Midwest Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin

What would a Trans Am look like with...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 09:05 AM
  #1  
Redbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 848
From: Rives Jct Mich. USA
Arrow What would a Trans Am look like with...

... it's tail feather (rear spoiler) removed? Should I be the first to try or does anyone else wanna volunteer???

HInk
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 09:33 AM
  #2  
Sparky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 135
From: Clarkston, MI
I think it would look just like the bank end of those 2nd gen Esprits.

How much weight would it save ya?

Mark
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 09:38 AM
  #3  
dreamer1q's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,445
From: Nashville, TN
It would look Gay
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 09:40 AM
  #4  
Timberwolf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,531
From: Battle Creek, MI
Originally posted by dreamer1q
It would look Gay
But that would tie in with the whole "Rainbow Pride" theme he has going though wouldn't it?
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:10 AM
  #5  
cASe SenSiTive's Avatar
Exposed Member
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 647
From: Dangerously close to Detroit
You definitely wouldn't be the first. Over on ls1tech.com a few guys have done it.
As I recall, they picked up a MPH or two in the 1/4.

It sorta made it look like the rear-end of a 2nd gen Ford Probe.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 10:21 AM
  #6  
dreamer1q's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,445
From: Nashville, TN
Originally posted by cASe SenSiTive


It sorta made it look like the rear-end of a 2nd gen Ford Probe.
Ahhh yes, the car Ford built for the woman in you. Seems to fit the theme
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #7  
SSpdDmon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,747
From: Farmington, MI
Re: What would a Trans Am look like with...

Originally posted by Redbird
... it's tail feather (rear spoiler) removed? Should I be the first to try or does anyone else wanna volunteer???

HInk
If it's a 4th gen., it'd look like a Sunfire with a fat ***.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 04:20 PM
  #8  
KGRESOCK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 824
From: LIVONIA MICH. USA
Re: Re: What would a Trans Am look like with...

Originally posted by SSpdDmon
If it's a 4th gen., it'd look like a Sunfire with a fat ***.
DING DING
we have a winner
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 04:36 PM
  #9  
Redbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 848
From: Rives Jct Mich. USA
Arrow Well I'd try it, but...

It adds like 300 tons of down force on the big end to keep the Hoosiers hooked, to prevent tire spin at 1000+ feet.


HInk

Last edited by Redbird; Jul 30, 2003 at 04:40 PM.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 04:52 PM
  #10  
IrocSS85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,737
From: waterford, MI - USA
yeah, Ive seen it in pics. it sure looked, umm, kinda stupid. plus, MPH doesnt win races, E.T. does.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 11:10 PM
  #11  
AutoRoc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,342
From: MI
Carbon Fiber replica is the only way to go, Kevin. Along with wind tunnel time to minimize drag.

In other words...Keep it. It would be like...wrong to remove it.
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 09:06 AM
  #12  
cASe SenSiTive's Avatar
Exposed Member
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 647
From: Dangerously close to Detroit
Originally posted by IrocSS85
yeah, Ive seen it in pics. it sure looked, umm, kinda stupid. plus, MPH doesnt win races, E.T. does.
Higher MPH=lower ET
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 09:23 AM
  #13  
Timberwolf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,531
From: Battle Creek, MI
Originally posted by cASe SenSiTive
Higher MPH=lower ET
Not always man... I beat that supercharged vette at the nats. he trapped 125+mph and I only trapped 117.

ET depends on traction, shifts, suspension setup, driver error, etc.
MPH just says how fast your car came through the big end.

Have you seen the GN guys that sit at the line and spool the turbo even after the light is green? 5 second reaction times don't win races, even if they are going going 8.85 at 154mph
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 11:10 AM
  #14  
ROADRAGE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 886
From: Lake Orion Mi
Originally posted by Timberwolf
Not always man... I beat that supercharged vette at the nats. he trapped 125+mph and I only trapped 117.

ET depends on traction, shifts, suspension setup, driver error, etc.
MPH just says how fast your car came through the big end.

Have you seen the GN guys that sit at the line and spool the turbo even after the light is green? 5 second reaction times don't win races, even if they are going going 8.85 at 154mph
But the same car, with the same traction but with a higher mph because of reduced drag should et faster

Shut yer hole
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 11:53 AM
  #15  
Timberwolf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 3,531
From: Battle Creek, MI
Originally posted by ROADRAGE
But the same car, with the same traction but with a higher mph because of reduced drag should et faster

Shut yer hole
nope, you're still too narrow minded on it there's a lot more to it...we could ET the same and him go a lot faster due to turbo lag, gearing, etc. All I am saying is higher MPH does NOT automatically assume lower ET.

There's a guy on the michigan speed board that has a DSM with 503hp and only 370 or so tq. and runs 10s. Think his MPH would be the same as a N/A car running 10s?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 AM.