Race fuel 100 oct.
It's Phillips66 Race fuel... I haven't showed any knock since I installed my LT4 Km and the car shows pretty agressive timing @ WOT but it does feel stronger with the race fuel ??? Maybe it's all in my head I dunno......Next time to the track I'm going to make some passes with and without to see if there is a diff...
----> I talked to guy about race fuel and he said imagine octane being like powder in dynamite the more/higher oct the more powerfull the punch. I always thought the only benefit was for high compression motors to keep them from knocking........
----> I talked to guy about race fuel and he said imagine octane being like powder in dynamite the more/higher oct the more powerfull the punch. I always thought the only benefit was for high compression motors to keep them from knocking........
Originally posted by Jeremy_30th
----> I talked to guy about race fuel and he said imagine octane being like powder in dynamite the more/higher oct the more powerfull the punch. I always thought the only benefit was for high compression motors to keep them from knocking........
----> I talked to guy about race fuel and he said imagine octane being like powder in dynamite the more/higher oct the more powerfull the punch. I always thought the only benefit was for high compression motors to keep them from knocking........
Octane relates to the chemical compounds that the fuel in the combustion chamber breaks down into, as it is subjected to the heat and pressure of the compression stroke. Certain compounds (end gasses) will cause a second flame front to develop remote from the spark plug induced flame front, and when these two flame fronts collide, there is a huge pressure wave, and followup vibration (detonation). High octane fuels have chemical compositions that resist the formation of compounds that auto-ignite. Nothing to do with energy content, "power", or "punch".
Where you can get into trouble with higher octane fuels is in the "specific gravity" of the fuel. If a lot of "light end" hydrocarbons are used to resist formation of auto-ignition end gasses, the mass (~pounds) of fuel delivered by a fixed volume device like an injector can re reduced, reducing the total energy content of the fuel actually delivered.
Originally posted by Injuneer
Where you can get into trouble with higher octane fuels is in the "specific gravity" of the fuel. If a lot of "light end" hydrocarbons are used to resist formation of auto-ignition end gasses, the mass (~pounds) of fuel delivered by a fixed volume device like an injector can re reduced, reducing the total energy content of the fuel actually delivered. [/B]
Where you can get into trouble with higher octane fuels is in the "specific gravity" of the fuel. If a lot of "light end" hydrocarbons are used to resist formation of auto-ignition end gasses, the mass (~pounds) of fuel delivered by a fixed volume device like an injector can re reduced, reducing the total energy content of the fuel actually delivered. [/B]
. It appears you have some knowledge of the petrolum industry. I work for a pertrolum pipeline and I have never heard the average person use terms like specific gravity and light ends.. We pump every finished product except race fuel so I don't know much about it. Also the gravity I can understand because all of our premium has a lower (heavier) gravity then the regular gas. Do you know about what the API Gravity is on Race fuel?
I use VP Fuels products. They list the specific gravity of most of their fuels on their website. Most of their fuels are "synthetic".
I had the opportunity to tune my engine on an engine dyno.... 381ci, 10.8:1, fairly mild 230/242 solid roller. We tuned it for 93-octane pump gas, then tried 94-octane pump gas (Sunoco Ultra), and picked up a few HP with timing and A/F ratio. Then we tried VP Fuels C-10 100-octane ([R+M]/2) unleaded, and were unable to pick up any additional HP, no matter what we did with timing or A/F ratio. Then to baseline it for the nitrous tuning, we switched the N/A motor directly to VP Fuels C-16, 117.5-octane leaded racing fuel, and the engine picked up 6HP. This appeared to be attributable to the slight difference in "specific energy content"... a reference to BTU/unit volume rather then BTU/Lb. The C-16 is a fairly dense fuel. Of course you wouldn't want to spend $7 a gallon for 6HP
.
An excellent reference on gasoline:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/autos/gasoline-faq/part1/
I worked for 13 years with a major oil company, both in engineering/plant design, including product blending, and in distribution.
I had the opportunity to tune my engine on an engine dyno.... 381ci, 10.8:1, fairly mild 230/242 solid roller. We tuned it for 93-octane pump gas, then tried 94-octane pump gas (Sunoco Ultra), and picked up a few HP with timing and A/F ratio. Then we tried VP Fuels C-10 100-octane ([R+M]/2) unleaded, and were unable to pick up any additional HP, no matter what we did with timing or A/F ratio. Then to baseline it for the nitrous tuning, we switched the N/A motor directly to VP Fuels C-16, 117.5-octane leaded racing fuel, and the engine picked up 6HP. This appeared to be attributable to the slight difference in "specific energy content"... a reference to BTU/unit volume rather then BTU/Lb. The C-16 is a fairly dense fuel. Of course you wouldn't want to spend $7 a gallon for 6HP
.An excellent reference on gasoline:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/autos/gasoline-faq/part1/
I worked for 13 years with a major oil company, both in engineering/plant design, including product blending, and in distribution.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM



