Torque seems low for spray

I wish I could have dynoed you bastards !!

EDIT : did you tap your run with the wide band ?

Last edited by Tw!tchb!tch; Apr 24, 2004 at 10:35 PM.
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:35 PM
  #12  
Draco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,213
From: North Vancouver, BC
sprayed at full NX heater pressure (1050) with a full bottle.

cam is a Comp 228/228 XER lobe

I think I figured why my N/A runs were so low. With the hood closed, my IATs were hitting 150F - this caused the MAF to read low and the car to run lean (was seeing 14.5-15 AFR on both N/A runs).

When we opened to hood to do Nitrous runs, the problem went away.... Always dyno with your hood open to let that heat out since you arent actually moving at 100+ mph!
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:42 PM
  #13  
Tw!tchb!tch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,696
From: British Columbia, Canada
Would you be able to post or email me your dyno graph ? Id like to check out how your af's and everything look .

Thats a pretty big ****ing cam

What were your NA numbers ?
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #14  
Camaro ChriSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,711
From: Canadian West Coast
I agree that I will be going to SNK for future stuff. Great hosts. Awesome burgers. Good prices.

I was puzzled at first though when they said they didn't need to use corrected numbers, but that's allright. As long as you know you aren't dealing with corrected numbers and have the CF to make the adjustment - or can have the #'s corrected on each run(in fact, if anyone wanted, I'm sure you can call them up and they can print you up a new screen with Corrected #'s - most shops will since they have the runs on file.)

Craig, what issues did you have NA?

Matt did a good job of arranging it.
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 11:39 PM
  #15  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Thanx Chris, yeah I knew about corrected numbers, but thats for the arizona guys who don't like their 350rwhp & want to see higher numbers thats only good to compare numbers with guys from other places, my corrected at .96 is 397RWHP & 365RWTQ, uncorrected was nicer 413.2rwhp & 380rwtq, the uncorrected numbers are the ones you use if you want to know how fast the car is & what it should run at the track.

Guys in other places post their corrected numbers being 400rwhp but uncorrected was 360 living in the desert then they run high 13's at low MPH & wonder why. LOL



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.