N2O Tech Discussion for the use of Nitrous Oxide

Which is easier on engine, NOS or supercharger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 01:59 AM
  #1  
kevmor99's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 219
From: Emissions H**L
Which is easier on engine, NOS or supercharger?

Which is easier on engine, NOS or supercharger...and why? I mean for adding it to a stock bottom end (being very conservative on either NOS/boost). After reading in the supercharger forum about too much pressure in the cylinders, is NOS easier on the stock bottom end?
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 02:33 AM
  #2  
sssalah's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,152
From: Bahrain
Yes I think nitrous is easier on the engine because its not in use all the time, so your engine is just NA when n2o is not used and thats about +95% of the time. Forced induction on the other hand is used all the time so the engine is under extra pressure always.
The stress on the drivetrain is a diiferent story, because n2o generates a torque spice as apposed to the more gentler curve of forced induction, stress to the drivetrain is more.
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 08:00 PM
  #3  
Josh-'04 GTO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,697
From: Petersham, MA
I agree with sssalah. In addition, superchargers generate a ton of heat. This heat brings on detonation, which is a quick way to toast a motor.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chris Ja
Midwest
18
Aug 1, 2002 07:30 PM
Caps94ZODG
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
22
Jul 30, 2002 08:45 AM
Chris Ja
Midwest
1
Jul 30, 2002 07:46 AM
Chris Ja
Midwest
16
Jul 23, 2002 11:18 AM
Chris Ja
Midwest
7
Jul 21, 2002 01:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.