LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

what 1/4 mile times to expect

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 03:57 AM
  #1  
clcam97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 204
what 1/4 mile times to expect

this is my new set up on a 97z28 6m camaro,cc503(stock 1.5rockers) cc springs,ported intake,cai,LTs pacesetters,MT drag radials,lca,madz28 tune,ram clutch,aluminum flywheel,km,tb bypass,removed spare tire,jack,and back seat,im sure i'll be on the 12s,you guys think i'll be trapping over 110mph? im also running stock 3:42 gears
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 04:02 AM
  #2  
clcam97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 204
oh yeah i forgot im in Phoenix AZ,weather has been nice 60-70s,low humidity and around 700ft alt,assuming i get a 1.9 0-60ft
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 04:10 AM
  #3  
jonesy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 508
From: Niles, Michigan
skould be in the 12.70 range, the aluminum flywheel will hurt you a lil though, mainly used in road coarses
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:33 AM
  #4  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
Assuming good track conditions and driver ability, mid to upper 12s are achievable.
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:56 AM
  #5  
Ironxcross's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 459
Mid 12s if you can drive well.
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #6  
LSWHO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 927
From: Az
Originally Posted by clcam97
oh yeah i forgot im in Phoenix AZ,weather has been nice 60-70s,low humidity and around 700ft alt,assuming i get a 1.9 0-60ft
Are you talking about firebird? I always thought we were 1200 ft.
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 03:37 PM
  #7  
clcam97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 204
yeah firebird,well at least thats what i heard,i know speedworld its higher
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 04:07 PM
  #8  
slomarao's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
the 3.42 gears, 1.5 rockers, and flywheel are going to be whats hurting you.
Have you ran at the track before and cut 1.9 60fts? What was your last best time and what mods were done?
I think if you cut a low 1.9 60ft you ll be in the 12's, i dont think you ll break 110 unless you go 12.60's or 70's. 110 trap would indcate that you have around 310-320rwhp and similar torque. Guessing 13.0-12.8 @109.
With the 330rwhp im shooting for i looking for 12.50's @110 but i have every bolt on and light headwork.
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 08:20 PM
  #9  
clcam97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 204
i ran 13.4 @ 103 with a 2.0 on the 60ft. this was before the cc503,tune,springs and was on stock engine with 160k miles
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 11:02 PM
  #10  
slomarao's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
but you had all the other mods you listed on your first post on the 13.4 run?
Cuz if you did, i dont think that just the cam alone will get you 4 tenths. Especially without a dyno tune and 1.6rrs
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #11  
clcam97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 204
yeah i had all of those mods whan i ran 13.4, so a cam,and a tune form madZ28 wont get me into the 12s,its that what your trying to say slomarao?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
D1SC383LT4
Parts For Sale
4
Jan 1, 2016 01:56 PM
jb4xx
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Feb 2, 2015 10:00 PM
jayblev95
Track Kill Stories
3
Jan 15, 2015 07:48 AM
centric
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
6
Aug 15, 2002 09:04 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.