LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Turbo Vs Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2005 | 09:24 AM
  #1  
1crazylt1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 214
Turbo Vs Supercharger

Lookin to get one of these..but dont no which would b better lookin for sum power for a mostly stock motor nothin drastic. let me no wat u think
Old Aug 1, 2005 | 09:41 AM
  #2  
BLinindoll's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 459
From: East Greenbush, NY
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

Go with the blower. No spool time. Instant power all the way though the r's.
Old Aug 1, 2005 | 09:43 AM
  #3  
steves97z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 352
From: swansea ma
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

i have an STS kit, could tell you if i like it seein as its not on the car yet. my original plan was for a blower but got a really good deal on the kit. the STS kit looks extremely simple to install lookin at the directions/peices sittin in my room. just be prepaired to spends lots and lots of money over the cost of either. this is why my kit is not on yet cause i need to get all the other parts to keep my motor in one peice. good luck
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 07:30 AM
  #4  
cjmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
Re: Turbo Vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by robvas
This is not true for centrifugal superchargers. (Vortech, ATI, Powerdyne, etc)

Boost goes up as the RPM's go up.
yes, but i think he is trying to say that there is no turbo lag. you dont have to wait for the turbo to spool up because it spins as fast as the engine lets it
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hal Fisher
Parts For Sale
0
Sep 30, 2015 09:03 PM
HAWG
Drag Racing Technique
2
Sep 25, 2015 11:41 AM
DelSoto
Forced Induction
4
Sep 19, 2015 05:31 AM
sleeperZ96BT
Parts For Sale
0
Sep 10, 2015 08:01 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 PM.