LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

!!!read Here!!!(why You Shouldn't Use An Lt4 Km)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2003 | 12:16 AM
  #1  
Dmx4ever3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 236
From: NE philadelphia pa, FOX CHASE
Post !!!read Here!!!(why You Shouldn't Use An Lt4 Km)

These are my notes as to why you shouldn't use an LT4 knock module on a car not designed for one. These notes come from two compelling emails I saved from the LT1edit mailing list. I claim nothing here a my original thoughts or work.

Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:43 AM
[LT1edit] Why the correct knock sensor circuit resistance is important.
I can explain it in more familiar terms for us. We know the knock sensor is a piezoelectric sensor, basically a microphone. To visualize we can think of a microphone like a car/ home stereo speaker, except instead of broadcasting sound, it receives it. Our knock sensor is poorly optimized for a certain frequency range. So the knock module acts as a bandpass filter, meaning it lets certain frequencies through that indicate real knock (in this case prob around 5KHz) and filters out the rest. Back to the speaker example, anyone that has played with stereo knows about crossovers, which include bandpass filters (like the knock module.) Different speakers have different resistance (impendance) depending on how they're wired, car speakers are generally 4 Ohms and home speakers are usually 8 Ohms. A bandpass filter that has a low cutoff frequency of 5KHz on a 4 Ohm speakers will have a 2.5 KHz cutoff on a 8 Ohm speaker for example. So here we see why the resistance of the knock sensor circuit is crucial, if the circuit has the wrong resistance (wrong sensors, 1 instead of 2, etc) then the frequency range the knock module filters is completely different. This has been my answer why the LT4 knock module isn't optimum for a single OBDI setup, it's designed for 96 PCM, which has two sensors, different circuit resistance (3.8K Ohms versus 1.9K Ohms I believe.) If you've changed anything, just make sure the total circuit matches, don't mix and match or you'll get false reading, and now you know why.
Hope this makes sense,

Programmer
There is no possible way to "desensitize" a knock sensor (other than disconnecting it or shielding it from engine vibration). You can only alter the amount of timing retard that would normally occur in the software. This in NO WAY desensitizes a knock sensor. A different knock module filters more of the "noise" that could be interpreted as "false knock".
Old May 13, 2003 | 12:19 AM
  #2  
Dmx4ever3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 236
From: NE philadelphia pa, FOX CHASE
Question

I WOULD LIKE TO HERE FROM ANYONE THAT HAS ANY THING TO ADD TO THIS THAT KNOWS WHAT ALL THIS MEANS AND APLLYS TO LIKE WHEN DO U KNOW WHEN YOU REALLY NEED TO USE ONE LIKE WOULD I OR NO CAUSE I ONLY HAVE HEADERS?
Old May 13, 2003 | 05:39 AM
  #3  
Mtrhds94Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,955
From: Point Pleasant, NJ... USA
Do 96's HAVE '2 knock sensors'?
I thought all LT1 fbody cars had one?
Vettes have 2 [I think..]
Old May 13, 2003 | 06:17 AM
  #4  
RacinLT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,620
From: Dover DE
FWIW,my 97 OBDII TA has 1 knock sensor.
Old May 13, 2003 | 06:18 AM
  #5  
Brent94Z's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 4,060
From: Inverness, FL
While it sounds well written, is it accurate? First off, my 96 only has one knock sensor so that bit of info right there puts the entire thing in question.

I've been using the LT4 knock module in my cars for a very long time. They serve their purpose for me. In fact, I once got a bad batch of gas... I would get 10 degrees of knock retard everytime I barely stepped on the gas. Filled up with good gas later on and all was back to normal. This little non-scientific test along with the "hammer test" show that noise/knock can still be detected when using a LT4 module in a OBDI PCM.

