LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

V6 vs V8???

Old Jan 27, 2004 | 10:58 PM
  #1  
Brad LT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7
From: Kitchener Ontario
V6 vs V8???

Im 15 turning 16 in a month, and im looking to buy an f-body Preferably in the firebird market, I was wondering which car is a better deal for your money, I have about $6000 and was deciding between a Firebird formula, a Trans am, or a V6 firebird, Cause the V8's would be more on insurance but I don't know how much, (plz tell me if you know), and plus Ive been searching around the net and Ive been noticing certain years are slower that others ex the 93-94 f-bodys seem to be slower than the 95-96's, exclude the 96 cause of the hp gains that year, but I still can't decide which I should get, I want a trans am (any year) 4th generation'', 93-97, but Im not sure if its right for the money, anyone have thoughts??
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 11:07 PM
  #2  
Zack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,310
From: Glendale, Ca
dont waste time or money on a V6
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 11:20 PM
  #3  
Zachz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 298
From: Naperville, Il
V6 F-bods = all hair no *****, they suck
i got my Z for less than 5000 and my insurance differance from my old car (1986 pontiac 6000 2.8 V6) only went up 100 i was 18 at the time so dont get a V6 look for a good V8 with a good price there out there youll find them. It took me 3 months.
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 11:23 PM
  #4  
jasons93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,612
From: Oklahoma
depends on how mature you are
Old Jan 27, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #5  
SS Mark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 282
From: IL
I wouldnt say 93-94's are the slowest. Some of the fastest lt1's ive seen are 93-94. My car ran the times in the sig with a coldair intake, small torque conveter(2400) and 3.73 gear. I plan on breaking 12's with a better converter on stock heads/cam/manifolds. Just a little comparison for you.

And Id buy a Grand Prix or something before I bought a v6 f-body.

-Mark
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 12:39 AM
  #6  
jasons93z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,612
From: Oklahoma
Originally posted by SS Mark
I wouldnt say 93-94's are the slowest. Some of the fastest lt1's ive seen are 93-94. My car ran the times in the sig with a coldair intake, small torque conveter(2400) and 3.73 gear. I plan on breaking 12's with a better converter on stock heads/cam/manifolds. Just a little comparison for you.

And Id buy a Grand Prix or something before I bought a v6 f-body.

-Mark
agreed, the 93-94 are not slower. If you are only 16, you might re-think what you buy. These are fast cars, and can get you in a lot of trouble.
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 02:01 AM
  #7  
Lost's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 389
From: Palmetto FL/Tallahassee FL
Well I'm 21 now and have had the car for.. hmm.. let's see three or so years. Before that I had a series of rags (ford courier pickup, 72 pontiac grand safari wagon, 83 ford ltd II, 89 f150, and a 4 cylinder 93 (new style) ford probe - yes I drove an import (mazda hybrid) with a body kit nonetheless (on there when I bought it). Some cars were and still are family cars that I borrowed.. the ltd was really my first car and the probe my second.

I can honestly say that I beat on those cars badly but only mustered one traffic infraction - a speeding ticket in the probe. I was certainly a much more responsible driver in comparison to my friends also.

I am confident however that if the v8 camaro I now drive was my first car I would not have nearly such a clean record.. in fact I would likely be dead now.

So you may want to reconsider what you get as a first car.. save being a badass for your senior year in highschool at least or wait till college.. I say keep saving your money for a good high performance vehicle and buy a $300 rag for time being (daihaitsu for example).


If you do decide to go the route of the fbody don't get a v6 - that's just wrong in my mind somehow.. the car just screams speed and badassitude but lacks the ***** to back it up.


My vote goes for the rag.. but if you do get a sports vehicle please don't buy the watered down version.. do it right or don't do it at all.


My .02.. and I don't mean to offend you.. remember I'm young too and was right where you are now not to long ago.
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 02:17 AM
  #8  
camaro 22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 242
From: Pgh, Pa, USA
Angry

WOW, I can't beleive how bad you guys are knocking v6 f-body's. There's nothing wrong with a 16 year old having a v6 as a first car. Hell, I didn't get my first car til I was 20. I've had my 97 RS for the past 2 years now, and that had more power, torque then Irocs i've owned or been in. I'm in the process now of an lt1 swap, but I am 25, have more money now, and insurance is cheaper. But again, there is nothing wrong with a 200 hp v6 f-body for a 16 yr old as a first car. Last, you can't even compare a grand prix apparance wise. How do you compare a grand prix to this???

Last edited by camaro 22; Jan 28, 2004 at 02:20 AM.
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 07:48 AM
  #9  
Shirl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 159
From: Dover, NJ USA
I almost bought an LS1 to commute in.
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 07:51 AM
  #10  
Shirl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 159
From: Dover, NJ USA
Wouldn't even bother wasting my time on an LT1 unless it was highly modified. But that's just me
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 07:57 AM
  #11  
v6maro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 147
From: troy,mi,usa
If you buy the v6, don't bother modding it, it's not really worth it.
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 08:00 AM
  #12  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,725
From: Little Rock, AR
The LT1 has a lot more power than the V6, but there is nothing wrong with the V6 at all (just make sure you get one that has a 3800 in it-late 1995 and up). A V6 f-body would be a good car for a 16 year old and cheaper on insurance/upkeep. Also, there is very little difference (if any) between 93-97 and how fast the cars are.
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 08:02 AM
  #13  
AxeGrinder30thZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,411
From: Pelzer, SC
You shouldn't knock the V6. Yeah, I got a Z, but I know some V6's guys with some pretty quick cars. Don't get me wrong, get the V8 if you can, cause man, it's fun, but don't think the V6 is a p.o.s.
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 08:03 AM
  #14  
Mitch666's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 464
From: Doylestown, PA
I had a v6 because my dad thought I wasnt mature enough and I dont know why he even bothered because I got a 94 z28 6 months later. I am probably one of the few teens who can respect power, but dont waste your time with a v6. My z28 cost 5800 and the guy through in a whole bunch of stuff with it, plus it has a 1500 sound system in it so I wasn complaining.
Old Jan 28, 2004 | 08:06 AM
  #15  
Jag's Avatar
Jag
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 60
From: College Station,TX,USA
Nothing wrong with V6, but you'll always wish you had a V8.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 AM.