I want this
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 28
From: Richmond B.C.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,419
From: Coquitlam, British Columbia
Originally posted by blue 79 Z/28
such a fake one! the gm made one had a all aluminum 427 big block in it! thats only a small block
such a fake one! the gm made one had a all aluminum 427 big block in it! thats only a small block
Jason...that is real...the original ZL1 had the 427 alum big block..the remake has the 346 LS6...
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,419
From: Coquitlam, British Columbia
Originally posted by 82z96ss
Actually there are currently 30 phase 3 02 Zl1 with big blocks. They have a 427 C5R motor installed in them. The other 39 have the LS6 motor in them.
Actually there are currently 30 phase 3 02 Zl1 with big blocks. They have a 427 C5R motor installed in them. The other 39 have the LS6 motor in them.
Oh ya..but I thought that motor was stroked
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,419
From: Coquitlam, British Columbia
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 806
From: White Rock,BC,Canada
<rant> "thats not a ZL1. This is a ZL1 http://www.coloradocamaroclub.org/Me...maro_pics.html ." (in my best Paul Hogan voice). Damn GM, why not name it something else. The day they use the SuperDuty name on a POS I think Im gonna change paddocks.
</rant>
CoryM
</rant>
CoryM
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,419
From: Coquitlam, British Columbia
Originally posted by CoryM
<rant> "thats not a ZL1. This is a ZL1 http://www.coloradocamaroclub.org/Me...maro_pics.html ." (in my best Paul Hogan voice). Damn GM, why not name it something else. The day they use the SuperDuty name on a POS I think Im gonna change paddocks.
</rant>
CoryM
<rant> "thats not a ZL1. This is a ZL1 http://www.coloradocamaroclub.org/Me...maro_pics.html ." (in my best Paul Hogan voice). Damn GM, why not name it something else. The day they use the SuperDuty name on a POS I think Im gonna change paddocks.
</rant>
CoryM
LOl...it's a shame the 02 ZL1 could kick the living **** out of the original
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 806
From: White Rock,BC,Canada
Please tell me thats not a 7.5" rear end underneath that thing? And yes Mike, I realize that one outperforms the 69 in everyway.... except for styling and sound . I think the 69 did 13.8 at 105mph stock. Seriously though, IS that a 7.5" rear end under a BB 02 camaro? It looks pretty damn small.
CoryM
. I think the 69 did 13.8 at 105mph stock. Seriously though, IS that a 7.5" rear end under a BB 02 camaro? It looks pretty damn small.CoryM
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,419
From: Coquitlam, British Columbia
Originally posted by CoryM
Please tell me thats not a 7.5" rear end underneath that thing? And yes Mike, I realize that one outperforms the 69 in everyway.... except for styling and sound . I think the 69 did 13.8 at 105mph stock. Seriously though, IS that a 7.5" rear end under a BB 02 camaro? It looks pretty damn small.
CoryM
Please tell me thats not a 7.5" rear end underneath that thing? And yes Mike, I realize that one outperforms the 69 in everyway.... except for styling and sound
. I think the 69 did 13.8 at 105mph stock. Seriously though, IS that a 7.5" rear end under a BB 02 camaro? It looks pretty damn small.CoryM
I respect the pre 70's sound and styling...as for the rear end, the 7.5 does suck ***...nothing 2200.00 can't solve
