LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

is this time possiable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 10:22 PM
  #1  
Got-LT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 811
From: tallahassee, FL
is this time possiable?

12.2 in the 1/4 with these mods:

SLP Cold Air Intake
SLP LoudMouth Exhaust
SLP Single Cat Headers (ceramic coated)
SLP Clutch
SLP Pressure Plate
Pro 5.0 Shifter with short stick
Auburn Pro Series Locking Unit
Richmond 3.73s
MSD 8.5mm Plug Wires
Bosch Plat +4's
TB Bypass
Manual Fan switch


1993 Z28 with 6 speed.

I don't think it is but just want some others opinions before rising the BS flag.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 10:26 PM
  #2  
Pandamonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,417
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Not a chance.
I'd say mid to low 13's.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #3  
badblackta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 800
From: Ocala, Florida
Not a chance.
agreed. mid to low 13s
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 10:38 PM
  #4  
LT1ponykilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,035
From: Greenville, SC
Never say never. Russ Etheridge which Im sure will reply to this soon enough won GMHT's fastest bolt-on LT1 with almost those same mods. He had headers, exhaust, cai, 4.10 gear, 1.6rr's, 52mm throttle body, and some weight reduction and ran 12.2 on BFG drag radials. Stock cam, heads, and all.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #5  
QCKZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,853
From: Christiansburg, VA
with weight reduction yes
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:13 PM
  #6  
LT1ponykilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,035
From: Greenville, SC
Originally posted by QCKZ28
with weight reduction yes
Well they are calling BS and it could be very possible.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #7  
Daryn95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 177
From: Spring, TX
Originally posted by QCKZ28
with weight reduction yes
Lots of it.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:21 PM
  #8  
LT1ponykilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,035
From: Greenville, SC
Its still possible and has been done.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #9  
fstenuf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 891
From: Central Iowa
i thought 94 was the first year for the six speed
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:36 PM
  #10  
Pandamonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,417
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Originally posted by fstenuf
i thought 94 was the first year for the six speed
94 was the first year for the Borg Warner 6-speed.
In 93 the Camaro's were using the ZF 6-speed if I remember right.

I still think that would be impossible......
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:38 PM
  #11  
lastze4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 53
From: Newport News VA
Not a chance, period!

Im looking at that issue as I type this and I think Russ's success was due to a SERIOUS weight reduction plan for that car.
He ran a 12.42 with a car that weighs 3360 with driver!! My 95 topped off at 3620 with me in it( i weigh 189), that means that his car probably weighs in at an incredible 3160 without driver! (no offense Russ, your not a little man, I'd say about 200 lbs, but an a$$ kicking 200 lbs ) Every 100 lbs lost is about a 10th gain as a rule of thumb and you can see where that Et came from with the limited amount of "power" adding boltons he had.
GOTLT1, take your list and subtract about 500lbs worth of weight and you might get high 12's

p.s your sig says A/4, but the last part of your thread says its a 6 spd ??
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:47 PM
  #12  
Pandamonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,417
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
I tried some horsepower 1/4 mile calculators.
Guessing at roughly 280 to 290 hp being put to the rear wheels, and knowing the 1/4 mile time of 12.2 - the car would have to weigh 2600lbs in order to do those times.

Even if you were conservative and gave it 310hp - it would still have to weigh only 2850lbs with driver and all.......

So I stand corrected - if he managed to remove five to six hundred pounds from the car, that is a possible 1/4 mile time.

Extremely unlikely but possilble.
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:47 PM
  #13  
LT1ponykilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,035
From: Greenville, SC
He ran 12.2x and I dont know the mph.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 04:08 AM
  #14  
Got-LT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 811
From: tallahassee, FL
I know of people who have gone fast with major weight removal, but this car still has everything plus a ground effects kit and the following stuff:

2 12' Kicker Comp subs
Clarion speakers
Elkamelon Head Unit
MTX 600watt Mono Amp

So weight reduction has nothing to do with it.

@ Pandamonkey, I know that 93s had two different types of 6 speeds, one was the kind the Viper was using and the other (If I recall) was the ZF.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 09:06 AM
  #15  
LT1ponykilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,035
From: Greenville, SC
Originally posted by Got-LT1
I know of people who have gone fast with major weight removal, but this car still has everything plus a ground effects kit and the following stuff:

2 12' Kicker Comp subs
Clarion speakers
Elkamelon Head Unit
MTX 600watt Mono Amp

So weight reduction has nothing to do with it.

@ Pandamonkey, I know that 93s had two different types of 6 speeds, one was the kind the Viper was using and the other (If I recall) was the ZF.
Without weight reduction its not possible then.

And its the T-56 tranny you are talking about thats in the Viper and 6pd Camaro's.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.