LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

spec's on a 1997 trans am

Old Aug 18, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #16  
camaroKid223's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 457
From: Wilm, DE
Re: spec's on a 1997 trans am

im glad you two were able to help the tread starter so much with your bickering.
as for ricekiller congrats youll love your new bird!
Old Aug 18, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #17  
RiceKillerZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 24
From: Steger
Re: spec's on a 1997 trans am

i thought ram air was 305 but im not sure im leaving to pick it up now so thanks for the help. keep sending it and ill get back to u guys later.
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 08:43 AM
  #18  
WS Sick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,724
From: Oklahoma where trees are made of wood.
Re: spec's on a 1997 trans am

Yeah ,the rating is 305 according to the original window sticker.

My wife refers to me as her little man....
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #19  
Gos2Slo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 203
From: Napa, CA
Re: spec's on a 1997 trans am

My understanding is that the factory ramair setup (or aftermarket ones for that matter) don't help diddly squat on a chassis dyno, so ramair cars and CAI cars typically dyno about the same. On the track I hear ramair can knock off .05 or so (depending on air quality) so they do edge out a little bit.

Now, shake hands and let's have a beer!

What, it's 9:30 AM here, isn't it Miller time where you're at? Sheesh!
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 12:33 PM
  #20  
GreenDemon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,770
From: Mishawaka, IN
Re: spec's on a 1997 trans am

I think it's pretty much already been proven that there is no ram-air effect worth noting until triple digit speeds.

What is more important than that is location and design of the intake. Obviously, stock vs. stock, the ram-air is more efficient at what it does, but adding a cai to the non-ram air car neutralizes that. Both vehicles will be pulling air from outside the engine bay, and the cai intake "piping" is significantly better than stock. In fact, since adding a k&n filter to a stock intake has been shown to do basically squat, I'm betting that on an LT1 the biggest gains on a CAI are from smoothing and enlarging that one bend around the radiator where things squeeze down real tight, and on an LS1 it would be the "mouth" where the lid leads to the MAF.

And BTW LT1s may be underrated, but on an average it would probably be only 5-10 hp, nothing compared to LS1s. What is more important to consider and the reason why an LT1 can take down a lot of 300+ hp cars is because of the nice, fat power band.

And another reason a WS6/SS would be a bit faster is the extra 6cm of tread that comes stock.
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 01:03 PM
  #21  
slverbullet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 710
From: Gulf Breeze, Fl. USA
Re: spec's on a 1997 trans am

please correct me if i'm wrong here (politely), but wasnt there more of a difference between the ws6 and standard TA than ram air and bigger rims?

edit: nevermind, found my answer:

: The package was available starting in 1996 on Formulas Trans Ams only. Included in the package were:

Ram Air hood and air intake (like that of the Firehawk)
The 1998s and up WS6s have a completely new hood with 2 functional intakes right above the standard non functional nostrils
Freer flowing exhaust system
Higher rate front springs (360 lbs/in)
Variable rate rear springs (130-180 lbs/in)
Stiffer front and rear shocks
Harder bushings
Larger diameter front anti-sway bar (32mm)
Increased cooling
17 inch wheels with 275/40ZR/17 tires

Last edited by slverbullet; Aug 19, 2004 at 01:12 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fastbird93
Parts For Sale
24
Apr 9, 2016 07:01 PM
HarleyZ28
Cars For Sale
1
Oct 5, 2015 06:23 AM
siguy
Parts For Sale
3
Nov 27, 2014 10:07 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.