Optispark theory of operation (and general ignition theory)
Optispark theory of operation (and general ignition theory)
So looking inside of an Optispark, it seems to serve two distinct purposes: a distributor with a traditional rotor and an optical crank trigger/sensor.
A real basic question: Why do engines need points or a computer triggering the ignition? It would seem to me that if you left the coil constantly energized the spark would fire when the rotor passed by the pickup for that plug wire.
Is that just too random and variable, and hence the points/trigger are introduced to add precision?
A real basic question: Why do engines need points or a computer triggering the ignition? It would seem to me that if you left the coil constantly energized the spark would fire when the rotor passed by the pickup for that plug wire.
Is that just too random and variable, and hence the points/trigger are introduced to add precision?
energizing the coil won't create a spark at all... it's the colapse of the magnetic field in the coil that generates the high-voltages that travel to the spark plugs.
There's a pulse sent to the coil, this has to be generated somehow... it used to be by the points style, then it went to a magnetic for better reliability, and no necessity to re-gap and replace at regulat intervals...
Then once computers came around the magnet was integrated into the PCM controls to vary the spark timing. The Optical pickup was developed and integrated for even better resolution than the magnetic pickup...
need any more info???
There's a pulse sent to the coil, this has to be generated somehow... it used to be by the points style, then it went to a magnetic for better reliability, and no necessity to re-gap and replace at regulat intervals...
Then once computers came around the magnet was integrated into the PCM controls to vary the spark timing. The Optical pickup was developed and integrated for even better resolution than the magnetic pickup...
need any more info???
Yes please 
I'm still trying to figure out this whole "collapse of the magnetic field" and "an inductor resists change in current flow" bit....
So the transformer outside my house supplies a constant supply of stepped up voltage. But a coil needs saturation time and the produces a big surge when you break the supply to it?
What's the difference between the two, is it an AC vs DC thing? Or instead of this whole collapsing magnetic field thing why can't they just use the coil as a step-up transform and blast in a bunch of voltage when its the appropriate time?
Software guy asking hardware questions :-)

I'm still trying to figure out this whole "collapse of the magnetic field" and "an inductor resists change in current flow" bit....
So the transformer outside my house supplies a constant supply of stepped up voltage. But a coil needs saturation time and the produces a big surge when you break the supply to it?
What's the difference between the two, is it an AC vs DC thing? Or instead of this whole collapsing magnetic field thing why can't they just use the coil as a step-up transform and blast in a bunch of voltage when its the appropriate time?
Software guy asking hardware questions :-)
The transformer outside your house steps down line voltage to your typical 120/240 house voltage.. and it does this in a long period of time (in comparison) to your ignition coil...
The coil in your car is taking 12V and stepping it up to 30,000+ Volts... and doing it in a fraction of a fraction of a second...
I'm not a physics major so I can't explain exactly how it works..
Something about collapsing magnetic fields and the electron forces that it creates... It's beyond defentely beyond my scope of knowledge (And I'm not one to admit that I don't know something very often)
The coil in your car is taking 12V and stepping it up to 30,000+ Volts... and doing it in a fraction of a fraction of a second...
I'm not a physics major so I can't explain exactly how it works..
Something about collapsing magnetic fields and the electron forces that it creates... It's beyond defentely beyond my scope of knowledge (And I'm not one to admit that I don't know something very often)
the inductor is a coil, the voltage across an inductor is l(di/dt) di/dt is the rate of change of the current. So when you switch the current through the coil on and off very quickly you generate a high voltage, low current signal.
Originally posted by davepl
Or instead of this whole collapsing magnetic field thing why can't they just use the coil as a step-up transform and blast in a bunch of voltage when its the appropriate time?
Or instead of this whole collapsing magnetic field thing why can't they just use the coil as a step-up transform and blast in a bunch of voltage when its the appropriate time?
Originally posted by davepl
So when the magnetic field of a coil collapses, it generates a spike of voltage far in excess of what the normal stepup from its windings would be?
So when the magnetic field of a coil collapses, it generates a spike of voltage far in excess of what the normal stepup from its windings would be?
V = L * (dI / dt)
L is inductance measured in Henries.
The key is the (dI / dt); change in current with respect to change in time. So the faster you change the current through the coil, the larger the voltage across the coil. Now imagine flipping a switch and what that does to (dI / dt); it becomes huge, and so does the voltage.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



