LT1 Based Engine Tech 1993-1997 LT1/LT4 Engine Related

Racetronix vs Aeromotive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2005 | 02:53 PM
  #1  
JustNO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,025
From: Europe
Question Racetronix vs Aeromotive

-- #FLT1-FPK2 Racetronix Fuel System w/ 255 LPH High-Pressure Fuel Pump and Series II Plug-&-Play Wiring Harness (includes chassis ground & booster pump plug-&-play option), LT1 F-body + Aeromotive Fuel Pressure Regulator.

-- #17102 Aeromotive Complete Fuel System, 1994-1997 LT1 F-body

With which one I should go ??? Aeromotive includes Aeromotive fuel pressure regulator.. If I go with racetronix Kit ,I also will go with Aeromotive Fuel P. Regulator..

Link for details: http://www.thunderracing.com/catalog...vid=4&pcid=166

Any suggestion will be great

thanks
Old May 23, 2005 | 04:17 PM
  #2  
markinkc69z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 849
From: Shawnee Kansas
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

What are your expectations of the car? If you're looking to make an honest 450-500 hp and leave it at that level I would recommend the in-tank setup. If you are planning on some kind of forced induction setup in the future and really plan on leaning on it (500+ hp under belt driven boost) then you should consider our complete fuel system.
Old May 23, 2005 | 04:42 PM
  #3  
JustNO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,025
From: Europe
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

383cid LT4 AFR 210cc competiton Heads with 237/245dur. 582/592lifts 113lsa .. I hope it will be ~540hp at flywheel..
Old May 23, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #4  
markinkc69z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 849
From: Shawnee Kansas
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

Then I think a Walbro 255 would be a good choice. Don't get me wrong, we would love to have you install our fuel system, but the intank for your combination would get the job done.
Old May 23, 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #5  
BADST95's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 584
From: Naperville, IL, USA
Thumbs up Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

I used the Racetronix twin in tank pump set up and it works fine. I have have more than enough fuel. I used the stock lines too.
Old May 23, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #6  
JustNO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,025
From: Europe
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

Originally Posted by markinkc69z
Then I think a Walbro 255 would be a good choice. Don't get me wrong, we would love to have you install our fuel system, but the intank for your combination would get the job done.
Ohh dear.... I'm very suprised.. You are very honest.. thank you for this!!
BTW: racetronix kit does not include AFPR.. So it can be your AFPR right? With out a problem?
Old May 23, 2005 | 09:09 PM
  #7  
markinkc69z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 849
From: Shawnee Kansas
Re: Racetronix vs Aeromotive

Absolutely. #13107
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
Mar 13, 2016 03:37 PM
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
Jan 29, 2016 05:56 PM
form94
Parts For Sale
2
Sep 23, 2015 07:30 AM
IDOXLR8
Forced Induction
0
Jan 31, 2003 11:28 AM
Flyin t/a
N2O Tech
2
Sep 30, 2002 06:07 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.