Nitrous or turbo
#1
Nitrous or turbo
Well i finally got some money to start building my new motor for my car. The only thing i cant decide is if i want to go turbo or nitrous. I'm going to build a 383. The car is going to be a street car and wanting to make about 600 hp or more with the nitrous or turbo. Just cant decide which one. Its going to be a weekend car and hit the track every once in a while. Need some opinions.
#2
Well i finally got some money to start building my new motor for my car. The only thing i cant decide is if i want to go turbo or nitrous. I'm going to build a 383. The car is going to be a street car and wanting to make about 600 hp or more with the nitrous or turbo. Just cant decide which one. Its going to be a weekend car and hit the track every once in a while. Need some opinions.
Last edited by snorkelface; 02-23-2007 at 10:35 PM.
#4
Nitrous will never stop costing you money, because you have to keep refilling the bottle. You're also limited to a couple minutes worth of usage before you have to fill it again.
Those two things are enough to make me never, ever consider nitrous.
Those two things are enough to make me never, ever consider nitrous.
#5
When I was building my car I considered FI also.
At that time my car was a daily driver, and the goal was to run low 10's high 9's. To accomplish that figured I needed ~650whp. I decided on nitrous for the reason JakeRobb doesn't like nitrous......you can turn it off.
As far as having to fill the bottle....I spent $1200 on the kit and accessories
basic FI setup $5000...$40 per bottle = 95 bottles to match the initial expense of the FI kit.
At that time my car was a daily driver, and the goal was to run low 10's high 9's. To accomplish that figured I needed ~650whp. I decided on nitrous for the reason JakeRobb doesn't like nitrous......you can turn it off.
As far as having to fill the bottle....I spent $1200 on the kit and accessories
basic FI setup $5000...$40 per bottle = 95 bottles to match the initial expense of the FI kit.
#7
#8
I wanted my car to be an animal ALL the time, which is why I personally went turbo. To each his own.
#9
I've got a roots blower deal and a nitrous car (for comparison). Both are fun, I'd say the nitrous is cheaper initially and in the long run. Additionally, the nitrous is off most of the time. I do like the idea of turning the turbo down, it's worth thinking about.
Power wise I am convinced nitrous is where it's at, also with streetability. Cam and drive train selection can easily be maximized for the street.
As an example the firebird still gets 19 miles per gallon even with the A3, is still drivable in the snow, has 137,000 miles, yet it rips low 11s in the quarter. See sig car.
You hit the nail on the head "take it to the track every once in a while."
Run a dual stage, I do, one stage for the street and both stages for the track.
Power wise I am convinced nitrous is where it's at, also with streetability. Cam and drive train selection can easily be maximized for the street.
As an example the firebird still gets 19 miles per gallon even with the A3, is still drivable in the snow, has 137,000 miles, yet it rips low 11s in the quarter. See sig car.
You hit the nail on the head "take it to the track every once in a while."
Run a dual stage, I do, one stage for the street and both stages for the track.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cmsmith
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
09-14-2015 09:09 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
09-14-2015 02:02 AM