LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2005, 06:53 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Camarocracy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 992
Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake

Which intake system produces more horsepower on a 97 Firebird LT1?

A ramair hood with the ram air intake assembly and an air foil.

vs.

A cold air intake with a smooth intake elbow [Trickflow, Vortech] and an air foil?

I plan on buying a ramair hood later on, and I'm thinking on buying a coldair kit to hold me over until then. Probably won't buy the hood until fall/winter. I'm just wondering if the either intake systems produce more horsepower over the other?
Camarocracy is offline  
Old 06-16-2005, 07:00 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
LtsRace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 288
Re: Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake

I believe the hood with ram air produces a little more horsepower than a cold air intake. I think its somthing like 10 horsepower..at least thats what they claim. Ive got the suncoast creations hood and kit on my camaro. They say somthing in the neighborhood of 28 HP.
LtsRace is offline  
Old 06-16-2005, 07:09 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Feenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ohio
Posts: 346
Re: Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake

Ram air does on average nothing more than a good CAI will do. I would just get a CAI now, and when you go to get the hood I would save the money on making it functional and just get the hood with maybe heat extractors instead. Unless you are doing it for performance and not for looks, in which case I wouldn't get the hood at all, just get a CAI and be done with it.
Feenix is offline  
Old 06-16-2005, 11:40 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
trans9_5am's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 970
Re: Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake

In my learnings, ram air intakes help more at higher speeds than do non-ram air CAI's but the difference is minimal. I would go with a CAI for now unless you are getting the hood for looks and be prepared to dish out some money for a fully functional hood if so. JMHO

Brandon
trans9_5am is offline  
Old 06-17-2005, 02:36 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Dave '97 Z28 M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Posts: 953
Re: Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake

They're both effective, and I doubt that you'd ever notice any difference between the 2. As for the "ram effect", stock (or similar) ram air hoods simply don't have the scoop located in the right places to get significant pressure - the location, sitting right on the hood, is not in an appropriate spot. Just compare an SS or WS6 hood to a Pro Stocker's. And even with a scoop located high enough to be in the airstream, you'll rarely be traveling fast enough to get any benefit.

All that said, however, an f-body with a ram air hood certainly looks cool!
Dave '97 Z28 M6 is offline  
Old 06-17-2005, 06:46 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
97FormulaWS-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 2,668
Re: Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake

As for which makes more HP... to be honest it depends on if you make the necessary mods to the WS6 hood (Which makes driving in the rain a not so great idea).

If you de-baffle the hood, and use a smooth Fernco Coupler between the MAF & TB, you'll have the BEST CAI you can get.

If anyone wants to argue that point, I have to pose this information and question...

Mine is de-baffled and Fernco'd.... if I remove my airfilter and close the hood... I can SEE the TB blades through the hood... How does any aftermarket CAI with at least 2 bends and 2-3' of tubing flow better than that?????

As for if you'd notice the difference, I have no clue, I've never had a CAI on my car, just the WS6 setup, obviously.
97FormulaWS-6 is offline  
Old 06-17-2005, 04:32 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
slomarao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
Re: Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake

they will produce very similar numbers, if your good at working on cars then you could throw a ls1 lid on there. I have seen two guys on this board who have recently done it. I want to do it myself, that would make the most hp if that is what your after.
slomarao is offline  
Old 06-18-2005, 04:24 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
bdc95ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: houston, texas
Posts: 1,220
Re: Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake

Ram Air + lid should net you a noticable gain over a cai.
-b
bdc95ta is offline  
Old 06-20-2005, 12:35 AM
  #9  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,650
Re: Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake

My Ram Air setup added 300HP..... or maybe that has something to do with the two braided hoses and the nitrous.

In any case, the Ram Air setup is about as straight and as simple as you can get, particularly when you open up the scoop, cut out the top of the airbox and use the Fernco coupling instead of the corrugated bellows. I see very little depression of MAP vs. barometric pressure, even over 7,000rpm.

http://cjcfo.fbody.com/members/injun...s/AirBox01.jpg
Injuneer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
08-23-2023 11:19 PM
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
02-09-2016 09:21 PM
rcajun86
Parts For Sale
1
01-30-2015 01:56 PM
thenewkid
New Member Introduction
5
11-27-2014 09:41 AM



Quick Reply: Ram Air Intake Vs. Cold Air Intake



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.