LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

7/16th or 3/8th stud for rockers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 10:01 AM
  #1  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
7/16th or 3/8th stud for rockers?

At what point should you switch to a 7/16" stud over a 3/8" stud for rocker arms?
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 10:21 AM
  #2  
30thannZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 515
From: jacksonville, FL
I use the 7/16" ones for peace of mind.
see sig
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 10:23 AM
  #3  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,727
From: Little Rock, AR
Big lift, high rpms, race or play around a lot..those are good clues it would be a good idea. They are so cheap and reasonably easy to do (more so if you are getting new rockers at the same time) that it is just good insurance.
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 10:25 AM
  #4  
SVT Killer LV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 852
From: Las Vegas, NV, USA
There really isn't a correct answer for this. I suggest the swap the first time you do rockers on your car. I changed mine during the h/c/i swap on my car. Whenever you chain the valvetrain geometery added strength and sturdiness is a good thing. IMHO... this next motor I am building will have 7/16 rockers AND a rocker stud girdle...

It's just cheap insurance

Last edited by SVT Killer LV; Jan 19, 2004 at 10:29 AM.
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 10:34 AM
  #5  
350 HRSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,171
From: Henry, VA USA
I agree. I went to 7/16 w/ my LT4 Stage II heads. IMO, it is worth it. I posted the same questions here at that time as well, and received the same kind of answers *hint hint*
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 10:41 AM
  #6  
ibanez6rg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,579
From: Cincinnati, OH
I'll be using 7/16.
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 11:16 AM
  #7  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Re: 7/16th or 3/8th stud for rockers?

Originally posted by Gripenfelter
At what point should you switch to a 7/16" stud over a 3/8" stud for rocker arms?
I'd switch at the time I needed to go to 3/8 dia pushrods (on a SBC) for adequate stiffness. IMO, first make sure you are using the stiffest rockers available. Good 3/8 studs like ARP probably deflect considerably less than some rocker arms.

Thought: on a SBC, or any head with inline, non-canted valves, the bending loads on the studs tend to bend the girdles in their weakest direction, and they may transfer any bending in one stud to other studs. BBC girdles make more sense to me.

My $.02
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 12:04 PM
  #8  
FacelessZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,626
From: Baylor University - TX
I just went with my stock 3/8 stud after I installed my GMPP 1.6 rockers. After I get springs and pushrods I'll be switching to a 7/16 stud just for peace of mind with the lift of the XE 230/236...
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 12:08 PM
  #9  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Thanx guys.

I guess we'll be going 7/16".
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 12:15 PM
  #10  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Originally posted by FacelessZ
I just went with my stock 3/8 stud after I installed my GMPP 1.6 rockers. After I get springs and pushrods I'll be switching to a 7/16 stud just for peace of mind with the lift of the XE 230/236...
That means new rockers as well as head machining, right?

No flame intended, but what "peace of mind" do stiffer rocker studs give? Studs are not the weak link in the valvetrain. We're not talking about them breaking, just deflecting a few thousands of an inch. IMO, spending the bucks on stiffer rocker arms (which deflect a lot more than studs) will probably put you farther ahead toward a stiffer valvetrain which allows the valve to more closely follow what the cam is trying to do.

My highly-opinionated $.02
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 12:19 PM
  #11  
FacelessZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,626
From: Baylor University - TX
Thans for your input, but seat machining won't be necessary with the Crane 99893 springs I'll be getting...

I got such a great deal on these rockers, that's why I went with SA...if I feel like it (not an avid track-goer) I'll sell them off and go with a set of NSA 1.6 rockers with guide plates...and 7/16 studs...for MORE peace of mind...

Old Jan 19, 2004 | 12:38 PM
  #12  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Originally posted by FacelessZ
Thans for your input, but seat machining won't be necessary with the Crane 99893 springs I'll be getting...

Not for the springs. I meant drilling and tapping for the 7/16 base thread in the head if they are now 3/8.

I got such a great deal on these rockers, that's why I went with SA...if I feel like it (not an avid track-goer) I'll sell them off and go with a set of NSA 1.6 rockers with guide plates...and 7/16 studs...for MORE peace of mind...

Old Jan 19, 2004 | 12:43 PM
  #13  
FacelessZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,626
From: Baylor University - TX
In that case I'll stick with my 3/8 stud until I order an alternate set of heads to be sent to the shop...

Old Jan 19, 2004 | 01:23 PM
  #14  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,727
From: Little Rock, AR
The thread size in the LT1 head is already 7/16", so there is no head work to be done for the studs that are 7/16" on the top end. Both 3/8" and 7/16" studs are 7/16" on the head side.
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 02:04 PM
  #15  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Originally posted by shoebox
The thread size in the LT1 head is already 7/16", so there is no head work to be done for the studs that are 7/16" on the top end. Both 3/8" and 7/16" studs are 7/16" on the head side.
Cool! Thanks.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 PM.