progressive easier on engine parts?
progressive easier on engine parts?
Is it easier on the engine to run a progressive setup? In other words, (assuming safe tune, all engine parts {stock} in good condition.......) would a wet 175 or 200 shot be as safe as a wet 125 or 150 if the larger setup is done as a 2 stage or is brought in progressively? I wouldn't spray it often, maybe every couple of months at the track.
I'm thinking (hoping) that since the initial shock can be avoided, maybe more nitrous could be used without increased chance of engine breakage. Or is the cylinder pressure just too much on a stock engine even without the huge torque spike?
I know I'd kill the clutch, but hopefully the engine and rearend could survive longer this way.
Thanks, Don.
I'm thinking (hoping) that since the initial shock can be avoided, maybe more nitrous could be used without increased chance of engine breakage. Or is the cylinder pressure just too much on a stock engine even without the huge torque spike?
I know I'd kill the clutch, but hopefully the engine and rearend could survive longer this way.
Thanks, Don.
Re: progressive easier on engine parts?
Originally posted by gasnmyveins
Is it easier on the engine to run a progressive setup? In other words, (assuming safe tune, all engine parts {stock} in good condition.......) would a wet 175 or 200 shot be as safe as a wet 125 or 150 if the larger setup is done as a 2 stage or is brought in progressively? I wouldn't spray it often, maybe every couple of months at the track.
I'm thinking (hoping) that since the initial shock can be avoided, maybe more nitrous could be used without increased chance of engine breakage. Or is the cylinder pressure just too much on a stock engine even without the huge torque spike?
I know I'd kill the clutch, but hopefully the engine and rearend could survive longer this way.
Thanks, Don.
Is it easier on the engine to run a progressive setup? In other words, (assuming safe tune, all engine parts {stock} in good condition.......) would a wet 175 or 200 shot be as safe as a wet 125 or 150 if the larger setup is done as a 2 stage or is brought in progressively? I wouldn't spray it often, maybe every couple of months at the track.
I'm thinking (hoping) that since the initial shock can be avoided, maybe more nitrous could be used without increased chance of engine breakage. Or is the cylinder pressure just too much on a stock engine even without the huge torque spike?
I know I'd kill the clutch, but hopefully the engine and rearend could survive longer this way.
Thanks, Don.
However, when it comes to stock piston and rods, you are eventually going to reach a limit no matter what the benefit of a progressive system. Exactly where is the limit? Well, there are alot of people running 150hp on stock bottom ends with good results. Is another 25 or 50hp too much? I guess that's what you are asking and I don't think anyone has a definitive answer. Just anecdote. IOW, there hasn't been enough experience. I wouldn't exceed 150hp on a stock motor unless I was mentally and financially prepared to rebuild it, if that's any help.
Rich Krause
Thanks, Rich. I guess what I'll do is run a smaller shot until I rebuild it. (Insert various unprintable words here.) I knew the 6 speed would be harder on the rearend than an auto from reading posts by the guys who are really fast. The guys with autos don't seem to suffer as much. I won't be spending that much time at the track, though, so I'm not going to worry about that too much just now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
Feb 9, 2016 09:21 PM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
10
Sep 8, 2002 11:08 PM



