RR/LT4 valvespring Dyno results...
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,442
From: Tacoma, WA, USA
RR/LT4 valvespring Dyno results...
Finally got to dyno today after installing Comp Pro Mag 1.6 RR's and LT4 valvesprings. Gained a solid 7 RWHP and 2 lb-ft. of torque. Not really surprising to me, but overall I'm satisfied.
Here's a pic of my runs:
http://images.cardomain.com/member_i...65_35_full.jpg
Here's a pic of my runs:
http://images.cardomain.com/member_i...65_35_full.jpg
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Originally posted by Heatmaker
Is your car broken.....?
Is your car broken.....?
I thought 10 hp was the normal gain from 1.6rr's so it might be a little low. Maybe the rockers are a little tight yet.
Also, how did you gain 7 hp from only 2 extra TQ.
Dan
Last edited by stereomandan; Dec 14, 2003 at 12:02 AM.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,442
From: Tacoma, WA, USA
I can't dissect this one too much for ya, the dyno tells all.
Oh yeah, run #8 on there (the green line) is the run with the Hypertech "tuning" installed. Funny how the other two runs with STOCK tuning run RIGHT with it.
Oh yeah, run #8 on there (the green line) is the run with the Hypertech "tuning" installed. Funny how the other two runs with STOCK tuning run RIGHT with it.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,442
From: Tacoma, WA, USA
Originally posted by hsyr
Maybe you never gained the 10-15rwhp that some people think you would get from 1.6rr's because you have no headers? Throw some LTs on there and I bet you would be aroun 315rwhp.
Maybe you never gained the 10-15rwhp that some people think you would get from 1.6rr's because you have no headers? Throw some LTs on there and I bet you would be aroun 315rwhp.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,442
From: Tacoma, WA, USA
Hey thanks. I would LOVE to have longtubes, but they just won't work for a daily driver. I barely clear speed bumps as it is, and I'd probably bang them into something eventually. So I'll probably stick with Mac's or SLP's.
Ya know, can't tell you how tempting it was to yank the serpentine just so I could eclipse the 300 mark.
Ya know, can't tell you how tempting it was to yank the serpentine just so I could eclipse the 300 mark.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 852
From: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Originally posted by Compstall
Hey thanks. I would LOVE to have longtubes, but they just won't work for a daily driver. I barely clear speed bumps as it is, and I'd probably bang them into something eventually. So I'll probably stick with Mac's or SLP's.
Ya know, can't tell you how tempting it was to yank the serpentine just so I could eclipse the 300 mark.
Hey thanks. I would LOVE to have longtubes, but they just won't work for a daily driver. I barely clear speed bumps as it is, and I'd probably bang them into something eventually. So I'll probably stick with Mac's or SLP's.
Ya know, can't tell you how tempting it was to yank the serpentine just so I could eclipse the 300 mark.
Advanced Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,874
From: Under The Hood
Originally posted by SVT Killer LV
I would seriously look into the RK Sports/Arizona Speed and Marine headers... IMHO the best shortie/Mid's out there period
I would seriously look into the RK Sports/Arizona Speed and Marine headers... IMHO the best shortie/Mid's out there period
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,442
From: Tacoma, WA, USA
Lookie here:
http://www.azspeed.com/as19lt1flotu.html
They claim to be longtubes, but they sure as hell look like mid's to me. I will definitely consider them since by the time you buy the install kit and gaskets the SLP's cost the same.
http://www.azspeed.com/as19lt1flotu.html
They claim to be longtubes, but they sure as hell look like mid's to me. I will definitely consider them since by the time you buy the install kit and gaskets the SLP's cost the same.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Sep 7, 2015 10:56 AM