While I realize I am reducing the ability for my PCM to detect real knock, I do know that the ability for the PCM to detect pinging is still there... just "desensitized" so to speak. Or, in other technical terms ... it just won't detect real or even false knock quite as good as the stock knock module. But, since that is exactly what I want and I'm willing to accept the risks involved, the LT4 knock module serves ME well
Old May 13, 2003 | 06:26 AM
  #6  
Stormman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 183
From: Long Island, New York
What mods generally warrant the use of the LT4 KM?
Old May 13, 2003 | 06:29 AM
  #7  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,109
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
I'm pretty sure that the only thing that cares about the knock sensor impedance is the terminal it's connected to at the PCM. Once the signal is inside the PCM, they would seperate the frequency curve that is riding on the bias voltage, and process that with the KM.

The second quote about desensitizing is irrelevant to the knock module. As was pointed out in the first post, the KM is simple a filter to reduce the sound signatures that are known to be associated with the LT4 valve train noise. No one is desnsitizing the KS with the KM, they are filtering it.

The point about the dual knock sensors on the Corvette LT1 is also questionable... each knock sensor on the Corvette connects to an independant circuit in the PCM and controls individual banks. It is not likely that the PCM sees the "combined" load of the two sensors.

Too many people have verified that there is little if any impact from the LT4KM on the knock retard function of the OBD-I PCM, except to filter "false" knock. I spent a lot of time verifiying that the LT4KM would respond properly to "true" knock situations, like poor quality fuel, and if performed just like the stock KM in that respect.
Old May 13, 2003 | 07:39 AM
  #8  
shoebox's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 27,727
From: Little Rock, AR
I would not use those posts as "compelling" reasons for not installing the LT4 KM. Most of that information is irrelevant.
Old May 13, 2003 | 09:49 AM
  #9  
93redz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 157
93 lt1 s have two knock sensors
Old May 13, 2003 | 09:56 AM
  #10  
BUBBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 3,499
From: PORTLAND, OR, MULTNOMAH
PCMFORLESS recommended it when I had OBDll progammed. Good enough for me.JMHO
Old May 13, 2003 | 11:14 AM
  #11  
rasilverbird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 59
From: Mt Airy, MD
Ya, you're confusing the knock sensor with the knock module. De-sensitizing the sensor is not a good idea, but changing the module to better read the motor is.
Old May 13, 2003 | 12:06 PM
  #12  
Kris93/95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
From: Bentonville, AR
JMHO:

Since I only mod the 93 a LT4 KM isn't in my future So, I'm sorta non-biased.

BUT,

If GM would install these on the cars they sold to the public, and they have to service the cars later, I can't see where they would see it is a "bad' thing.

but then again they thought the opti was a good idea too
Old May 13, 2003 | 12:38 PM
  #13  
I CORNER1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
From: Stuart, Florida
My 1994 Z28 M6 has 1 knock sensor. I too plan on changing it to the LT4 sensor and module, as my knock retard pegs at 10 deg even with racing gas (Increased valvetrain noise from headers?).

My 1996 Impala SS has 2 knock sensors.

Not sure about the Vettes.

As the desensitizing, the knock sensor could get you closer to detonation, has anyone tried to install a second LT4 knock sensor on the driver's side block to better capture that cylinder bank?
Old May 13, 2003 | 12:38 PM
  #14  
turbo_Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,515
From: Kansas
Re: !!!read Here!!!(why You Shouldn't Use An Lt4 Km)

Originally posted by Dmx4ever3
Programmer
There is no possible way to "desensitize" a knock sensor (other than disconnecting it or shielding it from engine vibration). You can only alter the amount of timing retard that would normally occur in the software. This in NO WAY desensitizes a knock sensor. A different knock module filters more of the "noise" that could be interpreted as "false knock".
hmm thats funny. i have desensitized the knock sensor twice. on my friends 95 we got the knock to completely disappear. all you have to do is use a resistor and if its strong enough or large enough then all the knock will go away.
Old May 13, 2003 | 01:37 PM
  #15  
Z95m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,070
From: newton, kansas, USA
I am just wondering what do the LT4 fbodys have? The LT4 km was probably used on the vettes did they use it on the fbodys too?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.