Pacific Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington

Post Dyno #'s here!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 04:15 PM
  #31  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Originally posted by OneFlyn95z28

BTW Bunker people from other staes post Corrected numbers because you do not have the ***** to go dyno with them
BTW My corrected numbers are:

397RWHP
365RWTQ

Highest I've ever seen locally buddy.
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 04:22 PM
  #32  
NiteRider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,201
From: Montreal, Canada
Originally posted by OneFlyn95z28
LOL Corrected numbers are the number you want to look at. THAT is what will tell you how your car will compare to others.

MY UN Corrected numbers for the blue car hurt peoples feelings. 411hp and 436tq

I actually posted Stephs Corrected numbers wrong. they are actually 280.10hp and 382.27tq. Smog legal through the cat!

This car has nothing but a CAI, headers and a Cat back for power. 119,000 miles(192,000Km) on the car. Engine was changed by GM some time before 70,000(113,000Km) miles when we bought it. I have replaced the Opti, water pump and intake gaskets. other then that it is stock intake to oil pan, throttle body to flex plate

BTW Bunker people from other staes post Corrected numbers because you do not have the ***** to go dyno with them
Woo man, harsh words. How come your ***** weren't at the dyno?
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #33  
Draco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,213
From: North Vancouver, BC
Originally posted by OneFlyn95z28
LOL Corrected numbers are the number you want to look at. THAT is what will tell you how your car will compare to others.

MY UN Corrected numbers for the blue car hurt peoples feelings. 411hp and 436tq

I actually posted Stephs Corrected numbers wrong. they are actually 280.10hp and 382.27tq. Smog legal through the cat!

This car has nothing but a CAI, headers and a Cat back for power. 119,000 miles(192,000Km) on the car. Engine was changed by GM some time before 70,000(113,000Km) miles when we bought it. I have replaced the Opti, water pump and intake gaskets. other then that it is stock intake to oil pan, throttle body to flex plate

BTW Bunker people from other staes post Corrected numbers because you do not have the ***** to go dyno with them
Does Steph's car have a stall converter? trying to figure out why the TQ # is so high.

As for corrected vs non, they are both important since uncorrected numbers would be more consistent with a run at the track on the same day with the same weather conditions as the dyno run.
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 05:58 PM
  #34  
OneFlyn95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,431
From: Pacific North West
I WAS at a dyno at the same time you were
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #35  
NiteRider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,201
From: Montreal, Canada
Originally posted by OneFlyn95z28
I WAS at a dyno at the same time you were
AAAAAH HAA!! If you WERE at the dyno you'd know I wasen't there. Hmmp.. case closed.
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 11:42 PM
  #36  
Draco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,213
From: North Vancouver, BC
He meant some other dyno you nimrod

Last edited by Draco; Apr 25, 2004 at 11:44 PM.
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 12:06 AM
  #37  
NiteRider's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,201
From: Montreal, Canada
Originally posted by Draco
He meant some other dyno you nimrod
Hey nimrod i've never met elis before.

He also put the emphasis on "was" when it should have been on "A". For you we'll put the emphasis on your DYNO numbers.
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 12:09 AM
  #38  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Yeah here is what I think of Ellis's grammar
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 03:36 AM
  #39  
upgradedsupra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 163
From: BC Canada
Good numbers people. I wish I would have come but my car is in pieces right now.

I will redyno my car when the next time comes maybe since I will be adding a few things.

I never go by the corrected numbers since we are at sea level anyway. Noone I know of uses those figures. To each is own though.

Payam > No nunmbers then?

Duane
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 09:27 AM
  #40  
sideways_Into_3rd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,842
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by upgradedsupra
I never go by the corrected numbers since we are at sea level anyway. Noone I know of uses those figures. To each is own though.

Payam > No nunmbers then?
which bone stock car did you want me to dyno ? the black bitch ? or the white bride ?

u still gotta keep temps in consideration .. aka i dyoned on a day that was close to 30* out .. if u dyno in 5* .. of course u'll make a lot more power

and also, SNK is in richmond .. as we all know .. beneath sea level
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 10:09 AM
  #41  
Tw!tchb!tch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,696
From: British Columbia, Canada
Doesnt the dyno convert for temp etc ?
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 10:54 AM
  #42  
Draco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,213
From: North Vancouver, BC
It will either give you actual numbers, or SAE corrected for temperature and barometric pressure. My actual numbers were 5% higher then the corrected numbers in my sig (basically 450 rwhp and 480 rwtq).
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 11:44 AM
  #43  
JD30thZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,884
From: Surrey, B.C, Canada
How much of the shot was that with Craig?
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 12:26 PM
  #44  
Draco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,213
From: North Vancouver, BC
I had 150 jets in the nozzle, but:

1. The NOS nozzle is only rated for 125 crank hp shots
2. the fuel jet was too big, and the AFR was in the 10's lol

It ended up giving me about 110 rwhp.
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #45  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
If you want highest SAE numbers u have to go on a hot day, I was told that the engine power won't be affected as much once your at WOT with temperature like SAE persumes, so if you go on a cold day & dyno 400 actual, you'll prolly get 5% taken out depending, while if you go on a hotday, chances are your intake temperatures won't be increased as much as the outside temperature for differences, so you'd rather loose out a few ponies due to hot weather but most have a correction factor of over 1.0 or at 1.0.

Basicly most of the high NA HP guys say they get higher SAE numbers in the hot weather because of this, guys like Grees on the board that made 404RWHP said he only lost about 3rwhp actual when he dynoed in the hot weather but his correction factor was just below 1.0, while when he went on a cold day he gained 3rwhp in the cold weather but lost a ton in the SAE correction factor.

So it depends, SAE correction factor is based upon a bunch of mathmatical formulas which dictate the correction factor according to baro pressure, temp, humidity etc... in the real world its not so much accurate as you'd like to think, thats why I want to go on a hot day now!

My numbers from last time increased by 13RWHP & it was a much hotter day this time then the last, I made no changes except changed my valve spring which wasn't broken the last time I dynoed cuz it went about 2 weeks ago.


So lets get another dyno session going!

Matt.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.