LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

SD vs MAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 03:03 PM
  #16  
MEAN LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,983
From: Jacksonville,fla
Re: SD vs MAF

Originally Posted by Slayer63b
Well I think SD has an edge on this board.
Hmmm?, Looks like you have a point but there is a reason gm went to a maf though. I think part throttle driveability and just the fact the motor cam compensate for different things when you have a maf makes things so much easier. Wouldnt you guys agree?
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 03:33 PM
  #17  
arnie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,462
From: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
Re: SD vs MAF

Originally Posted by MEAN LT1
.....but there is a reason gm went to a maf though. I think part throttle driveability and just the fact the motor cam compensate for different things when you have a maf makes things so much easier. Wouldnt you guys agree?
....."but there is a reason gm went to a maf though."

Ya, I stated why earlier.
Old Mar 30, 2005 | 06:08 PM
  #18  
BaddAss93TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 430
From: Eastern PA
Re: SD vs MAF

you guys can debate this all day long... and i know you will.

but its pretty common for higher output cars, especially FI cars to convert to SD. not yo mention who wants an OBSTRUCTION IN THEIR INDUCTION<haha

but for all you SD fanatics come check out speeddensity.org! its realtivly small yet seeing as we are bairly a year old. but there is TONS of educated guys over there... come check it out!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Double aught
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Oct 2, 2015 11:29 PM
marlar98
LT1 Based Engine Tech
13
Sep 19, 2015 07:53 AM
tommalcolm
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Sep 11, 2015 03:39 PM
sleeperZ96BT
Parts For Sale
0
Sep 10, 2015 08:01 AM
damnyankee36
LS1 Based Engine Tech
5
Sep 9, 2015 07:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.