LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Well since motor is almost together, what do you think it will put down? *Reward*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:34 PM
  #16  
treyZ28's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,505
From: looking for a flow bench so Brook and I can race
379rwhp
390 ft/lbs

too much exhuast, not enough compression for starters

Last edited by treyZ28; Jul 5, 2003 at 12:36 PM.
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:35 PM
  #17  
Derrick Redd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: Gretna, LA
412 RWH and 427 RWT.
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:40 PM
  #18  
thewinner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,090
Originally posted by treyZ28
too much exhuast, not enough compression for starters
nah, wait till the nitrous is on it

and compression aint exactly the best place to pick power up.
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:41 PM
  #19  
Mindgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,985
From: In a house by the bay
A point of comp won't make a likety of difference either way. The engine won't rev to 7k and it aint gonna make over 500 hp at the crank. Then again, I may be wrong.

edit:
No, I'll go to the optimistic side of this in saying that you may see 425/435..... that's my guess. Hard to judge heads... and I have alot of faith in Lloyd, just haven't seen any numbers from his stuff as of yet. Should be interesting.

-Mindgame

Last edited by Mindgame; Jul 5, 2003 at 12:45 PM.
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:47 PM
  #20  
Dave Feerst's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 641
From: St. Charles, Il
To get much more than 400 RWHP fom a N/A LT-1 You need some fancy stuff.
From what I can see here is what he could have done to get higher horsepower NA.
Use 6 inch rods insted of 5.7, that changes the rod angle and decreses bore wall friction but also decreses rod / crankshaft leverage. good for a few HP but it will cost you a bit of torque.
Also using a cam with equal duration inake and exhaust valve openings will get you more HP at the cost of torque. Going with a solid roller so you can crank the Rs way up is the other way to do it. Unless you get really exotic looking for 500 or more is rediculous.

With that much exhaust dur, and that little valve overlap Im guessing it opens around 52-55 degrees BBDC A cam like that greatly reduces pumping losses but at high RPMs you lose some of the followthrough on the push on the piston, Whatever it makes, I say It'll have a good 50 more torque than HP.

Last edited by Dave Feerst; Jul 5, 2003 at 12:55 PM.
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:48 PM
  #21  
thewinner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,090
i sure **** hope it makes more that low low 400s.

of course, with the "low" intake duration, i'll gladly sacrifice some peak hp for more down low.
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:49 PM
  #22  
unTAmedLS1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 713
From: Glenview,Illinois,USA
I had a friend with 12:5:1 revving to 7500 with full crower valvetrain and funny thing is that it wasnt even solid roller still hydraulic and gaing hp at the rpm. I guess he was lucky with lifters
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 12:54 PM
  #23  
thewinner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,090
added intake runner size, 195cc
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 01:11 PM
  #24  
thewinner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,090
Originally posted by Dave Feerst
With that much exhaust dur, and that little valve overlap Im guessing it opens around 52-55 degrees BBDC A cam like that greatly reduces pumping losses but at high RPMs you lose some of the followthrough on the push on the piston, Whatever it makes, I say It'll have a good 50 more torque than HP.
its all for the nitrous later on I was REALLY hoping to see 450rwhp. hell ken mook made 406 on a 350
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 01:20 PM
  #25  
Dave Feerst's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 641
From: St. Charles, Il
Buy going with a 383 you increased the amount of ring friction over his 350 A 383 has more torque potential But Its almost as hard to make 450 with a 383 as it is ith a 350. And like I said earler. he has the 5.7 rods still, but less angle becuase of his shorter stroke, and what cam does he have?
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 01:22 PM
  #26  
Casperthe97Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 28
From: Sherman, TX
392 HP & 406 lb/ft
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 01:33 PM
  #27  
thewinner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,090
ken had the 230/236/112
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 02:06 PM
  #28  
zuluman13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 497
From: NJ
415/425
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #29  
frmula1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,201
From: Somewhere between a shotgun barrel, and a blood spatter on the wall.
HP: 419
TQ: 443

EDIT: cashiers check only please
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #30  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
415/415

I don't have a clue really but I could get lucky.

Sounds like it'll be a nice motor.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM.