LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

rev limit on stock lt1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 03:02 PM
  #1  
trans 96's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 30
From: atlanta
Question rev limit on stock lt1

can the lt1 stand to be rev'd to the rev limiter? if i got a different cam and head setup that allowed me to rev up to 6500 rpms will the engine be ok without any work to the crank and pistons?
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 03:10 PM
  #2  
Mr_Bond's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 289
From: Tallahassee, FL
Not really a good thing, since the stock rev limiter cuts fuel..
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #3  
Jazsun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,834
From: Indiana
Yea its terrible to hit rev limiter, leans the **** out of your motor. For whatever reason the lt1 pcm takes fuel instead of pulling timing.
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 03:13 PM
  #4  
trans 96's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 30
From: atlanta
ok so hitting the rev limit is bad. does it hurt the engine? other word will it **** something up or blow the motor?
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 03:17 PM
  #5  
Jazsun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,834
From: Indiana
yes it hurts the engine and you risk valve float on stock springs which means good bye motor
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 05:21 PM
  #6  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,086
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Shutting off the fuel effectively eliminates combustion. The PCM normally cuts fuel when you coast as well. This will not damage your engine. If you are running nitrous, there is the risk that the higher concentration of O2 in the incoming air charge could provide sufficient oxygen to oxidize extremely hot exhaust valve edges, but in NA operation, cutting fuel is not a problem.

The stock rev limiter settings depends on your tranny type (which we don't know because you haven't set up a "signature"). For the M6, the stock settings are 5,886 rpm in 1st gear, and 5,808 rpm in 2nd-6th.
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 05:41 PM
  #7  
trans 96's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 30
From: atlanta
ive rev'd y engine higher than 5800 rpms before it doesn't even seem to hit a rev limiter at 6000 rpms. why could that be? i have the t56 tranny.
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 06:04 PM
  #8  
Jazsun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,834
From: Indiana
Have fun over revving it. I suspect a "my car makes a constant rattling noise" thread soon.
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 06:36 PM
  #9  
3DFORMULA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 309
From: Bartonville, Ill
Originally Posted by trans 96
ive rev'd y engine higher than 5800 rpms before it doesn't even seem to hit a rev limiter at 6000 rpms. why could that be? i have the t56 tranny.
I too peg my stock motor. I speed shift right about 5900 and it does hit the limiter. This has resulted in my 13.09 @ 106 with the manifolds still on and 145,000 on the clock. AND,,,yes I do have some tap tap tap in the motor but I could still click off another 13.0 anytime without being nervous. The thread starter will be okay to rev that thing.
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 08:13 PM
  #10  
Stoopalini's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 703
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by trans 96
ive rev'd y engine higher than 5800 rpms before it doesn't even seem to hit a rev limiter at 6000 rpms. why could that be? i have the t56 tranny.
Because the dash gauge is not accurate. If you had a scanner, you would see Injuneer is correct.

Thomas.
Old Dec 19, 2007 | 08:21 PM
  #11  
96m6lt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,130
From: las vegas
according to my scannmaster my tach is off by 200 rpm down low and as much as 300 up high..
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 01:08 AM
  #12  
sbs's Avatar
sbs
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,154
From: VA
Originally Posted by Injuneer
The stock rev limiter settings depends on your tranny type
The couple dozen stock 94-95 bins I've seen have all had the same limits (5886/5805) - AT or MT, F or Y body.
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 06:38 AM
  #13  
trans 96's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 30
From: atlanta
yea i have a 96 t56 tranny.
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 06:57 AM
  #14  
<Puck>'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 321
As injuneer said, N/A it wouldn't neccessarily hurt the engine, but it is not something you want to do often - it is there for a reason. Most people agree that the stock shortblock is good to around 6300 rpms or so, but more then that is hit or miss. After repeated runs to that much rpm some survive, some do not.

The PCM does the same thing when the TPS percent gets to .72 or under to allow engine breaking when you let go of the throttle. It is when there is enough nitrous left to ignite without enough fuel where things can and do break.
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:03 AM
  #15  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,086
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally Posted by <Puck>
As injuneer said, N/A it wouldn't neccessarily hurt the engine, but it is not something you want to do often - it is there for a reason. Most people agree that the stock shortblock is good to around 6300 rpms or so, but more then that is hit or miss. After repeated runs to that much rpm some survive, some do not.

The PCM does the same thing when the TPS percent gets to .72 or under to allow engine breaking when you let go of the throttle. It is when there is enough nitrous left to ignite without enough fuel where things can and do break.
Nitrous can not ignite without any fuel. Its composed of nitrogen and oxygen, just like air, but with a different mass ratio of nitrogen to oxygen.

The fuel cut on coast is there to reduce emissions and improve fuel consumption, not to provide "engine braking."

Last edited by Injuneer; Dec 20, 2007 at 08:37 AM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.