LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

ZR1 motor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #1  
lt1pwr1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34
From: MI
ZR1 motor?

Wondering if anyone has put this in their lt1 fbody? I never heard about it until I raced my friend in his uncle's ZR1 vette. I didn't think I would lose that because I had my dad's 68 camaro/350 with a cam, decent heads and full exhaust. They are a DOHC 350 which makes about 400 horses stock and that was back in the early 90's.

Here is a website on more info about them.

http://www.mathewscollection.com/cor...tte_91_ZR1.htm

I imagine they are crazy expensive if you can even find them anymore, but I think it would be sweet to have in my TA.
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 11:10 AM
  #2  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,086
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Its called the LT5. Its a high strung, tempremental engine, that became seriously outdated when GM went to the Gen 3/LSx design. Replacement parts are near impossible to get, there is very little in the way of aftermarket performance parts. If you want 400HP from a factory motor, swap in an LS2 and have an almost endless list of performance parts available for it.

Or, go for a mild head port and matching cam, and make the same HP out of your LT1 at about 1/10th the cost.
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #3  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
Tim Allen had GM put one in his I believe 96 Impala rumor has it all said and done they had to move the firewall they did some performance work and it cost him six figures.

Like Fred said even very mild heads and cam will get you a 400hp crank HP LT1
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #4  
OBE1 95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 4,950
From: San Diego, CA
As stated above it's not worth doing. I would also expect that the wide head design would take more than a shoehorn to get it to fit.
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 08:46 PM
  #5  
CBR Crazy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13
From: Clarksville,TN
It is not important but did the LT5 use the optispark or did it use something else due to the higher RPMs the LT5 ran?
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #6  
96capricemgr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,800
It is not really related to the LT1/LT4/L99 series of engines as such it would not use their unique distributor.

The "LT" thing confuses a lot of folks, but I believe the closest thing to a relation between these motors is both were put in Vettes.
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 09:27 PM
  #7  
aboatguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 325
From: Back in the US of F'in A
Originally Posted by CBR Crazy
It is not important but did the LT5 use the optispark or did it use something else due to the higher RPMs the LT5 ran?
Used something else (Crank Trigger)


In a nutshell:

The LT5 has an electronic ignition consisting of coil packs, electronic ingnition control module, camshaft sensor crankshaft reflector ring, crankshaft sensor and th ECM. The coil pack consists of four separate, ignition coils.

The crankshaft magnetic pickup sensor provides timing information to the ecm. The camshaft sensor provides the correct firing sequence, and the crankshaft sensor signals to trigger each coil at teh proper time.

Last edited by aboatguy; Mar 11, 2007 at 09:32 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
LD Kirk
Parts For Sale
1
Apr 30, 2015 08:54 AM
sloppytot
Parts For Sale
0
Feb 25, 2015 08:30 PM
Rich_z28
Car Audio and Electronics
14
Aug 29, 2002 11:01 PM
Javier97Z28
Drag Racing Technique
3
Jul 24, 2002 08:13 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.