finally got around to taking a sound clip
finally got around to taking a sound clip
Last edited by Amit; Dec 13, 2004 at 01:00 AM.
Re: finally got around to taking a sound clip
Originally Posted by bunker
Thats a cam in there ? 

Throw a cutout on and that will get attention.Was that done outside or in a parkade? That can change the overall sound.
Re: finally got around to taking a sound clip
Originally Posted by bunker
Thats a cam in there ? 

http://www3.telus.net/public/a7a74501/streetracing.mpg
Re: finally got around to taking a sound clip
Originally Posted by Tw!tchb!tch
Badass !! I watched a bunch of the racing vids we made in the summer last night. . . oh god I miss racing 

Re: finally got around to taking a sound clip
Originally Posted by Tw!tchb!tch
Badass !! I watched a bunch of the racing vids we made in the summer last night. . . oh god I miss racing 

Re: finally got around to taking a sound clip
Yeah with about 200 lb in weight reduction and not spinnig all the time sure. However, It think I remember dynoing quite a bit higher, do you remember now
? thats right. Ohh wait, I was running 11.9 A/f with 405rwhp and twitch 376rwhp with 12.9 A/F if I recall and 3.42 gears which prolly offer another 10rwhp over 4.10's. Plus if I see correctly I swear I am gaining pretty fast, its not my fault you and the mustang always wanted to race from a low speed roll so that I would spin and you guys wouldn't, then when I start to catch up, Ohh brake lights.
Mods since, properly tuned and running 12.6-12.8 a/f through RPM, difference felt? BIG TIME! And titanium retainers, WOT feel past 6k RPM = BIG IMPROVEMENT!
about 200 LB heavier and prolly around 420rwhp now, yeah I'd say you have a problem.
Thing is, my setup with a cc305 would make about 385rwhp or so, after that HP is hard to make and you sacrifice aircare + drivability for about 40rwhp.
? thats right. Ohh wait, I was running 11.9 A/f with 405rwhp and twitch 376rwhp with 12.9 A/F if I recall and 3.42 gears which prolly offer another 10rwhp over 4.10's. Plus if I see correctly I swear I am gaining pretty fast, its not my fault you and the mustang always wanted to race from a low speed roll so that I would spin and you guys wouldn't, then when I start to catch up, Ohh brake lights.Mods since, properly tuned and running 12.6-12.8 a/f through RPM, difference felt? BIG TIME! And titanium retainers, WOT feel past 6k RPM = BIG IMPROVEMENT!
about 200 LB heavier and prolly around 420rwhp now, yeah I'd say you have a problem.
Thing is, my setup with a cc305 would make about 385rwhp or so, after that HP is hard to make and you sacrifice aircare + drivability for about 40rwhp.
Last edited by bunker; Dec 13, 2004 at 08:20 PM.
Re: finally got around to taking a sound clip
Dude I was running 11.9 A/F, as a tunner I know that can yield a lot of HP, and even if it was 389, thats still shy of 405
No I didn't get in front of you, cuz when I started to creep you would slam on your brakes, I admit it was a damb slow pull and would take forever to catch up but it was a pull, and because you weigh a lot less ie. hood, no airbad and God knows what else you took off a 15rwhp advantage which it was at the time would not be enough considering you would always go in front immediately because I would spin with my 4.10's.
Also note that Thunderacing did a test and they lost 17rwhp at 7k rpm going from 3.42s to 4.10's.
But yes LS1 does rule consdering, I was still more powerfull and now that I'm tuned I''m considerably more powerfull then you were, I'm thinking I'm at 420rwhp now, but considering how much work I did, although impressive in the LT1 world, that much work on an LS1 you'd be at 460rwhp and less weigh, remember LS1's are alluminum block that weigh less there too.
No I didn't get in front of you, cuz when I started to creep you would slam on your brakes, I admit it was a damb slow pull and would take forever to catch up but it was a pull, and because you weigh a lot less ie. hood, no airbad and God knows what else you took off a 15rwhp advantage which it was at the time would not be enough considering you would always go in front immediately because I would spin with my 4.10's.
Also note that Thunderacing did a test and they lost 17rwhp at 7k rpm going from 3.42s to 4.10's.
But yes LS1 does rule consdering, I was still more powerfull and now that I'm tuned I''m considerably more powerfull then you were, I'm thinking I'm at 420rwhp now, but considering how much work I did, although impressive in the LT1 world, that much work on an LS1 you'd be at 460rwhp and less weigh, remember LS1's are alluminum block that weigh less there too.



